Matthew S Brogdon
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 5914871 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Matthew S Brogdon |
| NOMBRES | Matthew S |
| APELLIDO | Brogdon |
| FIRMA | BROGDON M S |
| AFILIACIONES | The University of Texas at San Antonio |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-5326-1285 |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 7 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 7 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 7 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2011 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2022 |
| ÍNDICE H | 1 |
Conscience, Consent, and a Multiplicity of Factions
Taking seriously Tocqueville’s admonition that colonial experience is the proper “point of departure” for understanding the American regime and its constitution, this essay examines the development of free exercise protections and disestablishment of religion in the foundational laws of the American colonies. Like other studies of church-state relations, this examination largely bears out Madison’s pithy analysis in The Federalist. “In a free gov…
The Formation of Judicial Federalism in the United States
The central feature of American judicial federalism is the Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction over state courts. Conventionally, we tend to view controversy over judicial federalism through the lens of the Jeffersonian and Jacksonian eras, in which this appellate oversight functioned to consolidate the power of national institutions against the periphery and defenders of states’ rights promoted the independence of state courts from federal ov…
Political Jurisprudence and the Role of the Supreme Court
The modern shift toward abstract review and discretionary jurisdiction has heightened perennial controversy over the role of the Supreme Court in constitutional politics. Through close analysis of the framers’ deliberations in the Federal Convention, this article seeks to shed light on that controversy. The institutional logic at work in the debate tasked the Court with settling conflict arising from the federal system and enforcing constitutiona…
Constitutional Text and Institutional Development
This article revisits the constitutional dimensions of the debate on inferior courts in the First Congress. The basic question in the debate revealed the contested character of the new constitutional order and probed the extent to which it constituted a displacement of the old confederation order. Advocates of extending the federal courts, led by James Madison and Fisher Ames, employed the text of Article III to insist on the constitutional neces…
Young Mr. Lincoln in Ford's Theater
In Young Mr. Lincoln, director John Ford and screenwriter Lamar Trotti engage an issue that is central to Ford's films and to Lincoln's political thought. That issue is the tension between individual greatness and the rule of law, a tension heightened in a democracy by the demos's passion for equality. In the film's portrayal of Lincoln, Ford and Trotti suggest a solution to this tension that is fundamentally consistent with the one Lincoln sugge…
The Contested Removal Power, 1789–2010
Journal Article The Contested Removal Power, 1789–2010 Get access The Contested Removal Power, 1789–2010 by J. David Alvis, Jeremy D. Bailey, and F. Flagg Taylor IV. Lawrence, Press of Kansas, 2013. 264 pp. $34.95. Matthew S. Brogdon Matthew S. Brogdon University of Texas at San Antonio Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Political Science Quarterly, Volume 129, Issue 4, Winter 2014, Pages 738–739, https://doi…
Defending the Union
This essay contends that we can better understand Andrew Jackson's distinctive account of federalism by looking outside the Jeffersonian and Jacksonian political traditions. More appropriate peers for Jackson, as a constitutional statesman, are John Marshall and Abraham Lincoln. Existing treatments of Jackson miss these connections because they focus primarily on his roles as party leader and reformer, to the neglect of his constitutional statesm…
Defending the Union
This essay contends that we can better understand Andrew Jackson's distinctive account of federalism by looking outside the Jeffersonian and Jacksonian political traditions. More appropriate peers for Jackson, as a constitutional statesman, are John Marshall and Abraham Lincoln. Existing treatments of Jackson miss these connections because they focus primarily on his roles as party leader and reformer, to the neglect of his constitutional statesm…
Political Jurisprudence and the Role of the Supreme Court
The modern shift toward abstract review and discretionary jurisdiction has heightened perennial controversy over the role of the Supreme Court in constitutional politics. Through close analysis of the framers’ deliberations in the Federal Convention, this article seeks to shed light on that controversy. The institutional logic at work in the debate tasked the Court with settling conflict arising from the federal system and enforcing constitutiona…
Constitutional Text and Institutional Development
This article revisits the constitutional dimensions of the debate on inferior courts in the First Congress. The basic question in the debate revealed the contested character of the new constitutional order and probed the extent to which it constituted a displacement of the old confederation order. Advocates of extending the federal courts, led by James Madison and Fisher Ames, employed the text of Article III to insist on the constitutional neces…
The Contested Removal Power, 1789–2010
Journal Article The Contested Removal Power, 1789–2010 Get access The Contested Removal Power, 1789–2010 by J. David Alvis, Jeremy D. Bailey, and F. Flagg Taylor IV. Lawrence, Press of Kansas, 2013. 264 pp. $34.95. Matthew S. Brogdon Matthew S. Brogdon University of Texas at San Antonio Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Political Science Quarterly, Volume 129, Issue 4, Winter 2014, Pages 738–739, https://doi…
Defending the Union
This essay contends that we can better understand Andrew Jackson's distinctive account of federalism by looking outside the Jeffersonian and Jacksonian political traditions. More appropriate peers for Jackson, as a constitutional statesman, are John Marshall and Abraham Lincoln. Existing treatments of Jackson miss these connections because they focus primarily on his roles as party leader and reformer, to the neglect of his constitutional statesm…
The Contested Removal Power, 1789–2010
Journal Article The Contested Removal Power, 1789–2010 Get access The Contested Removal Power, 1789–2010 by J. David Alvis, Jeremy D. Bailey, and F. Flagg Taylor IV. Lawrence, Press of Kansas, 2013. 264 pp. $34.95. Matthew S. Brogdon Matthew S. Brogdon University of Texas at San Antonio Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Political Science Quarterly, Volume 129, Issue 4, Winter 2014, Pages 738–739, https://doi…
Constitutional Text and Institutional Development
This article revisits the constitutional dimensions of the debate on inferior courts in the First Congress. The basic question in the debate revealed the contested character of the new constitutional order and probed the extent to which it constituted a displacement of the old confederation order. Advocates of extending the federal courts, led by James Madison and Fisher Ames, employed the text of Article III to insist on the constitutional neces…
Young Mr. Lincoln in Ford's Theater
In Young Mr. Lincoln, director John Ford and screenwriter Lamar Trotti engage an issue that is central to Ford's films and to Lincoln's political thought. That issue is the tension between individual greatness and the rule of law, a tension heightened in a democracy by the demos's passion for equality. In the film's portrayal of Lincoln, Ford and Trotti suggest a solution to this tension that is fundamentally consistent with the one Lincoln sugge…
Political Jurisprudence and the Role of the Supreme Court
The modern shift toward abstract review and discretionary jurisdiction has heightened perennial controversy over the role of the Supreme Court in constitutional politics. Through close analysis of the framers’ deliberations in the Federal Convention, this article seeks to shed light on that controversy. The institutional logic at work in the debate tasked the Court with settling conflict arising from the federal system and enforcing constitutiona…
The Formation of Judicial Federalism in the United States
The central feature of American judicial federalism is the Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction over state courts. Conventionally, we tend to view controversy over judicial federalism through the lens of the Jeffersonian and Jacksonian eras, in which this appellate oversight functioned to consolidate the power of national institutions against the periphery and defenders of states’ rights promoted the independence of state courts from federal ov…
Conscience, Consent, and a Multiplicity of Factions
Taking seriously Tocqueville’s admonition that colonial experience is the proper “point of departure” for understanding the American regime and its constitution, this essay examines the development of free exercise protections and disestablishment of religion in the foundational laws of the American colonies. Like other studies of church-state relations, this examination largely bears out Madison’s pithy analysis in The Federalist. “In a free gov…
Law (7 obras) · Political science (7 obras) · Politics (7 obras) · Law (6 obras) · American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 obras) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (4 obras) · Sociology (4 obras) · Legal and Constitutional Studies (3 obras) · Constitution (2 obras) · Constitutional law (2 obras)