Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Carlo Proietti

Biographic Data

ID5996625
NAMECarlo Proietti
GIVEN NAMESCarlo
FAMILY NAMEProietti
SIGNATUREPROIETTI C
AFFILIATIONSLund University
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS2
WORKS AS AUTHOR4
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2010
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX1
  • The Role of Argument Strength and Informational Biases in Polarization and Bi-Polarization Effects

    Open Access•Carlo Proietti, Davide Chiarella•ARTICLE•Journal of Artificial Societies…•2023

    This work explores, on a simulative basis, the informational causes of polarization and bi-polarization of opinions in groups. Here, the term 'polarization' refers to a uniform change of the opinion of the whole group towards the same direction, whereas 'bi-polarization' indicates a split of two subgroups towards opposite directions. For the purposes of the present inquiry we expand the model of the Argument Communication Theory of Bi-polarizatio…

  • Dynamic epistemic logics for abstract argumentation

    Open Access•Carlo Proietti, Antonio Yuste-Ginel•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•References: 61

    This paper introduces a multi-agent dynamic epistemic logic for abstract argumentation. Its main motivation is to build a general framework for modelling the dynamics of a debate, which entails reasoning about goals, beliefs, as well as policies of communication and information update by the participants. After locating our proposal and introducing the relevant tools from abstract argumentation, we proceed to build a three-tiered logical approach…

  • Social Norms and the Dominance of Low-Doers

    Open Access•Carlo Proietti, Antonio Franco Crespo et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Artificial Societies…•2018

    Social norms play a fundamental role in holding groups together. The rationale behind most of them is to coordinate individual actions into a beneficial societal outcome. However, there are cases where prosocial behavior within a community seems, to the contrary, to cause ine iciencies and suboptimal collective outcomes. An explanation for this is that individuals in a society are of di erent types and their type determines the norm of fairness t…

  • Fitch’s paradox and ceteris paribus modalities

    Open Access•Carlo Proietti, Gabriel Sandu•ARTICLE•Synthese•2010•Cited by: 2•References: 10

  • Fitch’s paradox and ceteris paribus modalities

    Open Access•Carlo Proietti, Gabriel Sandu•ARTICLE•Synthese•2010•Cited by: 2•References: 10

  • Fitch’s paradox and ceteris paribus modalities

    Open Access•Carlo Proietti, Gabriel Sandu•ARTICLE•Synthese•2010•Cited by: 2•References: 10

  • Social Norms and the Dominance of Low-Doers

    Open Access•Carlo Proietti, Antonio Franco Crespo et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Artificial Societies…•2018

    Social norms play a fundamental role in holding groups together. The rationale behind most of them is to coordinate individual actions into a beneficial societal outcome. However, there are cases where prosocial behavior within a community seems, to the contrary, to cause ine iciencies and suboptimal collective outcomes. An explanation for this is that individuals in a society are of di erent types and their type determines the norm of fairness t…

  • Dynamic epistemic logics for abstract argumentation

    Open Access•Carlo Proietti, Antonio Yuste-Ginel•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•References: 61

    This paper introduces a multi-agent dynamic epistemic logic for abstract argumentation. Its main motivation is to build a general framework for modelling the dynamics of a debate, which entails reasoning about goals, beliefs, as well as policies of communication and information update by the participants. After locating our proposal and introducing the relevant tools from abstract argumentation, we proceed to build a three-tiered logical approach…

  • The Role of Argument Strength and Informational Biases in Polarization and Bi-Polarization Effects

    Open Access•Carlo Proietti, Davide Chiarella•ARTICLE•Journal of Artificial Societies…•2023

    This work explores, on a simulative basis, the informational causes of polarization and bi-polarization of opinions in groups. Here, the term 'polarization' refers to a uniform change of the opinion of the whole group towards the same direction, whereas 'bi-polarization' indicates a split of two subgroups towards opposite directions. For the purposes of the present inquiry we expand the model of the Argument Communication Theory of Bi-polarizatio…

Artificial Intelligence (2 works) · Artificial Intelligence (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 works) · Mathematics (2 works) · Metaphysics (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Philosophy of language (2 works) · Philosophy of science (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae