Anna Leuschner
Biographic Data
| ID | 5969658 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Anna Leuschner |
| GIVEN NAMES | Anna |
| FAMILY NAME | Leuschner |
| SIGNATURE | LEUSCHNER A |
| AFFILIATIONS | Leibniz University Hannover |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 25 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2012 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Exploring the limits of dissent
The shooting bias hypothesis aims to explain the disproportionate number of minorities killed by police. We present the evidence mounting in support of the existence of shooting bias and then focus on two dissenting studies. We examine these studies in light of Biddle and Leuschner’s (2015) “inductive risk account of epistemically detrimental dissent” and conclude that, although they meet this account only partially, the studies are in fact epist…
How Dissent on Gender Bias in Academia Affects Science and Society
Gender bias is a recalcitrant problem in academia and society. However, dissent has been created on this issue. We focus on dissenting studies by Stephen J. Ceci and Wendy M. Williams, arguing that they reach conclusions that are unwarranted on the basis of the available evidence and that they ignore fundamental objections to their methodological decisions. Drawing on discussions from other contexts, particularly on manufactured dissent concernin…
Is it appropriate to ‘target’ inappropriate dissent? on the normative consequences of climate skepticism
Social exclusion in academia through biases in methodological quality evaluation
Die Glaubwürdigkeit der Wissenschaft
Die Klimaforschung steht als politisch relevante Wissenschaft unter dem Druck, schnell Resultate zu liefern. - Und wo diese Resultate kontrovers sind, entsteht in der Öffentlichkeit rasch der Eindruck mangelnder Glaubwürdigkeit. Dieses Glaubwürdigkeitsproblem wurzelt einerseits in klassischen erkenntnis- und wissenschaftstheoretischen Schwierigkeiten wie Induktionsproblem, Unterbestimmtheitsthese und Theoriebeladenheit, andererseits in einer fehl…
Pluralism and objectivity
Pluralism and objectivity
Is it appropriate to ‘target’ inappropriate dissent? on the normative consequences of climate skepticism
How Dissent on Gender Bias in Academia Affects Science and Society
Gender bias is a recalcitrant problem in academia and society. However, dissent has been created on this issue. We focus on dissenting studies by Stephen J. Ceci and Wendy M. Williams, arguing that they reach conclusions that are unwarranted on the basis of the available evidence and that they ignore fundamental objections to their methodological decisions. Drawing on discussions from other contexts, particularly on manufactured dissent concernin…
Exploring the limits of dissent
The shooting bias hypothesis aims to explain the disproportionate number of minorities killed by police. We present the evidence mounting in support of the existence of shooting bias and then focus on two dissenting studies. We examine these studies in light of Biddle and Leuschner’s (2015) “inductive risk account of epistemically detrimental dissent” and conclude that, although they meet this account only partially, the studies are in fact epist…
Social exclusion in academia through biases in methodological quality evaluation
Die Glaubwürdigkeit der Wissenschaft
Die Klimaforschung steht als politisch relevante Wissenschaft unter dem Druck, schnell Resultate zu liefern. - Und wo diese Resultate kontrovers sind, entsteht in der Öffentlichkeit rasch der Eindruck mangelnder Glaubwürdigkeit. Dieses Glaubwürdigkeitsproblem wurzelt einerseits in klassischen erkenntnis- und wissenschaftstheoretischen Schwierigkeiten wie Induktionsproblem, Unterbestimmtheitsthese und Theoriebeladenheit, andererseits in einer fehl…
Pluralism and objectivity
Social exclusion in academia through biases in methodological quality evaluation
Is it appropriate to ‘target’ inappropriate dissent? on the normative consequences of climate skepticism
How Dissent on Gender Bias in Academia Affects Science and Society
Gender bias is a recalcitrant problem in academia and society. However, dissent has been created on this issue. We focus on dissenting studies by Stephen J. Ceci and Wendy M. Williams, arguing that they reach conclusions that are unwarranted on the basis of the available evidence and that they ignore fundamental objections to their methodological decisions. Drawing on discussions from other contexts, particularly on manufactured dissent concernin…
Exploring the limits of dissent
The shooting bias hypothesis aims to explain the disproportionate number of minorities killed by police. We present the evidence mounting in support of the existence of shooting bias and then focus on two dissenting studies. We examine these studies in light of Biddle and Leuschner’s (2015) “inductive risk account of epistemically detrimental dissent” and conclude that, although they meet this account only partially, the studies are in fact epist…
Philosophy (6 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Law (5 works) · Political science (5 works) · Sociology (5 works) · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (4 works) · Climate Change and Geoengineering (3 works) · Climate Change Communication and Perception (3 works) · Dissent (3 works) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 works)