Janggeun Lee
Biographic Data
| ID | 5986408 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Janggeun Lee |
| GIVEN NAMES | Janggeun |
| FAMILY NAME | Lee |
| SIGNATURE | LEE J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Dongguk University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-0723-3718 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 3 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 7 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
The Interplay of Agenda Building and Agenda Setting Across Policy, Media, and Public Agendas
This study explores the dynamics of agenda-setting among policy institutions, news media, and the public within a hyperconnected media environment. We analyzed government briefings and news content from 2023, alongside survey data on public agendas in South Korea. Our network-based modeling revealed positive correlations among the three agendas. Significantly, news media emerged as a crucial factor in issue ownership, with the public displaying a…
Effects of News‐Bothers‐Me on News Media Use and Political Knowledge
Objectives This study introduces the concept of news‐bothers‐me perception (NBMP) and examines how its two dimensions—annoyance due to news overload and annoyance due to perceived news bias—shape news media use and political knowledge in a high‐choice digital media environment. Methods Drawing on two waves of a national online panel survey of South Korean adults (N = 1,175) conducted prior to the 2022 presidential election, we employed autoregres…
The Corrective Effect of Fact-Checking and Hostile Media Perceptions
With the proliferation of fake news and misinformation, fact-checking journalism is booming worldwide. However, whether its corrective effect is still valid and generalizable in daily news consumption settings outside the laboratory requires further investigation. In addition, some partisans argue that the content of fact-checking news has a partisan bias that makes it unfavorable to particular political figures or parties. This perceived bias i…
Exploring the Paradox of Cross-Cutting Exposure and Affective Polarization
Previous research provides mixed results on how exposure to counter-attitudinal information (i.e. cross-cutting exposure) affects political polarization. Our study examines two theoretical models (i.e. linear and curvilinear) in the relationship between cross-cutting exposure and affective polarization. Using two waves of national panel data conducted in South Korea, the findings suggest that cross-cutting exposure affects partisans’ affective po…
Impact of the Newspaper in Education Program and Parental Mediation on Adolescents’ Social Participation
This study examines adolescents’ media use after receiving media education, specifically, media education received through Newspaper in Education (NIE) at school and parental mediation at home. The study verifies whether media education stimulates social participation by analyzing adolescents’ self-expression. Data collected through the Korea Press Foundation’s 2019 survey on media use among students aged 10 to 18 in Korea ( N = 1,905) were analy…
The effects of disagreement and unfriending on political polarization
Cross-cutting discussion is the foundation of deliberative democracy. However, previous research has reported inconsistent results regarding the effects of exposure to dissimilar perspectives on political polarization. This study aims to extend the literature by exploring how cross-cutting discussion influences affective polarization through unfriending and how this indirect effect is contingent upon exposure to incivility. The study analyzes pan…
Unfriending effects
The effects of disagreement and unfriending on political polarization
Cross-cutting discussion is the foundation of deliberative democracy. However, previous research has reported inconsistent results regarding the effects of exposure to dissimilar perspectives on political polarization. This study aims to extend the literature by exploring how cross-cutting discussion influences affective polarization through unfriending and how this indirect effect is contingent upon exposure to incivility. The study analyzes pan…
Unfriending effects
The effects of disagreement and unfriending on political polarization
Cross-cutting discussion is the foundation of deliberative democracy. However, previous research has reported inconsistent results regarding the effects of exposure to dissimilar perspectives on political polarization. This study aims to extend the literature by exploring how cross-cutting discussion influences affective polarization through unfriending and how this indirect effect is contingent upon exposure to incivility. The study analyzes pan…
Impact of the Newspaper in Education Program and Parental Mediation on Adolescents’ Social Participation
This study examines adolescents’ media use after receiving media education, specifically, media education received through Newspaper in Education (NIE) at school and parental mediation at home. The study verifies whether media education stimulates social participation by analyzing adolescents’ self-expression. Data collected through the Korea Press Foundation’s 2019 survey on media use among students aged 10 to 18 in Korea ( N = 1,905) were analy…
The Corrective Effect of Fact-Checking and Hostile Media Perceptions
With the proliferation of fake news and misinformation, fact-checking journalism is booming worldwide. However, whether its corrective effect is still valid and generalizable in daily news consumption settings outside the laboratory requires further investigation. In addition, some partisans argue that the content of fact-checking news has a partisan bias that makes it unfavorable to particular political figures or parties. This perceived bias i…
Exploring the Paradox of Cross-Cutting Exposure and Affective Polarization
Previous research provides mixed results on how exposure to counter-attitudinal information (i.e. cross-cutting exposure) affects political polarization. Our study examines two theoretical models (i.e. linear and curvilinear) in the relationship between cross-cutting exposure and affective polarization. Using two waves of national panel data conducted in South Korea, the findings suggest that cross-cutting exposure affects partisans’ affective po…
The Interplay of Agenda Building and Agenda Setting Across Policy, Media, and Public Agendas
This study explores the dynamics of agenda-setting among policy institutions, news media, and the public within a hyperconnected media environment. We analyzed government briefings and news content from 2023, alongside survey data on public agendas in South Korea. Our network-based modeling revealed positive correlations among the three agendas. Significantly, news media emerged as a crucial factor in issue ownership, with the public displaying a…
Effects of News‐Bothers‐Me on News Media Use and Political Knowledge
Objectives This study introduces the concept of news‐bothers‐me perception (NBMP) and examines how its two dimensions—annoyance due to news overload and annoyance due to perceived news bias—shape news media use and political knowledge in a high‐choice digital media environment. Methods Drawing on two waves of a national online panel survey of South Korean adults (N = 1,175) conducted prior to the 2022 presidential election, we employed autoregres…
Politics (6 works) · Social Media and Politics (6 works) · Psychology (5 works) · Political science (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Social media (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (2 works) · Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 works)