Daniele Bruno Garancini
Biographic Data
| ID | 5995781 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Daniele Bruno Garancini |
| GIVEN NAMES | Daniele Bruno |
| FAMILY NAME | Garancini |
| SIGNATURE | GARANCINI D B |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Salzburg |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-6023-9361 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Should New Regulations be Imposed on Academic Publishing
This article argues, using a case study on Elsevier's business, that despite its many merits, the Open Science Movement has not succeeded in lowering the margins of for-profit academic publishing. Accordingly, regulations other than the ones suggested by the movement should be introduced to regulate this business. In conclusion, some reasons in favour of one proposal are briefly reviewed
Experiment-driven rationalism
Philosophers debate about which logical system, if any, is the One True Logic. This involves a disagreement concerning the sufficient conditions that may single out the correct logic among various candidates. This paper discusses whether there are necessary conditions for the correct logic; that is, I discuss whether there are features such that if a logic is correct, then it has those features, although having them might not be sufficient to sin…
No prominent works on this page.
Experiment-driven rationalism
Philosophers debate about which logical system, if any, is the One True Logic. This involves a disagreement concerning the sufficient conditions that may single out the correct logic among various candidates. This paper discusses whether there are necessary conditions for the correct logic; that is, I discuss whether there are features such that if a logic is correct, then it has those features, although having them might not be sufficient to sin…
Should New Regulations be Imposed on Academic Publishing
This article argues, using a case study on Elsevier's business, that despite its many merits, the Open Science Movement has not succeeded in lowering the margins of for-profit academic publishing. Accordingly, regulations other than the ones suggested by the movement should be introduced to regulate this business. In conclusion, some reasons in favour of one proposal are briefly reviewed
Academic Publishing and Open Access (1 work) · Child and Animal Learning Development (1 work) · Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (1 work) · Epistemology (1 work) · Metaphysics (1 work) · Movement (music) (1 work) · Philosophy (1 work) · Philosophy and History of Science (1 work) · Philosophy of language (1 work) · Philosophy of science (1 work)