Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Nicholas Tebben

Biographic Data

ID5995224
NAMENicholas Tebben
GIVEN NAMESNicholas
FAMILY NAMETebben
SIGNATURETEBBEN N
AFFILIATIONSTowson University
ORCID0000-0002-8047-7989
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS4
WORKS AS AUTHOR7
WORKS AS EDITOR1
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2014
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX1
  • Expert testimony and practical interests

    Nicholas Tebben, John Philip Waterman•ARTICLE•Inquiry•2024

    We argue that one is likely to accept what a speaker says when the expected utility of accepting their testimony is greater than the expected utility of continuing inquiry. One virtue of our hypothesis is that it allows us to explain why confidence in experts has declined in recent years. In a traditional media landscape expert testimony is easy to find, and alternative sources of information are relatively costly to access. Hence, practical cons…

  • The Community of Rational Beings

    Nicholas Tebben•CHAPTER•Ethics, Practical Reasoning, Agency•2022

    Sellars's moral theory is explicitly Kantian, but he despaired of providing a justification for morality that mirrors Kant's. This chapter argues that Sellars has the resources to provide such a justification. To act immorally, on the view developed here, is to act against one's own nature. It is, in a way, to deny that one is a person. And so, the necessity of respecting the moral law comes from the necessity of respecting oneself.

  • Realism, inferential semantics, and the truth norm

    Open Access•Nicholas Tebben•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•References: 23

  • Selfless assertions and the Knowledge Norm

    Open Access•Nicholas Tebben•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•References: 23

  • Belief isn’t voluntary, but commitment is

    Open Access•Nicholas Tebben•ARTICLE•Synthese•2018•Cited by: 3•References: 19

  • Meaning Without Representation

    Steven Gro, Michael J Williams et al.•EDITOR•BOOK•Meaning Without Representation•2015

  • Meaning Without Representation

    Michael Williams, Nicholas Tebben et al.•BOOK•Meaning Without Representation•2015

    Much contemporary thinking about language is animated by the idea that the core function of language is to represent how the world is and that therefore the notion of representation should play a fundamental explanatory role in any explanation of language and language use. Leading thinkers in the field explore various ways this idea may be challenged as well as obstacles to developing various forms of anti-representationalism. Particular attentio…

  • Deontology and doxastic control

    Open Access•Nicholas Tebben•ARTICLE•Synthese•2014•Cited by: 1•References: 7

  • Belief isn’t voluntary, but commitment is

    Open Access•Nicholas Tebben•ARTICLE•Synthese•2018•Cited by: 3•References: 19

  • Deontology and doxastic control

    Open Access•Nicholas Tebben•ARTICLE•Synthese•2014•Cited by: 1•References: 7

  • Deontology and doxastic control

    Open Access•Nicholas Tebben•ARTICLE•Synthese•2014•Cited by: 1•References: 7

  • Meaning Without Representation

    Steven Gro, Michael J Williams et al.•EDITOR•BOOK•Meaning Without Representation•2015

  • Meaning Without Representation

    Michael Williams, Nicholas Tebben et al.•BOOK•Meaning Without Representation•2015

    Much contemporary thinking about language is animated by the idea that the core function of language is to represent how the world is and that therefore the notion of representation should play a fundamental explanatory role in any explanation of language and language use. Leading thinkers in the field explore various ways this idea may be challenged as well as obstacles to developing various forms of anti-representationalism. Particular attentio…

  • Belief isn’t voluntary, but commitment is

    Open Access•Nicholas Tebben•ARTICLE•Synthese•2018•Cited by: 3•References: 19

  • Realism, inferential semantics, and the truth norm

    Open Access•Nicholas Tebben•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•References: 23

  • Selfless assertions and the Knowledge Norm

    Open Access•Nicholas Tebben•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•References: 23

  • The Community of Rational Beings

    Nicholas Tebben•CHAPTER•Ethics, Practical Reasoning, Agency•2022

    Sellars's moral theory is explicitly Kantian, but he despaired of providing a justification for morality that mirrors Kant's. This chapter argues that Sellars has the resources to provide such a justification. To act immorally, on the view developed here, is to act against one's own nature. It is, in a way, to deny that one is a person. And so, the necessity of respecting the moral law comes from the necessity of respecting oneself.

  • Expert testimony and practical interests

    Nicholas Tebben, John Philip Waterman•ARTICLE•Inquiry•2024

    We argue that one is likely to accept what a speaker says when the expected utility of accepting their testimony is greater than the expected utility of continuing inquiry. One virtue of our hypothesis is that it allows us to explain why confidence in experts has declined in recent years. In a traditional media landscape expert testimony is easy to find, and alternative sources of information are relatively costly to access. Hence, practical cons…

Epistemology (6 works) · Philosophy (6 works) · Computer Science (5 works) · Metaphysics (4 works) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 works) · Philosophy of language (4 works) · Philosophy of science (4 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Artificial Intelligence (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae