Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Gillian Lester

Biographic Data

ID5990119
NAMEGillian Lester
GIVEN NAMESGillian
FAMILY NAMELester
SIGNATURELESTER G
AFFILIATIONS,
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS2
WORKS AS AUTHOR4
WORKS AS EDITOR2
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1998
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX1
  • The Oxford Handbook of the Law of Work

    Guy Davidov, Brian Langille et al.•EDITOR•BOOK•The Oxford Handbook of the Law of…•2024

    At the core of all societies and economies are human beings deploying their energies and talents in productive activities—that is, at work. The law governing human productive activity is a large part of what determines outcomes in terms of social justice, material wellbeing, and the sustainability of both. It is hardly surprising, therefore, that work is heavily regulated. This book is about the ‘law of work’, a term that includes legislation set…

  • Philosophical Foundations of Labour Law

    Hugh Collins, Gillian Lester et al.•EDITOR•BOOK•Philosophical Foundations of…•2018

  • Left Legalism/Left Critique

    Open Access•Drucilla Cornell, Lauren Berlant et al.•BOOK•Left Legalism/Left Critique•2002

  • Unemployment Insurance and Wealth Redistribution

    Open Access•Gillian Lester, Gillian L L Lester•ARTICLE•SSRN Electronic Journal•2001

  • "Jumping to Conclusions in "Jumping the Queue

    Andrew Weis, Mark Kelman et al.•ARTICLE•Stanford Law Review•1998

    In this review, Andrew Weis critically examines Mark Kelman and Gillian Lester's Jumping the Queue. An Inquiry into the Legal Treatment of Students with Learning Disabilities. Writing from the perspective of an individual who has a learning disability, Weis disputes Kelman and Lester's contention that people with learning disabilities should not qualify as a rights protected group. Weis begins by identifying four main arguments underlying Kelman …

  • Careers and Contingency

    Gillian Lester•ARTICLE•Stanford Law Review•1998•Cited by: 2

    Disagreement among legal scholars over the phenomenon of employment-work having limited hours, duration, or security-has led to disparate prescriptions for legal reform. For some, the best solution would be to either leave the market alone, or eliminate existing regulations that drive employers to create jobs. Others believe current regulations do not go far enough and advocate reforms ranging from expanding mandatory benefits and protections to …

  • Careers and Contingency

    Gillian Lester•ARTICLE•Stanford Law Review•1998•Cited by: 2

    Disagreement among legal scholars over the phenomenon of employment-work having limited hours, duration, or security-has led to disparate prescriptions for legal reform. For some, the best solution would be to either leave the market alone, or eliminate existing regulations that drive employers to create jobs. Others believe current regulations do not go far enough and advocate reforms ranging from expanding mandatory benefits and protections to …

  • "Jumping to Conclusions in "Jumping the Queue

    Andrew Weis, Mark Kelman et al.•ARTICLE•Stanford Law Review•1998

    In this review, Andrew Weis critically examines Mark Kelman and Gillian Lester's Jumping the Queue. An Inquiry into the Legal Treatment of Students with Learning Disabilities. Writing from the perspective of an individual who has a learning disability, Weis disputes Kelman and Lester's contention that people with learning disabilities should not qualify as a rights protected group. Weis begins by identifying four main arguments underlying Kelman …

  • Careers and Contingency

    Gillian Lester•ARTICLE•Stanford Law Review•1998•Cited by: 2

    Disagreement among legal scholars over the phenomenon of employment-work having limited hours, duration, or security-has led to disparate prescriptions for legal reform. For some, the best solution would be to either leave the market alone, or eliminate existing regulations that drive employers to create jobs. Others believe current regulations do not go far enough and advocate reforms ranging from expanding mandatory benefits and protections to …

  • Unemployment Insurance and Wealth Redistribution

    Open Access•Gillian Lester, Gillian L L Lester•ARTICLE•SSRN Electronic Journal•2001

  • Left Legalism/Left Critique

    Open Access•Drucilla Cornell, Lauren Berlant et al.•BOOK•Left Legalism/Left Critique•2002

  • Philosophical Foundations of Labour Law

    Hugh Collins, Gillian Lester et al.•EDITOR•BOOK•Philosophical Foundations of…•2018

  • The Oxford Handbook of the Law of Work

    Guy Davidov, Brian Langille et al.•EDITOR•BOOK•The Oxford Handbook of the Law of…•2024

    At the core of all societies and economies are human beings deploying their energies and talents in productive activities—that is, at work. The law governing human productive activity is a large part of what determines outcomes in terms of social justice, material wellbeing, and the sustainability of both. It is hardly surprising, therefore, that work is heavily regulated. This book is about the ‘law of work’, a term that includes legislation set…

Political science (3 works) · Law (2 works) · Political Economy and Marxism (2 works) · Politics (2 works) · Comparative law (1 work) · Computer network (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Contingency (1 work) · Democracy (1 work) · Demographic economics (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae