Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Murray J Kiteley

Biographic Data

ID5969209
NAMEMurray J Kiteley
GIVEN NAMESMurray J
FAMILY NAMEKiteley
SIGNATUREKITELEY M J
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS2
TOTAL CITATIONS2
WORKS AS AUTHOR2
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1962
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1962
H-INDEX1
  • Walter Burley’s de Relativis

    Herman Shapiro, Murray Kiteley et al.•ARTICLE•Franciscan studies•1962•References: 1

    WALTER BURLEY’S DE RELATIVIS I The following edition of W alter Burley’s little tract, De Relativis, is based upon the only two copies of the work known to the present editors to be extant. One copy, designated in our apparatus as M , appears in Cod. Vat. lat. 2146, fols. 248ra— 249va; the siglum P represents an edition printed at Oxford in the year 1518.1 In this latter work, Burley’s De Relativis occurs on fols.3V— jr . Neither copy is perfect:…

  • Postulates and Meaning

    Open Access•Edward H Madden, Murray Kiteley et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1962•Cited by: 2•References: 3

    Most philosophers of science nowadays hold a network or postulational view of the meaning of theoretical words. However, there are many nuances to this view, and after explicitly separating them, we show what we take to be wrong with each one. While we reject the postulational view we do not defend its traditional alternatives either; rather we show the pointlessness of insisting on a single source for the meaning of theoretical words. We also po…

  • Postulates and Meaning

    Open Access•Edward H Madden, Murray Kiteley et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1962•Cited by: 2•References: 3

    Most philosophers of science nowadays hold a network or postulational view of the meaning of theoretical words. However, there are many nuances to this view, and after explicitly separating them, we show what we take to be wrong with each one. While we reject the postulational view we do not defend its traditional alternatives either; rather we show the pointlessness of insisting on a single source for the meaning of theoretical words. We also po…

  • Walter Burley’s de Relativis

    Herman Shapiro, Murray Kiteley et al.•ARTICLE•Franciscan studies•1962•References: 1

    WALTER BURLEY’S DE RELATIVIS I The following edition of W alter Burley’s little tract, De Relativis, is based upon the only two copies of the work known to the present editors to be extant. One copy, designated in our apparatus as M , appears in Cod. Vat. lat. 2146, fols. 248ra— 249va; the siglum P represents an edition printed at Oxford in the year 1518.1 In this latter work, Burley’s De Relativis occurs on fols.3V— jr . Neither copy is perfect:…

  • Postulates and Meaning

    Open Access•Edward H Madden, Murray Kiteley et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1962•Cited by: 2•References: 3

    Most philosophers of science nowadays hold a network or postulational view of the meaning of theoretical words. However, there are many nuances to this view, and after explicitly separating them, we show what we take to be wrong with each one. While we reject the postulational view we do not defend its traditional alternatives either; rather we show the pointlessness of insisting on a single source for the meaning of theoretical words. We also po…

Philosophy (2 works) · Art (1 work) · Biology (1 work) · Classics (1 work) · Classics (1 work) · Collation (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Epistemology (1 work) · Extant taxon (1 work) · Historical and Literary Studies (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae