Alejandro Fábregas-Tejeda
Biographic Data
| ID | 5995845 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Alejandro Fábregas-Tejeda |
| GIVEN NAMES | Alejandro |
| FAMILY NAME | Fábregas-Tejeda |
| SIGNATURE | FÁBREGAS-TEJEDA A |
| AFFILIATIONS | Institute of Philosophy |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-1797-5467 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Modeling versatility as the hallmark of model organisms
In recent years, discussions on the epistemology of model organism-based research have emerged in the philosophy of science. A key topic of discussion is how the epistemic insights gained from model organisms differ from those gained through other experimental organisms used in laboratory and field research. Here, we argue that model organisms are epistemically special due to their nature as ontogenetically changeable, standardized, and evolved m…
On the prospects of basal cognition research becoming fully evolutionary
The research programme 'basal cognition' adopts an evolutionary perspective for studying biological cognition. This entails investigating possible cognitive processes in 'simple'-often non-neuronal-organisms as a means to discover conserved mechanisms and adaptive capacities underwriting cognition in more complex (neuronal) organisms. However, by pulling in the opposite direction of a tradition that views cognition as something that is unique to …
Representing with model organisms
In this article, we mobilize and refine the DEKI account of scientific representation to contend that model organisms are not models tout court but model ‘carriers,’ only abstracted and selected ‘parts’ of which are included in biological models. These parts correspond to phenomena of interest that are interpreted as mechanisms or other kinds of causal processes within certain theoretical domains. The models can then be used to represent similar …
Two ontogenetic challenges to trait individuation
Driftability and niche construction
Niche construction is the process of organisms changing themselves or their environment—or their relationship with their environment—in ways that affect the evolutionary trajectory of their population. These evolutionary trajectory changes are traditionally understood to be triggered by changes in selection pressures. Niche construction thus necessarily involves organisms altering selection pressures. In this paper, we argue that changes in selec…
On the prospects of basal cognition research becoming fully evolutionary
The research programme 'basal cognition' adopts an evolutionary perspective for studying biological cognition. This entails investigating possible cognitive processes in 'simple'-often non-neuronal-organisms as a means to discover conserved mechanisms and adaptive capacities underwriting cognition in more complex (neuronal) organisms. However, by pulling in the opposite direction of a tradition that views cognition as something that is unique to …
Driftability and niche construction
Niche construction is the process of organisms changing themselves or their environment—or their relationship with their environment—in ways that affect the evolutionary trajectory of their population. These evolutionary trajectory changes are traditionally understood to be triggered by changes in selection pressures. Niche construction thus necessarily involves organisms altering selection pressures. In this paper, we argue that changes in selec…
On the prospects of basal cognition research becoming fully evolutionary
The research programme 'basal cognition' adopts an evolutionary perspective for studying biological cognition. This entails investigating possible cognitive processes in 'simple'-often non-neuronal-organisms as a means to discover conserved mechanisms and adaptive capacities underwriting cognition in more complex (neuronal) organisms. However, by pulling in the opposite direction of a tradition that views cognition as something that is unique to …
Representing with model organisms
In this article, we mobilize and refine the DEKI account of scientific representation to contend that model organisms are not models tout court but model ‘carriers,’ only abstracted and selected ‘parts’ of which are included in biological models. These parts correspond to phenomena of interest that are interpreted as mechanisms or other kinds of causal processes within certain theoretical domains. The models can then be used to represent similar …
Two ontogenetic challenges to trait individuation
Modeling versatility as the hallmark of model organisms
In recent years, discussions on the epistemology of model organism-based research have emerged in the philosophy of science. A key topic of discussion is how the epistemic insights gained from model organisms differ from those gained through other experimental organisms used in laboratory and field research. Here, we argue that model organisms are epistemically special due to their nature as ontogenetically changeable, standardized, and evolved m…
Biology (3 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Philosophy of science (3 works) · Artificial Intelligence (2 works) · Cognitive science (2 works) · Ecology (2 works) · Ecology (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (2 works) · Evolutionary biology (2 works)