Ravi Amarnath
Biographic Data
| ID | 6005928 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Ravi Amarnath |
| GIVEN NAMES | Ravi |
| FAMILY NAME | Amarnath |
| SIGNATURE | AMARNATH R |
| AFFILIATIONS | Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Understanding Dialogue Theory
This chapter discusses Charter dialogue theory, tracing its evolution within the academic literature, as well as how it has been interpreted by Canadian courts. The authors define the concept of Charter dialogue, or legislative responses to decisions of Canadian courts involving fundamental human rights and freedoms. They describe the features of the Canadian Charter which make the process of Charter dialogue possible, as well as its limitations.…
Why judges should dissent
This article discusses why judges at intermediate appellate courts should dissent when they are in disagreement with their colleagues as to either the outcome of a case or the reasons given to reach a particular decision. The authors argue that dissenting judgments promote individual judicial responsibility and demonstrate transparency as to how a decision was reached by a panel of judges. They also describe how dissenting judgments have the abil…
No prominent works on this page.
Understanding Dialogue Theory
This chapter discusses Charter dialogue theory, tracing its evolution within the academic literature, as well as how it has been interpreted by Canadian courts. The authors define the concept of Charter dialogue, or legislative responses to decisions of Canadian courts involving fundamental human rights and freedoms. They describe the features of the Canadian Charter which make the process of Charter dialogue possible, as well as its limitations.…
Why judges should dissent
This article discusses why judges at intermediate appellate courts should dissent when they are in disagreement with their colleagues as to either the outcome of a case or the reasons given to reach a particular decision. The authors argue that dissenting judgments promote individual judicial responsibility and demonstrate transparency as to how a decision was reached by a panel of judges. They also describe how dissenting judgments have the abil…
Epistemology (2 works) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law and economics (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Charter (1 work) · Comparative and International Law Studies (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Dissent (1 work)