Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Eddy Nahmias

Biographic Data

ID5911278
NAMEEddy Nahmias
GIVEN NAMESEddy
FAMILY NAMENahmias
SIGNATURENAHMIAS E
AFFILIATIONSGeorgia State University
ORCID0000-0003-0987-0160
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS9
TOTAL CITATIONS30
WORKS AS AUTHOR9
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2005
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX2
  • Why the manipulation argument fails

    Open Access•Oisín Deery, Eddy Nahmias•ARTICLE•Philosophical Studies•2023

  • The free will inventory

    Open Access•Thomas Nadelhoffer, Jason Shepard et al.•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•2014

  • Intuitions about Free Will, Determinism, and Bypassing

    Eddy Nahmias•CHAPTER•The Oxford handbook of free will•2012

    This article draws on experimental studies of folk intuitions about free will and moral responsibility conducted in the past decade. It questions the claims of many philosophers that most ordinary persons have incompatibilist intuitions about free will and moral responsibility. In the studies, various deterministic scenarios are presented to undergraduate students who have not studied philosophy. In these scenarios, studies found that, although s…

  • Explaining Away Incompatibilist Intuitions

    Open Access•Dylan Murray, Eddy Nahmias•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2012•Cited by: 8•References: 6

    The debate between compatibilists and incompatibilists depends in large part on what ordinary people mean by 'free will', a matter on which previous experimental philosophy studies have yielded conflicting results. In Nahmias, Morris, Nadelhoffer, and Turner (2005, 2006), most participants judged that agents in deterministic scenarios could have free will and be morally responsible. Nichols and Knobe (2007), though, suggest that these apparent co…

  • Temperament and intuition

    Open Access•Thomas Nadelhoffer, Trevor Kvaran et al.•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•2009

  • Folk Fears about Freedom and Responsibility

    Eddy Nahmias•ARTICLE•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2006•Cited by: 2•References: 4

    will and moral responsibility was designed primarily to test a common claim in the philosophical debates: that ordinary people see an obvious conflict between determinism and both free will and moral responsibility, and hence, the burden is on compatibilists to motivate their theory in a way that explains away or overcomes this intuitive support for incompatibilism. The evidence, if any, offered by philosophers to support the claim that incompati…

  • Is Incompatibilism Intuitive

    Open Access•Eddy Nahmias, Stephen G Morris et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2006•Cited by: 20•References: 6

    Incompatibilists believe free will is impossible if determinism is true, and they often claim that this view is supported by ordinary intuitions. We challenge the claim that incompatibilism is intuitive to most laypersons and discuss the significance of this challenge to the free will debate. After explaining why incompatibilists should want their view to accord with pretheoretical intuitions, we suggest that determining whether incompatibilism i…

  • Surveying Freedom

    Eddy Nahmias, Stephen Morris et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophical Psychology•2005

    Philosophers working in the nascent field of ‘experimental philosophy’ have begun using methods borrowed from psychology to collect data about folk intuitions concerning debates ranging from action theory to ethics to epistemology. In this paper we present the results of our attempts to apply this approach to the free will debate, in which philosophers on opposing sides claim that their view best accounts for and accords with folk intuitions. Aft…

  • Agency, authorship, and illusion

    Open Access•Eddy Nahmias•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•2005

  • Is Incompatibilism Intuitive

    Open Access•Eddy Nahmias, Stephen G Morris et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2006•Cited by: 20•References: 6

    Incompatibilists believe free will is impossible if determinism is true, and they often claim that this view is supported by ordinary intuitions. We challenge the claim that incompatibilism is intuitive to most laypersons and discuss the significance of this challenge to the free will debate. After explaining why incompatibilists should want their view to accord with pretheoretical intuitions, we suggest that determining whether incompatibilism i…

  • Explaining Away Incompatibilist Intuitions

    Open Access•Dylan Murray, Eddy Nahmias•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2012•Cited by: 8•References: 6

    The debate between compatibilists and incompatibilists depends in large part on what ordinary people mean by 'free will', a matter on which previous experimental philosophy studies have yielded conflicting results. In Nahmias, Morris, Nadelhoffer, and Turner (2005, 2006), most participants judged that agents in deterministic scenarios could have free will and be morally responsible. Nichols and Knobe (2007), though, suggest that these apparent co…

  • Folk Fears about Freedom and Responsibility

    Eddy Nahmias•ARTICLE•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2006•Cited by: 2•References: 4

    will and moral responsibility was designed primarily to test a common claim in the philosophical debates: that ordinary people see an obvious conflict between determinism and both free will and moral responsibility, and hence, the burden is on compatibilists to motivate their theory in a way that explains away or overcomes this intuitive support for incompatibilism. The evidence, if any, offered by philosophers to support the claim that incompati…

  • Surveying Freedom

    Eddy Nahmias, Stephen Morris et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophical Psychology•2005

    Philosophers working in the nascent field of ‘experimental philosophy’ have begun using methods borrowed from psychology to collect data about folk intuitions concerning debates ranging from action theory to ethics to epistemology. In this paper we present the results of our attempts to apply this approach to the free will debate, in which philosophers on opposing sides claim that their view best accounts for and accords with folk intuitions. Aft…

  • Agency, authorship, and illusion

    Open Access•Eddy Nahmias•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•2005

  • Folk Fears about Freedom and Responsibility

    Eddy Nahmias•ARTICLE•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2006•Cited by: 2•References: 4

    will and moral responsibility was designed primarily to test a common claim in the philosophical debates: that ordinary people see an obvious conflict between determinism and both free will and moral responsibility, and hence, the burden is on compatibilists to motivate their theory in a way that explains away or overcomes this intuitive support for incompatibilism. The evidence, if any, offered by philosophers to support the claim that incompati…

  • Is Incompatibilism Intuitive

    Open Access•Eddy Nahmias, Stephen G Morris et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2006•Cited by: 20•References: 6

    Incompatibilists believe free will is impossible if determinism is true, and they often claim that this view is supported by ordinary intuitions. We challenge the claim that incompatibilism is intuitive to most laypersons and discuss the significance of this challenge to the free will debate. After explaining why incompatibilists should want their view to accord with pretheoretical intuitions, we suggest that determining whether incompatibilism i…

  • Temperament and intuition

    Open Access•Thomas Nadelhoffer, Trevor Kvaran et al.•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•2009

  • Intuitions about Free Will, Determinism, and Bypassing

    Eddy Nahmias•CHAPTER•The Oxford handbook of free will•2012

    This article draws on experimental studies of folk intuitions about free will and moral responsibility conducted in the past decade. It questions the claims of many philosophers that most ordinary persons have incompatibilist intuitions about free will and moral responsibility. In the studies, various deterministic scenarios are presented to undergraduate students who have not studied philosophy. In these scenarios, studies found that, although s…

  • Explaining Away Incompatibilist Intuitions

    Open Access•Dylan Murray, Eddy Nahmias•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2012•Cited by: 8•References: 6

    The debate between compatibilists and incompatibilists depends in large part on what ordinary people mean by 'free will', a matter on which previous experimental philosophy studies have yielded conflicting results. In Nahmias, Morris, Nadelhoffer, and Turner (2005, 2006), most participants judged that agents in deterministic scenarios could have free will and be morally responsible. Nichols and Knobe (2007), though, suggest that these apparent co…

  • The free will inventory

    Open Access•Thomas Nadelhoffer, Jason Shepard et al.•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•2014

  • Why the manipulation argument fails

    Open Access•Oisín Deery, Eddy Nahmias•ARTICLE•Philosophical Studies•2023

Epistemology (8 works) · Free Will and Agency (8 works) · Philosophy (7 works) · Compatibilism (6 works) · Free will (6 works) · Psychology (6 works) · Determinism (5 works) · Incompatibilism (5 works) · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 works) · Experimental philosophy (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae