Daniela Vacek
Biographic Data
| ID | 5995267 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Daniela Vacek |
| GIVEN NAMES | Daniela |
| FAMILY NAME | Vacek |
| SIGNATURE | VACEK D |
| AFFILIATIONS | Slovak Academy of Sciences |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-4189-9281 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 7 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Responsible artificial intelligence
Although the phrase “responsible AI” is widely used in the AI industry, its meaning remains unclear. One can make sense of it indirectly, insofar as various notions of responsibility unproblematically attach to those involved in the creation and operation of AI technologies. It is less clear, however, whether the phrase makes sense when understood directly, that is, as the ascription of some sort of responsibility to AI systems themselves. This p…
Meeting the AI achievement challenge
The present paper tackles what we might call the AI achievement challenge , which has been the subject of recent debate in AI ethics. The challenge concerns the question of whether there are any achievement gaps due to artificial intelligence and what we should do if there are: how to fill them, or what policies are needed to decrease their impact on us if they cannot be filled. This paper argues that none of the proposed views is entirely satisf…
The hyperintensionality of art
Daniel Nolan successfully predicted a hyperintensional revolution in metaphysics in his 2014 paper ‘Hyperintensional Metaphysicsʼ. He argued that hyperintensionality is not restricted to representations. However, it seems that one of the most promising candidates for non-representational hyperintensionality has not yet been considered as such: art. We will argue that art can provide a rather strong case for non-representational hyperintensionalit…
Making Sense of Vicarious Responsibility
Vicarious responsibility is a notoriously puzzling notion in normative reasoning. In this article we will explore two fundamental issues, which we will call the “explication problem” and the “justification problem”. The former issue concerns how vicarious responsibility can plausibly be defined in terms of other normative concepts. The latter issue concerns how ascriptions of vicarious responsibility can be justified. We will address these two pr…
Vicarious liability
Correctness and Completeness of Programming Instructions for Traffic Circulation
Rethinking Role Realism
Role realism is a promising realist theory of fictional names. Different versions of this theory have been suggested by Gregory Currie, Peter Lamarque, Stein Haugom Olsen, and Nicholas Wolterstorff. The general idea behind the approach is that fictional characters are to be analysed in terms of roles, which in turn can be understood as sets of properties (or alternatively as kinds or functions from possible worlds to individuals). I will discuss …
No prominent works on this page.
Rethinking Role Realism
Role realism is a promising realist theory of fictional names. Different versions of this theory have been suggested by Gregory Currie, Peter Lamarque, Stein Haugom Olsen, and Nicholas Wolterstorff. The general idea behind the approach is that fictional characters are to be analysed in terms of roles, which in turn can be understood as sets of properties (or alternatively as kinds or functions from possible worlds to individuals). I will discuss …
Correctness and Completeness of Programming Instructions for Traffic Circulation
Vicarious liability
Making Sense of Vicarious Responsibility
Vicarious responsibility is a notoriously puzzling notion in normative reasoning. In this article we will explore two fundamental issues, which we will call the “explication problem” and the “justification problem”. The former issue concerns how vicarious responsibility can plausibly be defined in terms of other normative concepts. The latter issue concerns how ascriptions of vicarious responsibility can be justified. We will address these two pr…
Meeting the AI achievement challenge
The present paper tackles what we might call the AI achievement challenge , which has been the subject of recent debate in AI ethics. The challenge concerns the question of whether there are any achievement gaps due to artificial intelligence and what we should do if there are: how to fill them, or what policies are needed to decrease their impact on us if they cannot be filled. This paper argues that none of the proposed views is entirely satisf…
The hyperintensionality of art
Daniel Nolan successfully predicted a hyperintensional revolution in metaphysics in his 2014 paper ‘Hyperintensional Metaphysicsʼ. He argued that hyperintensionality is not restricted to representations. However, it seems that one of the most promising candidates for non-representational hyperintensionality has not yet been considered as such: art. We will argue that art can provide a rather strong case for non-representational hyperintensionalit…
Responsible artificial intelligence
Although the phrase “responsible AI” is widely used in the AI industry, its meaning remains unclear. One can make sense of it indirectly, insofar as various notions of responsibility unproblematically attach to those involved in the creation and operation of AI technologies. It is less clear, however, whether the phrase makes sense when understood directly, that is, as the ascription of some sort of responsibility to AI systems themselves. This p…
Epistemology (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Free Will and Agency (2 works) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Artificial Intelligence (1 works) · Ascription (1 works)