Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

David E Sandman

Biographic Data

ID5854675
NAMEDavid E Sandman
GIVEN NAMESDavid E
FAMILY NAMESandman
SIGNATURESANDMAN D E
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Cincinnati
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS3
WORKS AS AUTHOR4
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1992
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2003
H-INDEX1
  • Loudness Adaptation

    Keith S Jones, Ernest M Weiler et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of General Psychology•2003•References: 4

    In the present study, the authors tested the hypothesis that contrast effects confound the Ipsilateral Comparison Paradigm (ICP). Bidirectional referents were used in which base tones of 50 or 70 dB alternated with referents of greater or lesser intensity in a 3.5-min listening period. The contrast hypothesis leads to the expectation that the bidirectional referents would produce opposing effects that should nullify time-based loudness changes in…

  • Ipsilateral Loudness Adaptation Over Multiple Intensity Levels

    Ernest M Weiler, David E Sandman et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of General Psychology•2000•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    Could monaural loudness adaptation be a simple artifact of psychophysical contrast? From adaptation data based on the Ipsilateral Comparison Paradigm (ICP), A. J. Dange, J. S. Warm, E. M. Weiler, and W. N. Dember (1993) concluded that loudness adaptation was not an artifact of psychophysical contrast, but their conclusion was dependent on results from one intensity. This study, involving multiple intensities, re-examined the issue of contrast ver…

  • Visual Evoked Potentials in Early Alzheimer's Dementia

    Amy S Grayson, Ernest M Weiler et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of General Psychology•1995•References: 1

    Topographical maps of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded from 10 possible Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and 10 control subjects. The purpose of the study was to determine if the two types of VEPs could function as a diagnostic screening for AD. Results of the statistical analysis did not reveal any latency differences between VEPs for the components elicited by either the pattern shift visual evoked potential (PSVEP)--or flash visu…

  • Four Triggering Factors in Loudness Adaptation

    Ernest M Weiler, Laurie Smith Gold et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of General Psychology•1992•Cited by: 2•References: 1

    A factor analysis was used to determine whether induced loudness adaptation (Botte, Canevet, & Scharf, 1982; Scharf, 1983) and adaptation measured by Hood's (1950) classic Simultaneous Dichotic Loudness Balance technique (SDLB) would cluster on the same factors. The two phenomena did not cluster on the same factors; thus, induced adaptation cannot replace SDLB adaptation. Four independent factors that trigger auditory adaptation were identified i…

  • Four Triggering Factors in Loudness Adaptation

    Ernest M Weiler, Laurie Smith Gold et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of General Psychology•1992•Cited by: 2•References: 1

    A factor analysis was used to determine whether induced loudness adaptation (Botte, Canevet, & Scharf, 1982; Scharf, 1983) and adaptation measured by Hood's (1950) classic Simultaneous Dichotic Loudness Balance technique (SDLB) would cluster on the same factors. The two phenomena did not cluster on the same factors; thus, induced adaptation cannot replace SDLB adaptation. Four independent factors that trigger auditory adaptation were identified i…

  • Ipsilateral Loudness Adaptation Over Multiple Intensity Levels

    Ernest M Weiler, David E Sandman et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of General Psychology•2000•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    Could monaural loudness adaptation be a simple artifact of psychophysical contrast? From adaptation data based on the Ipsilateral Comparison Paradigm (ICP), A. J. Dange, J. S. Warm, E. M. Weiler, and W. N. Dember (1993) concluded that loudness adaptation was not an artifact of psychophysical contrast, but their conclusion was dependent on results from one intensity. This study, involving multiple intensities, re-examined the issue of contrast ver…

  • Four Triggering Factors in Loudness Adaptation

    Ernest M Weiler, Laurie Smith Gold et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of General Psychology•1992•Cited by: 2•References: 1

    A factor analysis was used to determine whether induced loudness adaptation (Botte, Canevet, & Scharf, 1982; Scharf, 1983) and adaptation measured by Hood's (1950) classic Simultaneous Dichotic Loudness Balance technique (SDLB) would cluster on the same factors. The two phenomena did not cluster on the same factors; thus, induced adaptation cannot replace SDLB adaptation. Four independent factors that trigger auditory adaptation were identified i…

  • Visual Evoked Potentials in Early Alzheimer's Dementia

    Amy S Grayson, Ernest M Weiler et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of General Psychology•1995•References: 1

    Topographical maps of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded from 10 possible Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and 10 control subjects. The purpose of the study was to determine if the two types of VEPs could function as a diagnostic screening for AD. Results of the statistical analysis did not reveal any latency differences between VEPs for the components elicited by either the pattern shift visual evoked potential (PSVEP)--or flash visu…

  • Ipsilateral Loudness Adaptation Over Multiple Intensity Levels

    Ernest M Weiler, David E Sandman et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of General Psychology•2000•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    Could monaural loudness adaptation be a simple artifact of psychophysical contrast? From adaptation data based on the Ipsilateral Comparison Paradigm (ICP), A. J. Dange, J. S. Warm, E. M. Weiler, and W. N. Dember (1993) concluded that loudness adaptation was not an artifact of psychophysical contrast, but their conclusion was dependent on results from one intensity. This study, involving multiple intensities, re-examined the issue of contrast ver…

  • Loudness Adaptation

    Keith S Jones, Ernest M Weiler et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of General Psychology•2003•References: 4

    In the present study, the authors tested the hypothesis that contrast effects confound the Ipsilateral Comparison Paradigm (ICP). Bidirectional referents were used in which base tones of 50 or 70 dB alternated with referents of greater or lesser intensity in a 3.5-min listening period. The contrast hypothesis leads to the expectation that the bidirectional referents would produce opposing effects that should nullify time-based loudness changes in…

Audiology (4 works) · Medicine (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Adaptation (eye (3 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (3 works) · Loudness (3 works) · Neuroscience (3 works) · Artificial Intelligence (2 works) · Artificial Intelligence (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae