Anne Marel Hilbers
Biographic Data
| ID | 6002874 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Anne Marel Hilbers |
| GIVEN NAMES | Anne Marel |
| FAMILY NAME | Hilbers |
| SIGNATURE | HILBERS A M |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Groningen |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-9437-7145 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 5 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Limits to participation in road infrastructure planning
There is only a finite amount of land, which is why the decision to allow a particular land use often results in a trade-off with other potential land uses. Traditionally, trade-offs have been assumed by planning professionals (i.e. ‘experts by profession’), while citizens, who experience the landscape on a daily basis (i.e. ‘experts by experience’), are only involved to a limited extent. Several researchers suggested that assessment and mapping …
Size matters! Using conjoint analysis to uncover public preferences for design optimisation in road infrastructure EIAs
The planning and realisation of road infrastructure projects is often societally controversial because of the impacts and the difficult trade-offs between alternative project designs. Neither in current literature nor in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) practice do we find any clear method to engage the public in integral trade-off choices. This paper aims to uncover public preferences about integrated road infrastructure projects, not by fo…
Identifying Citizens' Place Values for Integrated Planning of Road Infrastructure Projects
Projects for road infrastructure and spatial development easily meet public resistance because of a lack of local knowledge of place values by (often non‐local) planners. The aim of this study is to explore how insights in place values might improve the local knowledge base for planners of integrated road infrastructure projects and spatial development. We developed, tested and analysed the results from a novel online value‐mapping tool called th…
Size matters! Using conjoint analysis to uncover public preferences for design optimisation in road infrastructure EIAs
The planning and realisation of road infrastructure projects is often societally controversial because of the impacts and the difficult trade-offs between alternative project designs. Neither in current literature nor in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) practice do we find any clear method to engage the public in integral trade-off choices. This paper aims to uncover public preferences about integrated road infrastructure projects, not by fo…
Identifying Citizens' Place Values for Integrated Planning of Road Infrastructure Projects
Projects for road infrastructure and spatial development easily meet public resistance because of a lack of local knowledge of place values by (often non‐local) planners. The aim of this study is to explore how insights in place values might improve the local knowledge base for planners of integrated road infrastructure projects and spatial development. We developed, tested and analysed the results from a novel online value‐mapping tool called th…
Identifying Citizens' Place Values for Integrated Planning of Road Infrastructure Projects
Projects for road infrastructure and spatial development easily meet public resistance because of a lack of local knowledge of place values by (often non‐local) planners. The aim of this study is to explore how insights in place values might improve the local knowledge base for planners of integrated road infrastructure projects and spatial development. We developed, tested and analysed the results from a novel online value‐mapping tool called th…
Limits to participation in road infrastructure planning
There is only a finite amount of land, which is why the decision to allow a particular land use often results in a trade-off with other potential land uses. Traditionally, trade-offs have been assumed by planning professionals (i.e. ‘experts by profession’), while citizens, who experience the landscape on a daily basis (i.e. ‘experts by experience’), are only involved to a limited extent. Several researchers suggested that assessment and mapping …
Size matters! Using conjoint analysis to uncover public preferences for design optimisation in road infrastructure EIAs
The planning and realisation of road infrastructure projects is often societally controversial because of the impacts and the difficult trade-offs between alternative project designs. Neither in current literature nor in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) practice do we find any clear method to engage the public in integral trade-off choices. This paper aims to uncover public preferences about integrated road infrastructure projects, not by fo…
Business (3 works) · Environmental planning (3 works) · Geography (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 works) · Economics (2 works) · Environmental resource management (2 works) · Microeconomics (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Preference (2 works)