Kei Kataoka
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 5856533 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Kei Kataoka |
| PRENOMES | Kei |
| SOBRENOME | Kataoka |
| ASSINATURA | KATAOKA K |
| AFILIAÇÕES | Kyushu University |
| VERIFICADO | Não |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 6 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 6 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 6 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2003 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2023 |
| ÍNDICE H | 2 |
The Battle of the Mongoose and the Snake
ダルマキールティのクマーリラ批判を引き継いだシャーンタラクシタは,『タットヴァ・サングラハ』最終章において,クマーリラの全知者批判を斥け,全知者の存在を擁護する.そこで彼はクマーリラの散逸した著作である『ブリハット・ティーカー』から大量の詩節を前主張として引用する.そして,後主張において,クマーリラの主張を逐一否定する.本稿では,ミーマーンサーと仏教の対立を,マングースと蛇の戦いにクマーリラが例えている前主張部(TS 3154-55)と,それに対してシャーンタラクシタが答える後主張部(TS 3374-79)とを取り上げる.この議論は,クマーリラの先行著作である『シュローカ・ヴァールッティカ』には見られなかったものであり,『ブリハット・ティーカー』においてクマーリラが新たに導入した議論と推測される.本研究では,これらの詩節が,クマーリラの著作の中でどのような文脈に位置するのかを明らかにすることで,この詩節が登場する議論の文脈を整理するとともに,このような比喩が登場した背景を探ることで,この…
Is the Particular Inferable? Dignāga’s Argument on the Inference of Wind
In this paper I clarify the context of the entire section of Pramāṇasamuccaya 2.3cd–5ab, in which 2.5ab is found, based on Dignāga’s original intention, and clarify the course of the discussion. Finally, by referring to or reinterpreting the assertion of Vaiśeṣikasūtra 2.1.18–19, Dignāga reinterprets the assertion that the inference (strictly speaking, a combination of the words of a trustworthy person [āpta] and elimination) can convey the speci…
The Multilayered Nature of Śābarabhāṣya ad 1.1.1
In interpreting the opening sūtra, athāto dharmajijñāsā, Śabara develops several different solutions, some of which are explicitly refuted, and some that move towards higher conclusions while giving the appearance of his own solutions. There are two intermediate and final conclusions in his explanation of the first word atha. The opponent whom Śabara criticizes at the beginning of his commentary by saying that “the wording of the sūtra should not…
Horns in Dignāga’s Theory of apoha
Dignāga, Kumārila and Dharmakīrti on the Potential Problem of pramāṇa and phala Having Different Objects
The MīmāmMsā Definition of PramanMa as a Source of New Information
The MīmāmMsā Definition of PramanMa as a Source of New Information
Dignāga, Kumārila and Dharmakīrti on the Potential Problem of pramāṇa and phala Having Different Objects
Horns in Dignāga’s Theory of apoha
The Multilayered Nature of Śābarabhāṣya ad 1.1.1
In interpreting the opening sūtra, athāto dharmajijñāsā, Śabara develops several different solutions, some of which are explicitly refuted, and some that move towards higher conclusions while giving the appearance of his own solutions. There are two intermediate and final conclusions in his explanation of the first word atha. The opponent whom Śabara criticizes at the beginning of his commentary by saying that “the wording of the sūtra should not…
The Battle of the Mongoose and the Snake
ダルマキールティのクマーリラ批判を引き継いだシャーンタラクシタは,『タットヴァ・サングラハ』最終章において,クマーリラの全知者批判を斥け,全知者の存在を擁護する.そこで彼はクマーリラの散逸した著作である『ブリハット・ティーカー』から大量の詩節を前主張として引用する.そして,後主張において,クマーリラの主張を逐一否定する.本稿では,ミーマーンサーと仏教の対立を,マングースと蛇の戦いにクマーリラが例えている前主張部(TS 3154-55)と,それに対してシャーンタラクシタが答える後主張部(TS 3374-79)とを取り上げる.この議論は,クマーリラの先行著作である『シュローカ・ヴァールッティカ』には見られなかったものであり,『ブリハット・ティーカー』においてクマーリラが新たに導入した議論と推測される.本研究では,これらの詩節が,クマーリラの著作の中でどのような文脈に位置するのかを明らかにすることで,この詩節が登場する議論の文脈を整理するとともに,このような比喩が登場した背景を探ることで,この…
Is the Particular Inferable? Dignāga’s Argument on the Inference of Wind
In this paper I clarify the context of the entire section of Pramāṇasamuccaya 2.3cd–5ab, in which 2.5ab is found, based on Dignāga’s original intention, and clarify the course of the discussion. Finally, by referring to or reinterpreting the assertion of Vaiśeṣikasūtra 2.1.18–19, Dignāga reinterprets the assertion that the inference (strictly speaking, a combination of the words of a trustworthy person [āpta] and elimination) can convey the speci…
Indian and Buddhist Studies (5 obras) · Philosophy (5 obras) · Epistemology (3 obras) · Philosophy (3 obras) · Chinese history and philosophy (2 obras) · Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 obras) · History (2 obras) · Linguistics (2 obras) · Mathematics (2 obras) · Medieval and Classical Philosophy (2 obras)