Conal Duddy
Biographic Data
| ID | 5997489 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Conal Duddy |
| GIVEN NAMES | Conal |
| FAMILY NAME | Duddy |
| SIGNATURE | DUDDY C |
| AFFILIATIONS | Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7801-9305 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2013 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Geometry of run-off elections
Fair sharing under dichotomous preferences
In an important article on collective choice with dichotomous preferences, Bogomolnaia et al. (2005) propose a fairness criterion called fair welfare share. We argue that this criterion permits mechanisms that are not fair and we propose an alternative fairness concept called proportional sharing. It guarantees to each subgroup, such as a social class, gender or ethnic group, a fair probability that at least one of its members will like the final…
Reconciling probability theory and coherentism
Recent results in the literature appear to show that it is impossible for two independent testimonies to jointly raise the probability of a proposition if neither testimony individually has any impact on that probability. I show that these impossibility results do not apply when testimonies agree on incidental details
Collective approval
Collective approval
Reconciling probability theory and coherentism
Recent results in the literature appear to show that it is impossible for two independent testimonies to jointly raise the probability of a proposition if neither testimony individually has any impact on that probability. I show that these impossibility results do not apply when testimonies agree on incidental details
Fair sharing under dichotomous preferences
In an important article on collective choice with dichotomous preferences, Bogomolnaia et al. (2005) propose a fairness criterion called fair welfare share. We argue that this criterion permits mechanisms that are not fair and we propose an alternative fairness concept called proportional sharing. It guarantees to each subgroup, such as a social class, gender or ethnic group, a fair probability that at least one of its members will like the final…
Geometry of run-off elections
Mathematical economics (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Economics (3 works) · Game Theory and Voting Systems (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Law (2 works) · Mathematics (2 works) · Agnosticism (1 work) · Anonymity (1 work) · Anti-plurality voting (1 work)