Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Amelia Gangemi

Biographic Data

ID5855257
NAMEAmelia Gangemi
GIVEN NAMESAmelia
FAMILY NAMEGangemi
SIGNATUREGANGEMI A
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Messina
ORCID0000-0002-0067-0050
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR4
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1998
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX0
  • A contribute to the default-interventionist and parallel accounts in deductive reasoning. The effect of decisional styles on logic and belief

    Rosa Angela Fabio, Dalila Verzì et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of General Psychology•2023•References: 1

    Classical theories of reasoning equate System 1 with biases and System 2 with correct responses. Refined theories of reasoning propose the parallel model to explain the two systems. The first purpose of the present article is to give a contribution to the debate on the parallel and default-interventionfist models: we hypothesized when logic and belief conflict both logical validity and belief judgments will be affected with greater level of respo…

  • Guilt and focusing in decision‐making

    Open Access•Amelia Gangemi, Francesco Mancini•ARTICLE•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2006•References: 5

    In this paper we examined the impact of a specific emotion, guilt, on focusing in decision‐making. Through the focusing mechanism, when making decisions, individuals tend to restrict their thoughts to what is explicitly represented in the decisional task, disregarding alternatives. In this paper, three experiments are performed to investigate whether an emotional state of guilt can critically guide individuals' focusing, and even prevailing over …

  • Responsibility, Guilt, and Decision Under Risk

    Francesco Mancini, Amelia Gangemi•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•2003

  • Operational Intelligence and School Problems Measured by Piagetian Tasks and Rhode Island Pupil Identification Scale

    Open Access•Maurizio Cardaci, Amelia Gangemi et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1998

    To explore the relations between operational intelligence rated on several Piagetian tasks and school learning problems identified by the Rhode Island Pupil Identification Scale by Novack, Bonaventura, and Merenda we assumed that Piagetian performances would allow predicting learning problems of first graders. 38 pupils were evaluated by three teachers, who were asked to complete the Rhode Island scale. Then the same children were individually gi…

No prominent works on this page.

  • Operational Intelligence and School Problems Measured by Piagetian Tasks and Rhode Island Pupil Identification Scale

    Open Access•Maurizio Cardaci, Amelia Gangemi et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1998

    To explore the relations between operational intelligence rated on several Piagetian tasks and school learning problems identified by the Rhode Island Pupil Identification Scale by Novack, Bonaventura, and Merenda we assumed that Piagetian performances would allow predicting learning problems of first graders. 38 pupils were evaluated by three teachers, who were asked to complete the Rhode Island scale. Then the same children were individually gi…

  • Responsibility, Guilt, and Decision Under Risk

    Francesco Mancini, Amelia Gangemi•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•2003

  • Guilt and focusing in decision‐making

    Open Access•Amelia Gangemi, Francesco Mancini•ARTICLE•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2006•References: 5

    In this paper we examined the impact of a specific emotion, guilt, on focusing in decision‐making. Through the focusing mechanism, when making decisions, individuals tend to restrict their thoughts to what is explicitly represented in the decisional task, disregarding alternatives. In this paper, three experiments are performed to investigate whether an emotional state of guilt can critically guide individuals' focusing, and even prevailing over …

  • A contribute to the default-interventionist and parallel accounts in deductive reasoning. The effect of decisional styles on logic and belief

    Rosa Angela Fabio, Dalila Verzì et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of General Psychology•2023•References: 1

    Classical theories of reasoning equate System 1 with biases and System 2 with correct responses. Refined theories of reasoning propose the parallel model to explain the two systems. The first purpose of the present article is to give a contribution to the debate on the parallel and default-interventionfist models: we hypothesized when logic and belief conflict both logical validity and belief judgments will be affected with greater level of respo…

Psychology (4 works) · Cognitive psychology (3 works) · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 works) · Cognition (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Economics (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae