Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Samuel R Gross

Biographic Data

ID5880597
NAMESamuel R Gross
GIVEN NAMESSamuel R
FAMILY NAMEGross
SIGNATUREGROSS S R
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Michigan
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS70
WORKS AS AUTHOR4
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1984
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2008
H-INDEX3
  • Convicting the Innocent

    Open Access•Samuel R Gross•ARTICLE•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2008•Cited by: 6•References: 1

    Almost everything we know about false convictions is based on exonerations in rape and murder cases, which together account for only 2% of felony convictions. Within that important but limited sphere we have learned a lot in the past 30 years; outside it, our ignorance is nearly complete. This review describes what we now know about convicting the innocent: estimates of the rate of false convictions among death sentences; common causes of false c…

  • Beyond Repair

    Open Access•Mark A Graber, Neal Devins et al.•BOOK•Beyond Repair?•2003

    Can the death penalty be administered in a just way—without executing the innocent, without regard to race, and without arbitrariness? How does capital punishment in the United States fit with international human rights law? These are among the questions that leading legal scholars and journalists explore in Beyond Repair? All new, the essays in this collection focus on the period since 1976, when the Supreme Court held that capital punishment, i…

  • Hardening of the Attitudes

    Open Access•Phoebe C Ellsworth, Samuel R Gross•ARTICLE•Journal of Social Issues•1994•Cited by: 51•References: 23

    American support for the death penalty has steadily increased since 1966, when opponents outnumbered supporters, and now in the mid‐1990s is at a near record high. Research over the last 20 years has tended to confirm the hypothesis that most people's death penalty attitudes (pro or con) are based on emotion rather than information or rational argument. People feel strongly about the death penalty, know little about it, and feel no need to know m…

  • Patterns of Death

    Samuel R Gross, Robert Mauro•ARTICLE•Stanford Law Review•1984•Cited by: 13

  • Hardening of the Attitudes

    Open Access•Phoebe C Ellsworth, Samuel R Gross•ARTICLE•Journal of Social Issues•1994•Cited by: 51•References: 23

    American support for the death penalty has steadily increased since 1966, when opponents outnumbered supporters, and now in the mid‐1990s is at a near record high. Research over the last 20 years has tended to confirm the hypothesis that most people's death penalty attitudes (pro or con) are based on emotion rather than information or rational argument. People feel strongly about the death penalty, know little about it, and feel no need to know m…

  • Patterns of Death

    Samuel R Gross, Robert Mauro•ARTICLE•Stanford Law Review•1984•Cited by: 13

  • Convicting the Innocent

    Open Access•Samuel R Gross•ARTICLE•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2008•Cited by: 6•References: 1

    Almost everything we know about false convictions is based on exonerations in rape and murder cases, which together account for only 2% of felony convictions. Within that important but limited sphere we have learned a lot in the past 30 years; outside it, our ignorance is nearly complete. This review describes what we now know about convicting the innocent: estimates of the rate of false convictions among death sentences; common causes of false c…

  • Patterns of Death

    Samuel R Gross, Robert Mauro•ARTICLE•Stanford Law Review•1984•Cited by: 13

  • Hardening of the Attitudes

    Open Access•Phoebe C Ellsworth, Samuel R Gross•ARTICLE•Journal of Social Issues•1994•Cited by: 51•References: 23

    American support for the death penalty has steadily increased since 1966, when opponents outnumbered supporters, and now in the mid‐1990s is at a near record high. Research over the last 20 years has tended to confirm the hypothesis that most people's death penalty attitudes (pro or con) are based on emotion rather than information or rational argument. People feel strongly about the death penalty, know little about it, and feel no need to know m…

  • Beyond Repair

    Open Access•Mark A Graber, Neal Devins et al.•BOOK•Beyond Repair?•2003

    Can the death penalty be administered in a just way—without executing the innocent, without regard to race, and without arbitrariness? How does capital punishment in the United States fit with international human rights law? These are among the questions that leading legal scholars and journalists explore in Beyond Repair? All new, the essays in this collection focus on the period since 1976, when the Supreme Court held that capital punishment, i…

  • Convicting the Innocent

    Open Access•Samuel R Gross•ARTICLE•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2008•Cited by: 6•References: 1

    Almost everything we know about false convictions is based on exonerations in rape and murder cases, which together account for only 2% of felony convictions. Within that important but limited sphere we have learned a lot in the past 30 years; outside it, our ignorance is nearly complete. This review describes what we now know about convicting the innocent: estimates of the rate of false convictions among death sentences; common causes of false c…

Criminology (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Medicine (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Deception detection and forensic psychology (2 works) · Homicide (2 works) · Jury (2 works) · Law (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae