T Marshall
Biographic Data
| ID | 5895618 |
|---|---|
| NAME | T Marshall |
| GIVEN NAMES | T |
| FAMILY NAME | Marshall |
| SIGNATURE | MARSHALL T |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Birmingham |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-5750-3974 |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 10 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1979 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2003 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Randomised controlled trial of the effect of evidence based information on women’s willingness to participate in cervical cancer screening
Study objectives: To assess whether providing women with additional information on the pros and cons of screening, compared with information currently offered by the NHS, affects their intention to attend for screening. Design: Randomised controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either the control, (based on an NHS Cervical Screening Programme leaflet currently used), or the intervention leaflet (containing additional info…
Discounting the future
Policymaking and the Modern Court
VAILABLE research offers strikingly different images of the Supreme Court's success as a policy-maker. On one hand, some accounts depict the Supreme Court as a powerful policy-maker, whose rulings are rarely overturned. Only six to nine Constitutional amendments have overturned specific Court rulings (Abraham 1980: 351-58; Library of Congress 1973: 1789-97, 1983: S332-33). Despite periodic Court-curbing efforts in Congress (Nagel 1965; Handberg a…
Evaluating Presidential Nominees
SINCE 1968 the presidential nominations process has been greatly changed by new party rules, federal election reforms, and the growth of openly contested primaries and caucuses. Although these changes have greatly increased the party rank-and-file's importance in deciding nominations, relatively little is yet known about how voters choose among the would-be nominees. This research note draws upon a series of nationwide polls taken during the 1980…
The Benevolent Bureaucrat
Party Responsibility Revisited
Evaluating Presidential Nominees
SINCE 1968 the presidential nominations process has been greatly changed by new party rules, federal election reforms, and the growth of openly contested primaries and caucuses. Although these changes have greatly increased the party rank-and-file's importance in deciding nominations, relatively little is yet known about how voters choose among the would-be nominees. This research note draws upon a series of nationwide polls taken during the 1980…
Randomised controlled trial of the effect of evidence based information on women’s willingness to participate in cervical cancer screening
Study objectives: To assess whether providing women with additional information on the pros and cons of screening, compared with information currently offered by the NHS, affects their intention to attend for screening. Design: Randomised controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either the control, (based on an NHS Cervical Screening Programme leaflet currently used), or the intervention leaflet (containing additional info…
Policymaking and the Modern Court
VAILABLE research offers strikingly different images of the Supreme Court's success as a policy-maker. On one hand, some accounts depict the Supreme Court as a powerful policy-maker, whose rulings are rarely overturned. Only six to nine Constitutional amendments have overturned specific Court rulings (Abraham 1980: 351-58; Library of Congress 1973: 1789-97, 1983: S332-33). Despite periodic Court-curbing efforts in Congress (Nagel 1965; Handberg a…
The Benevolent Bureaucrat
Party Responsibility Revisited
The Benevolent Bureaucrat
Evaluating Presidential Nominees
SINCE 1968 the presidential nominations process has been greatly changed by new party rules, federal election reforms, and the growth of openly contested primaries and caucuses. Although these changes have greatly increased the party rank-and-file's importance in deciding nominations, relatively little is yet known about how voters choose among the would-be nominees. This research note draws upon a series of nationwide polls taken during the 1980…
Policymaking and the Modern Court
VAILABLE research offers strikingly different images of the Supreme Court's success as a policy-maker. On one hand, some accounts depict the Supreme Court as a powerful policy-maker, whose rulings are rarely overturned. Only six to nine Constitutional amendments have overturned specific Court rulings (Abraham 1980: 351-58; Library of Congress 1973: 1789-97, 1983: S332-33). Despite periodic Court-curbing efforts in Congress (Nagel 1965; Handberg a…
Discounting the future
Randomised controlled trial of the effect of evidence based information on women’s willingness to participate in cervical cancer screening
Study objectives: To assess whether providing women with additional information on the pros and cons of screening, compared with information currently offered by the NHS, affects their intention to attend for screening. Design: Randomised controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either the control, (based on an NHS Cervical Screening Programme leaflet currently used), or the intervention leaflet (containing additional info…
Political science (4 works) · Law (3 works) · Medicine (2 works) · Politics (2 works) · Public Administration (2 works) · American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 works) · BRCA gene mutations in cancer (1 works) · Cancer (1 works) · Certiorari (1 works) · Cervical cancer (1 works)