Gary Varner
Biographic Data
| ID | 5967391 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Gary Varner |
| GIVEN NAMES | Gary |
| FAMILY NAME | Varner |
| SIGNATURE | VARNER G |
| AFFILIATIONS | Texas A&M University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 21 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 7 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 21 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1985 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Conservation scholars' perspectives on the morality of trophy hunting for the sake of conservation
Trophy hunting is one of the most contentious issues in recent biodiversity conservation discourse, eliciting opposition and support for the practice. Ethical concerns are often at the heart of the debate. To investigate moral views about trophy hunting, we conducted an online survey of randomly selected scholars worldwide who had published on biodiversity conservation ( n = 2315). Scholars expressed divergent views on the moral acceptability of …
An Overview of Engineering Approaches to Improving Agricultural Animal Welfare
Introduction to the Special Edition on Engineering and Animal Ethics
Do Fish Feel Pain
Sustainability
Animal Rights
Book Review| April 01 2007 Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions Cass R. Sunstein and Martha C. Nussbaum, eds., Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. xi + 338 pp. Gary Varner Gary Varner Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2007) 116 (2): 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2006-040 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitt…
Life’s Intrinsic Value
In Nature's Interests
This book offers a powerful response to what Varner calls the two dogmas of environmental ethics-the assumptions that animal rights philosophies and anthropocentric views are each antithetical to sound environmental policy. Allowing that every living organism has interests which ought, other things being equal, to be protected, Varner contends that some interests take priority over others. He defends both a sentientist principle giving priority t…
In Nature’s Interests?
This book offers a powerful response to what Varner calls the “two dogmas of environmental ethics”--the assumptions that animal rights philosophies and anthropocentric views are each antithetical to sound environmental policy. Allowing that every living organism has interests which ought, other things being equal, to be protected, Varner contends that some interests take priority over others. He defends both a sentientist principle giving priorit…
A Wolf in the Garden
The Prospects for Consensus and Convergence in the Animal Rights Debate
Those who conduct research on animals and those who advocate on\nbehalf of animals have more in common than is generally supposed. A more\nnuanced understanding of the arguments defending animals' interest can help\nreplace the current politics of confrontation with a genuine\nconversation
What's wrong with animalby-products
In defense of the vegan ideal
Rejoinder to Kathryn Paxton George
The Animal Rights/Environmental Ethics Debate
Overtapped Oasis
No Holism without Pluralism
Congress, Consistency, and Environmental Law
Christopher Stone
Do Species Have Standing
The Schopenhauerian Challenge in Environmental Ethics
The Schopenhauerian Challenge in Environmental Ethics
Do Species Have Standing
Christopher Stone
Congress, Consistency, and Environmental Law
No Holism without Pluralism
Overtapped Oasis
The Animal Rights/Environmental Ethics Debate
The Prospects for Consensus and Convergence in the Animal Rights Debate
Those who conduct research on animals and those who advocate on\nbehalf of animals have more in common than is generally supposed. A more\nnuanced understanding of the arguments defending animals' interest can help\nreplace the current politics of confrontation with a genuine\nconversation
What's wrong with animalby-products
In defense of the vegan ideal
Rejoinder to Kathryn Paxton George
In Nature’s Interests?
This book offers a powerful response to what Varner calls the “two dogmas of environmental ethics”--the assumptions that animal rights philosophies and anthropocentric views are each antithetical to sound environmental policy. Allowing that every living organism has interests which ought, other things being equal, to be protected, Varner contends that some interests take priority over others. He defends both a sentientist principle giving priorit…
A Wolf in the Garden
In Nature's Interests
This book offers a powerful response to what Varner calls the two dogmas of environmental ethics-the assumptions that animal rights philosophies and anthropocentric views are each antithetical to sound environmental policy. Allowing that every living organism has interests which ought, other things being equal, to be protected, Varner contends that some interests take priority over others. He defends both a sentientist principle giving priority t…
Life’s Intrinsic Value
Sustainability
Animal Rights
Book Review| April 01 2007 Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions Cass R. Sunstein and Martha C. Nussbaum, eds., Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. xi + 338 pp. Gary Varner Gary Varner Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2007) 116 (2): 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2006-040 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitt…
Do Fish Feel Pain
An Overview of Engineering Approaches to Improving Agricultural Animal Welfare
Introduction to the Special Edition on Engineering and Animal Ethics
Conservation scholars' perspectives on the morality of trophy hunting for the sake of conservation
Trophy hunting is one of the most contentious issues in recent biodiversity conservation discourse, eliciting opposition and support for the practice. Ethical concerns are often at the heart of the debate. To investigate moral views about trophy hunting, we conducted an online survey of randomly selected scholars worldwide who had published on biodiversity conservation ( n = 2315). Scholars expressed divergent views on the moral acceptability of …
Philosophy (15 works) · Epistemology (14 works) · Contemporary philosophy (12 works) · General interest (12 works) · Applied philosophy (11 works) · Political science (11 works) · Environmental ethics (9 works) · Sociology (9 works) · Law (8 works) · Animal rights (5 works)