Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cindy Stern

Biographic Data

ID5969262
NAMECindy Stern
GIVEN NAMESCindy
FAMILY NAMEStern
SIGNATURESTERN C
AFFILIATIONSThe University of Adelaide
ORCID0000-0002-0924-5042
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS2
WORKS AS AUTHOR6
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1978
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX1
  • Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews

    Donald Pollock, Danielle Pollock et al.•ARTICLE•JBI Evidence Synthesis•2023

    Scoping reviewers often face challenges in the extraction, analysis, and presentation of scoping review results. Using best-practice examples and drawing on the expertise of the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group and an editor of a journal that publishes scoping reviews, this paper expands on existing JBI scoping review guidance. The aim of this article is to clarify the process of extracting data from different sources of evidence; discuss wha…

  • Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews

    Cindy Stern, Lucylynn Lizarondo et al.•ARTICLE•JBI Evidence Synthesis•2020

  • What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences

    Open Access•Zachary Munn, Cindy Stern et al.•ARTICLE•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2018

  • Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

    Open Access•Zachary Munn, Micah D J Peters et al.•ARTICLE•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2018

  • Developing the Review Question and Inclusion Criteria

    Cindy Stern, Zoe Jordan et al.•ARTICLE•AJN American Journal of Nursing•2014

  • On the Alleged Extensionality of “Causal Explanatory Contexts”

    Open Access•Cindy Stern, Cindy D Stern•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1978•Cited by: 2•References: 4

    In a recent paper, Michael Levin argues that both statements reporting causal relations and causal explanatory statements are extensional. We show that his argument for the extensionality of causal explanatory statements fails to establish that conclusion. His claim that certain ‘because’ statements are elliptical for statements of what he terms the ‘causal explanatory’ form is unsubstantiated. The argument for the referential transparency of the…

  • On the Alleged Extensionality of “Causal Explanatory Contexts”

    Open Access•Cindy Stern, Cindy D Stern•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1978•Cited by: 2•References: 4

    In a recent paper, Michael Levin argues that both statements reporting causal relations and causal explanatory statements are extensional. We show that his argument for the extensionality of causal explanatory statements fails to establish that conclusion. His claim that certain ‘because’ statements are elliptical for statements of what he terms the ‘causal explanatory’ form is unsubstantiated. The argument for the referential transparency of the…

  • On the Alleged Extensionality of “Causal Explanatory Contexts”

    Open Access•Cindy Stern, Cindy D Stern•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1978•Cited by: 2•References: 4

    In a recent paper, Michael Levin argues that both statements reporting causal relations and causal explanatory statements are extensional. We show that his argument for the extensionality of causal explanatory statements fails to establish that conclusion. His claim that certain ‘because’ statements are elliptical for statements of what he terms the ‘causal explanatory’ form is unsubstantiated. The argument for the referential transparency of the…

  • Developing the Review Question and Inclusion Criteria

    Cindy Stern, Zoe Jordan et al.•ARTICLE•AJN American Journal of Nursing•2014

  • What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences

    Open Access•Zachary Munn, Cindy Stern et al.•ARTICLE•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2018

  • Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

    Open Access•Zachary Munn, Micah D J Peters et al.•ARTICLE•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2018

  • Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews

    Cindy Stern, Lucylynn Lizarondo et al.•ARTICLE•JBI Evidence Synthesis•2020

  • Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews

    Donald Pollock, Danielle Pollock et al.•ARTICLE•JBI Evidence Synthesis•2023

    Scoping reviewers often face challenges in the extraction, analysis, and presentation of scoping review results. Using best-practice examples and drawing on the expertise of the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group and an editor of a journal that publishes scoping reviews, this paper expands on existing JBI scoping review guidance. The aim of this article is to clarify the process of extracting data from different sources of evidence; discuss wha…

Computer Science (2 works) · Argument (complex analysis) (1 work) · Attribution (1 work) · Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 work) · Best practice (1 work) · Causal model (1 work) · Causation (1 work) · Data extraction (1 work) · Data science (1 work) · Delphi Technique in Research (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae