Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Christoph Rößler

Biographic Data

ID5929906
NAMEChristoph Rößler
GIVEN NAMESChristoph
FAMILY NAMERößler
SIGNATURERÖSSLER C
AFFILIATIONSPhilipps University of Marburg
ORCID0000-0002-3468-2076
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS0
AUTHOR COUNT4
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX0
  • Probing the case for manufacturer liability for harms caused by judgment-proof consumers to others

    Open Access•Tim Friehe, Christoph Rößler et al.•ARTICLE•European Journal of Law and…•2023

    We study whether it is socially desirable to hold a monopolistic firm liable for the harm its potentially judgment-proof consumers inflict on third parties. Consumers’ judgment-proofness limits potential product differentiation by pooling different consumer types with uniform liability exposure. The firm’s safety choices are distorted in both regimes under consideration: consumer-only liability and residual-manufacturer liability. We find that re…

  • Damage Measures for Contract Breach when Buyers Have Reference-Dependent Preferences

    Tim Friehe, Christoph Rößler•ARTICLE•Journal of Institutional and…•2022

    Using the traditional law-and-economics production contract model with a fixed price, this paper analyzes the breach and reliance incentives that result from damage measures for breach of contract when buyers have reference-dependent preferences. We show that buyer's reference-dependent preferences can produce results at odds with the traditional portrayal. Importantly, we find that expectation damages are no longer generally superior to reliance…

  • Liability, morality, and image concerns in product accidents with third parties

    Open Access•Christoph Rößler, Tim Friehe•ARTICLE•European Journal of Law and…•2020

  • Care Levels, Settlement Outcomes, and the Sophistication of Present-Biased Plaintiffs

    Tim Friehe, Christoph Rößler•ARTICLE•Revue économique•2020•References: 3

    Dans cet article, nous considérons une action en responsabilité civile dans laquelle les parties prenantes au litige (demandeur et défendeur) sont potentiellement victimes du biais d’immédiateté. Il s’agit d’étudier, dans ce cadre, l’effort de précaution de l’auteur du dommage et les incitations des demandeurs, d’une part, à intenter une action en justice et, d’autre part, à être conciliants lors d’un éventuel règlement amiable. Les principaux ré…

No prominent works on this page.

  • Liability, morality, and image concerns in product accidents with third parties

    Open Access•Christoph Rößler, Tim Friehe•ARTICLE•European Journal of Law and…•2020

  • Care Levels, Settlement Outcomes, and the Sophistication of Present-Biased Plaintiffs

    Tim Friehe, Christoph Rößler•ARTICLE•Revue économique•2020•References: 3

    Dans cet article, nous considérons une action en responsabilité civile dans laquelle les parties prenantes au litige (demandeur et défendeur) sont potentiellement victimes du biais d’immédiateté. Il s’agit d’étudier, dans ce cadre, l’effort de précaution de l’auteur du dommage et les incitations des demandeurs, d’une part, à intenter une action en justice et, d’autre part, à être conciliants lors d’un éventuel règlement amiable. Les principaux ré…

  • Damage Measures for Contract Breach when Buyers Have Reference-Dependent Preferences

    Tim Friehe, Christoph Rößler•ARTICLE•Journal of Institutional and…•2022

    Using the traditional law-and-economics production contract model with a fixed price, this paper analyzes the breach and reliance incentives that result from damage measures for breach of contract when buyers have reference-dependent preferences. We show that buyer's reference-dependent preferences can produce results at odds with the traditional portrayal. Importantly, we find that expectation damages are no longer generally superior to reliance…

  • Probing the case for manufacturer liability for harms caused by judgment-proof consumers to others

    Open Access•Tim Friehe, Christoph Rößler et al.•ARTICLE•European Journal of Law and…•2023

    We study whether it is socially desirable to hold a monopolistic firm liable for the harm its potentially judgment-proof consumers inflict on third parties. Consumers’ judgment-proofness limits potential product differentiation by pooling different consumer types with uniform liability exposure. The firm’s safety choices are distorted in both regimes under consideration: consumer-only liability and residual-manufacturer liability. We find that re…

Law (4 works) · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (4 works) · Business (3 works) · Economics (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Finance (2 works) · Harm (2 works) · Insurance and Financial Risk Management (2 works) · Liability (2 works) · Microeconomics (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae