Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Natalia Zarzeczna

Biographic Data

ID5877766
NAMENatalia Zarzeczna
GIVEN NAMESNatalia
FAMILY NAMEZarzeczna
SIGNATUREZARZECZNA N
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
ORCID0000-0002-6107-2660
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS13
TOTAL CITATIONS8
WORKS AS AUTHOR13
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2019
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX2
  • The feeling is not mutual

    Open Access•Natalia Zarzeczna, Jesse L Preston et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology of Religion and…•2025

    The aim of the present research was to examine the independent contribution of beliefs in science and religion, respectively, to perceptions of science–religion compatibility across diverse countries and religious groups. To assess this, we recruited participants from three countries (the United Kingdom, Netherlands, and Kazakhstan; N = 684) and presented them with measures of belief in science and religious belief as independent constructs, such…

  • Meaning in science as a response to existential threat

    Open Access•Natalia Zarzeczna, Jesse L Preston•ARTICLE•Psychology of Religion and…•2025

  • Psychological Distance to Science Affects Science Evaluations

    Open Access•Bojana Većkalov, Natalia Zarzeczna et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Social Issues•2025•Cited by: 2•References: 84

    In four experiments (three preregistered; N total = 4511), we investigated the influence of psychological distance to science (PSYDISC) on science evaluations. PSYDISC reflects the extent to which science is perceived as an (in)tangible undertaking conducted by people (dis)similar to oneself ( social ), with effects in the here (far away; spatial ) and now (in the distant future; temporal ), and as (un)useful and (in)applicable in the real world …

  • Psychological Distance to Science as a Predictor of Science Skepticism Across Domains

    Open Access•Bojana Većkalov, Natalia Zarzeczna et al.•ARTICLE•Personality and Social Psychology…•2024

    This article presents and tests psychological distance to science (PSYDISC) as a domain-general predictor of science skepticism. Drawing on the concept of psychological distance, PSYDISC reflects the extent to which individuals perceive science as a tangible undertaking conducted by people similar to oneself ( social), with effects in the here ( spatial) and now ( temporal), and as useful and applicable in the real world ( hypothetical distance).…

  • Threatened by the immoral, challenged by the incompetent

    Open Access•Romy van der Lee, Naomi Ellemers et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2024

    In group contexts, moral judgments are used as social influence tactics to regulate the behavior of group members. We argue that communicating moral disapproval with the aim of adapting group members’ behavior might backfire because it elicits (negative) threat rather than (positive) challenge. In two experiments, we examined the motivational consequences of negative morality (vs. competence) evaluations in group contexts. Participants worked on …

  • The Progressive Values Scale

    Open Access•Travis Proulx, Vlad Costin et al.•ARTICLE•Personality and Social Psychology…•2023

    Progressivism has increasingly challenged traditional liberalism as the dominant influence within left-wing ideology. Across four studies, we developed a measure—the Progressive Values Scale (PVS)—that characterizes distinctly progressive values within the left-wing. In Study 1, left-wing participants evaluated divisive issues, with four scale factors emerging. In Study 2, we confirmed this factor structure and included a battery of personality a…

  • A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being

    Open Access•Suzanne Hoogeveen, Alexandra Sarafoglou et al.•ARTICLE•Religion Brain & Behavior•2023

    The relation between religiosity and well-being is one of the most researched topics in the psychology of religion, yet the directionality and robustness of the effect remains debated. Here, we adopted a many-analysts approach to assess the robustness of this relation based on a new cross-cultural dataset (N=10,535 participants from 24 countries). We recruited 120 analysis teams to investigate (1) whether religious people self-report higher well-…

  • From multiverse analysis to multiverse operationalisations

    Open Access•Paul H P Hanel, Natalia Zarzeczna•ARTICLE•Religion Brain & Behavior•2023

    Researchers are increasingly noticing the value of multiverse analysis. While such analysis is important, they should not neglect the impact of multiverse operationalisations on the outcome – that is, multiple ways of operationalising or measuring constructs such as well-being or religiosity. The “Many Analysts Religion Projects” (2022) found that different operationalisations of well-being impacted its association with religiosity. Here, we expa…

  • Science rejection in Greece

    Open Access•Bastiaan T Rutjens, Natalia Zarzeczna et al.•ARTICLE•Public Understanding of Science•2022

    Recent research has identified spirituality as an important contributor to vaccine scepticism and low faith in science, particularly in WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic) nations. In the present study, we further tested the generalizability of these findings in a religious South-Eastern European country – Greece, with more extensive measures of key constructs. We replicate previous work using measures of improved const…

  • Religious diversity in science

    Open Access•Carissa A Sharp, Carola Leicht et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 8

    Research shows that scientists tend to be less religious than the general population, and scientists’ religious affiliation and participation have declined over time (Ecklund & Park, 2009; Ecklund et al., 2008). Given the demographic differences between scientists and the general population, it was predicted that scientists who are religious would be regarded as having a counter-stereotypical combination of social identities. However, across five…

  • A group processes approach to antiscience beliefs and endorsement of “alternative facts”

    Open Access•Bastiaan T Rutjens, Sander Van Der Linden et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2021•Cited by: 3•References: 5

    The global spread of antiscience beliefs, misinformation, fake news, and conspiracy theories is posing a threat to the well-being of individuals and societies worldwide. Accordingly, research on why people increasingly doubt science and endorse “alternative facts” is flourishing. Much of this work has focused on identifying cognitive biases and individual differences. Importantly, however, the reasons that lead people to question mainstream scien…

  • Content Matters

    Open Access•Carola Leicht, Carissa A Sharp et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal for the…•2021•Cited by: 2•References: 10

    Science and religion are often portrayed as monolithic entities in perpetual and necessary conflict. We explore the extent to which perceptions of conflict or compatibility between science and religion are content dependent and are associated with participants’ own religious or non-religious social identities. In doing so, we develop a novel Science and Religion Conflict/Compatibility Scale. Across three studies (n = 1,506), we consistently find …

  • Sharing the Same Political Ideology Yet Endorsing Different Values

    Open Access•Paul H P Hanel, Natalia Zarzeczna et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychological and…•2019

    Members of extreme political groups are usually perceived as more homogeneous than moderates. We investigated whether members of the general public who share the same political ideology would exhibit different levels of heterogeneity in terms of human values across 20 European countries and Israel. We directly compared the variability across moderate-, left-, and right-wing groups. Our findings suggest that the values of more extreme (left-wing o…

  • A group processes approach to antiscience beliefs and endorsement of “alternative facts”

    Open Access•Bastiaan T Rutjens, Sander Van Der Linden et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2021•Cited by: 3•References: 5

    The global spread of antiscience beliefs, misinformation, fake news, and conspiracy theories is posing a threat to the well-being of individuals and societies worldwide. Accordingly, research on why people increasingly doubt science and endorse “alternative facts” is flourishing. Much of this work has focused on identifying cognitive biases and individual differences. Importantly, however, the reasons that lead people to question mainstream scien…

  • Psychological Distance to Science Affects Science Evaluations

    Open Access•Bojana Većkalov, Natalia Zarzeczna et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Social Issues•2025•Cited by: 2•References: 84

    In four experiments (three preregistered; N total = 4511), we investigated the influence of psychological distance to science (PSYDISC) on science evaluations. PSYDISC reflects the extent to which science is perceived as an (in)tangible undertaking conducted by people (dis)similar to oneself ( social ), with effects in the here (far away; spatial ) and now (in the distant future; temporal ), and as (un)useful and (in)applicable in the real world …

  • Content Matters

    Open Access•Carola Leicht, Carissa A Sharp et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal for the…•2021•Cited by: 2•References: 10

    Science and religion are often portrayed as monolithic entities in perpetual and necessary conflict. We explore the extent to which perceptions of conflict or compatibility between science and religion are content dependent and are associated with participants’ own religious or non-religious social identities. In doing so, we develop a novel Science and Religion Conflict/Compatibility Scale. Across three studies (n = 1,506), we consistently find …

  • Religious diversity in science

    Open Access•Carissa A Sharp, Carola Leicht et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 8

    Research shows that scientists tend to be less religious than the general population, and scientists’ religious affiliation and participation have declined over time (Ecklund & Park, 2009; Ecklund et al., 2008). Given the demographic differences between scientists and the general population, it was predicted that scientists who are religious would be regarded as having a counter-stereotypical combination of social identities. However, across five…

  • Sharing the Same Political Ideology Yet Endorsing Different Values

    Open Access•Paul H P Hanel, Natalia Zarzeczna et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychological and…•2019

    Members of extreme political groups are usually perceived as more homogeneous than moderates. We investigated whether members of the general public who share the same political ideology would exhibit different levels of heterogeneity in terms of human values across 20 European countries and Israel. We directly compared the variability across moderate-, left-, and right-wing groups. Our findings suggest that the values of more extreme (left-wing o…

  • Religious diversity in science

    Open Access•Carissa A Sharp, Carola Leicht et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 8

    Research shows that scientists tend to be less religious than the general population, and scientists’ religious affiliation and participation have declined over time (Ecklund & Park, 2009; Ecklund et al., 2008). Given the demographic differences between scientists and the general population, it was predicted that scientists who are religious would be regarded as having a counter-stereotypical combination of social identities. However, across five…

  • A group processes approach to antiscience beliefs and endorsement of “alternative facts”

    Open Access•Bastiaan T Rutjens, Sander Van Der Linden et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2021•Cited by: 3•References: 5

    The global spread of antiscience beliefs, misinformation, fake news, and conspiracy theories is posing a threat to the well-being of individuals and societies worldwide. Accordingly, research on why people increasingly doubt science and endorse “alternative facts” is flourishing. Much of this work has focused on identifying cognitive biases and individual differences. Importantly, however, the reasons that lead people to question mainstream scien…

  • Content Matters

    Open Access•Carola Leicht, Carissa A Sharp et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal for the…•2021•Cited by: 2•References: 10

    Science and religion are often portrayed as monolithic entities in perpetual and necessary conflict. We explore the extent to which perceptions of conflict or compatibility between science and religion are content dependent and are associated with participants’ own religious or non-religious social identities. In doing so, we develop a novel Science and Religion Conflict/Compatibility Scale. Across three studies (n = 1,506), we consistently find …

  • Science rejection in Greece

    Open Access•Bastiaan T Rutjens, Natalia Zarzeczna et al.•ARTICLE•Public Understanding of Science•2022

    Recent research has identified spirituality as an important contributor to vaccine scepticism and low faith in science, particularly in WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic) nations. In the present study, we further tested the generalizability of these findings in a religious South-Eastern European country – Greece, with more extensive measures of key constructs. We replicate previous work using measures of improved const…

  • The Progressive Values Scale

    Open Access•Travis Proulx, Vlad Costin et al.•ARTICLE•Personality and Social Psychology…•2023

    Progressivism has increasingly challenged traditional liberalism as the dominant influence within left-wing ideology. Across four studies, we developed a measure—the Progressive Values Scale (PVS)—that characterizes distinctly progressive values within the left-wing. In Study 1, left-wing participants evaluated divisive issues, with four scale factors emerging. In Study 2, we confirmed this factor structure and included a battery of personality a…

  • A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being

    Open Access•Suzanne Hoogeveen, Alexandra Sarafoglou et al.•ARTICLE•Religion Brain & Behavior•2023

    The relation between religiosity and well-being is one of the most researched topics in the psychology of religion, yet the directionality and robustness of the effect remains debated. Here, we adopted a many-analysts approach to assess the robustness of this relation based on a new cross-cultural dataset (N=10,535 participants from 24 countries). We recruited 120 analysis teams to investigate (1) whether religious people self-report higher well-…

  • From multiverse analysis to multiverse operationalisations

    Open Access•Paul H P Hanel, Natalia Zarzeczna•ARTICLE•Religion Brain & Behavior•2023

    Researchers are increasingly noticing the value of multiverse analysis. While such analysis is important, they should not neglect the impact of multiverse operationalisations on the outcome – that is, multiple ways of operationalising or measuring constructs such as well-being or religiosity. The “Many Analysts Religion Projects” (2022) found that different operationalisations of well-being impacted its association with religiosity. Here, we expa…

  • Psychological Distance to Science as a Predictor of Science Skepticism Across Domains

    Open Access•Bojana Većkalov, Natalia Zarzeczna et al.•ARTICLE•Personality and Social Psychology…•2024

    This article presents and tests psychological distance to science (PSYDISC) as a domain-general predictor of science skepticism. Drawing on the concept of psychological distance, PSYDISC reflects the extent to which individuals perceive science as a tangible undertaking conducted by people similar to oneself ( social), with effects in the here ( spatial) and now ( temporal), and as useful and applicable in the real world ( hypothetical distance).…

  • Threatened by the immoral, challenged by the incompetent

    Open Access•Romy van der Lee, Naomi Ellemers et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2024

    In group contexts, moral judgments are used as social influence tactics to regulate the behavior of group members. We argue that communicating moral disapproval with the aim of adapting group members’ behavior might backfire because it elicits (negative) threat rather than (positive) challenge. In two experiments, we examined the motivational consequences of negative morality (vs. competence) evaluations in group contexts. Participants worked on …

  • The feeling is not mutual

    Open Access•Natalia Zarzeczna, Jesse L Preston et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology of Religion and…•2025

    The aim of the present research was to examine the independent contribution of beliefs in science and religion, respectively, to perceptions of science–religion compatibility across diverse countries and religious groups. To assess this, we recruited participants from three countries (the United Kingdom, Netherlands, and Kazakhstan; N = 684) and presented them with measures of belief in science and religious belief as independent constructs, such…

  • Meaning in science as a response to existential threat

    Open Access•Natalia Zarzeczna, Jesse L Preston•ARTICLE•Psychology of Religion and…•2025

  • Psychological Distance to Science Affects Science Evaluations

    Open Access•Bojana Većkalov, Natalia Zarzeczna et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Social Issues•2025•Cited by: 2•References: 84

    In four experiments (three preregistered; N total = 4511), we investigated the influence of psychological distance to science (PSYDISC) on science evaluations. PSYDISC reflects the extent to which science is perceived as an (in)tangible undertaking conducted by people (dis)similar to oneself ( social ), with effects in the here (far away; spatial ) and now (in the distant future; temporal ), and as (un)useful and (in)applicable in the real world …

Psychology (12 works) · Social Psychology (12 works) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 works) · Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 works) · Sociology (5 works) · Political science (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae