Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jonathan Dixon

Biographic Data

ID5996460
NAMEJonathan Dixon
GIVEN NAMESJonathan
FAMILY NAMEDixon
SIGNATUREDIXON J
AFFILIATIONSWake Forest University
ORCID0000-0003-4040-7289
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS7
TOTAL CITATIONS2
AUTHOR COUNT7
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2014
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX1
  • X-Phi within its proper bounds

    Open Access•Jonathan Dixon•ARTICLE•Philosophical Psychology•2025

    Using two decades worth of experimental philosophy (aka x-phi), Edouard Machery argues in Philosophy within its Proper Bounds (2017) that philosophers’ use of the “method of cases” is unreliable because it has a strong tendency to elicit different intuitive responses from non-philosophers. And because, as Machery argues, appealing to such cases is usually the only way for philosophers to acquire the kind of knowledge they seek, an extensive philo…

  • No hope for conciliationism

    Open Access•Jonathan Dixon•ARTICLE•Synthese•2024•References: 72

    Conciliationism is the family of views that rationality requires agents to reduce confidence or suspend belief in p when acknowledged epistemic peers (i.e. agents who are (approximately) equally well-informed and intellectually capable) disagree about p. While Conciliationism is prima facie plausible, some have argued that Conciliationism is not an adequate theory of peer disagreement because it is self-undermining. Responses to this challenge ca…

  • The insignificance of philosophical skepticism

    Open Access•Jonathan Dixon•ARTICLE•Synthese•2022•References: 34

  • Moral disagreement scepticism leveled

    Open Access•Jonathan Dixon•ARTICLE•Ratio•2021

    While many have argued that moral disagreement poses a challenge to moral knowledge, the precise nature of this challenge is controversial. Indeed, in the moral epistemology literature, there are many different versions of ‘the’ argument from moral disagreement to moral scepticism. This paper contributes to this vast literature on moral disagreement by arguing for two theses: 1. All (or nearly all) moral disagreement arguments share an underlying…

  • Reliable Knowledge

    Open Access•Jonathan Dixon•ARTICLE•dialectica•2020

    Recently John Turri (2015b) has argued, contra the orthodoxy amongst epistemologists, that reliability is not a necessary condition for knowledge. From this result, Turri (2015a, 2017, 2016a, 2019) defends a new account of knowledge — called abilism — that allows for unreliable knowledge. I argue that Turri’s arguments fail to establish that unreliable knowledge is possible and argue that Turri’s account of knowledge is false because reliability …

  • From “Pearls” to “Arrows”

    Jonathan Dixon•ARTICLE•Comparative Strategy•2014•Cited by: 1

    Over the past decade, much has been made of the People's Republic of China's (PRC) growing maritime ambitions, both within its territorial waters and in neighboring oceans. However, as foreign analysts grapple with how to translate China's somewhat conflicting strategies into a unified strategy, they often are unable to find guidance from the government itself. As a result, the current metaphors that are used to describe China's naval strategies …

  • East China Sea or South China Sea, they are all China's Seas

    Open Access•Jonathan Dixon•ARTICLE•Nationalities Papers•2014•Cited by: 1•References: 20

    Much has been made over the past few years of China'vs ambitions of regaining control of its irredentist claims in the East and South China Seas. While some of this speculation focuses on the massive amounts of money the People's Republic of China (PRC) has funneled into its naval modernization program, other analysts are more interested in the drivers behind the increasingly popular sentiment that the country must “reclaim” its lost territories.…

  • From “Pearls” to “Arrows”

    Jonathan Dixon•ARTICLE•Comparative Strategy•2014•Cited by: 1

    Over the past decade, much has been made of the People's Republic of China's (PRC) growing maritime ambitions, both within its territorial waters and in neighboring oceans. However, as foreign analysts grapple with how to translate China's somewhat conflicting strategies into a unified strategy, they often are unable to find guidance from the government itself. As a result, the current metaphors that are used to describe China's naval strategies …

  • East China Sea or South China Sea, they are all China's Seas

    Open Access•Jonathan Dixon•ARTICLE•Nationalities Papers•2014•Cited by: 1•References: 20

    Much has been made over the past few years of China'vs ambitions of regaining control of its irredentist claims in the East and South China Seas. While some of this speculation focuses on the massive amounts of money the People's Republic of China (PRC) has funneled into its naval modernization program, other analysts are more interested in the drivers behind the increasingly popular sentiment that the country must “reclaim” its lost territories.…

  • From “Pearls” to “Arrows”

    Jonathan Dixon•ARTICLE•Comparative Strategy•2014•Cited by: 1

    Over the past decade, much has been made of the People's Republic of China's (PRC) growing maritime ambitions, both within its territorial waters and in neighboring oceans. However, as foreign analysts grapple with how to translate China's somewhat conflicting strategies into a unified strategy, they often are unable to find guidance from the government itself. As a result, the current metaphors that are used to describe China's naval strategies …

  • East China Sea or South China Sea, they are all China's Seas

    Open Access•Jonathan Dixon•ARTICLE•Nationalities Papers•2014•Cited by: 1•References: 20

    Much has been made over the past few years of China'vs ambitions of regaining control of its irredentist claims in the East and South China Seas. While some of this speculation focuses on the massive amounts of money the People's Republic of China (PRC) has funneled into its naval modernization program, other analysts are more interested in the drivers behind the increasingly popular sentiment that the country must “reclaim” its lost territories.…

  • Reliable Knowledge

    Open Access•Jonathan Dixon•ARTICLE•dialectica•2020

    Recently John Turri (2015b) has argued, contra the orthodoxy amongst epistemologists, that reliability is not a necessary condition for knowledge. From this result, Turri (2015a, 2017, 2016a, 2019) defends a new account of knowledge — called abilism — that allows for unreliable knowledge. I argue that Turri’s arguments fail to establish that unreliable knowledge is possible and argue that Turri’s account of knowledge is false because reliability …

  • Moral disagreement scepticism leveled

    Open Access•Jonathan Dixon•ARTICLE•Ratio•2021

    While many have argued that moral disagreement poses a challenge to moral knowledge, the precise nature of this challenge is controversial. Indeed, in the moral epistemology literature, there are many different versions of ‘the’ argument from moral disagreement to moral scepticism. This paper contributes to this vast literature on moral disagreement by arguing for two theses: 1. All (or nearly all) moral disagreement arguments share an underlying…

  • The insignificance of philosophical skepticism

    Open Access•Jonathan Dixon•ARTICLE•Synthese•2022•References: 34

  • No hope for conciliationism

    Open Access•Jonathan Dixon•ARTICLE•Synthese•2024•References: 72

    Conciliationism is the family of views that rationality requires agents to reduce confidence or suspend belief in p when acknowledged epistemic peers (i.e. agents who are (approximately) equally well-informed and intellectually capable) disagree about p. While Conciliationism is prima facie plausible, some have argued that Conciliationism is not an adequate theory of peer disagreement because it is self-undermining. Responses to this challenge ca…

  • X-Phi within its proper bounds

    Open Access•Jonathan Dixon•ARTICLE•Philosophical Psychology•2025

    Using two decades worth of experimental philosophy (aka x-phi), Edouard Machery argues in Philosophy within its Proper Bounds (2017) that philosophers’ use of the “method of cases” is unreliable because it has a strong tendency to elicit different intuitive responses from non-philosophers. And because, as Machery argues, appealing to such cases is usually the only way for philosophers to acquire the kind of knowledge they seek, an extensive philo…

Philosophy (6 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 works) · Economics (3 works) · Free Will and Agency (3 works) · Metaphysics (3 works) · Skepticism (3 works) · Argument (complex analysis) (2 works) · China (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae