Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Manfred Krifka

Biographic Data

ID600893
NAMEManfred Krifka
GIVEN NAMESManfred
FAMILY NAMEKrifka
SIGNATUREKRIFKA M
AFFILIATIONSHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin
ORCID0000-0002-9610-8352
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS41
TOTAL CITATIONS300
AUTHOR COUNT39
EDITOR COUNT2
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1985
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX5
  • The Persian Tense-Aspect System: The Interplay Between Perfective Stem and Durative Prefix

    Open Access•Fereshteh Modarresi, Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Languages•2026

    The core of the Persian tense-aspect system revolves around two verbal stem forms and the so-called durative prefix mi-. We argue that Stem II encodes a perfective meaning, requiring that the event time is contained in the topic time, whereas the prefix mi- encodes that a viewpoint is temporally contained in the event time. Temporal operators, in turn, relate the viewpoint time and the topic time to the utterance time, thus relating the event tim…

  • Managing the reputation of trustworthiness in face-to-face communication

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Frontiers in Communication•2026

    One prominent account of the speech act of assertion assumes that by asserting a proposition, the speaker commits to the proposition, that is, vouches for its truth. This predicts negative social effects on the reputation of the speaker, in particular, trustworthiness, or credibility, if the proposition turns out to be false (and conversely, positive effects if it is true). In this paper, I will show that there are modifications to assertive comm…

  • Self-talk and syntactic structure

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Theoretical Linguistics•2025

    This commentary addresses syntactic aspects of self-talk, as well as the relevance of literary sources and theories of the self

  • Performative updates and the modeling of speech acts

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Synthese•2024•Cited by: 2•References: 66

    This paper develops a way to model performative speech acts within a framework of dynamic semantics. It introduces a distinction between performative and informative updates, where informative updates filter out indices of context sets (cf. Stalnaker, Cole (ed), Pragmatics, Academic Press, 1978), whereas performative updates change their indices (cf. Szabolcsi, Kiefer (ed), Hungarian linguistics, John Benjamins, 1982). The notion of index change …

  • Structure and interpretation of declarative sentences

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Journal of Pragmatics•2024•Cited by: 4•References: 29

    Declarative sentences are known to be compatible with a wide range of different speech acts. The paper develops, for German, a proposal in which declarative sentences that express assertions, declarations (including explicit performatives), exclamations, wishes, commands, observations (or miratives), reminders and questions have slightly distinct syntactic representations and, consequently, semantic interpretations. The syntactic representation a…

  • Certainly but not certain: The expression of subjective and objective probability

    Open Access•Kazuko Yatsushiro, Tue Trinh et al.•ARTICLE•Glossa a journal of general…•2022

    This paper investigates the interpretation of the epistemic modal adjectives possible, certain and their adverbial counterparts possibly, certainly, taking the perspective that the former express objective modality, whereas the latter express subjective modality. In support of this view, we report on two experiments that assess speakers’ acceptance of possible, certain, possibly, certainly in different contexts. Our results extend those of Lassit…

  • A note on the gifted mathematician that you claim to be

    Open Access•Alexander Grosu, Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Linguistics and Philosophy•2022

  • Irrealis is real: Supplementary Material

    Kilu Von Prince, Ana Krajinović et al.•ARTICLE•Language•2022

  • Irrealis is real

    Open Access•Kilu Von Prince, Ana Krajinović et al.•ARTICLE•Language•2022•Cited by: 3

    The question of whether Irrealis is a meaningful concept in crosslinguistic comparison has been the subject of long-standing controversy. In this article, we argue that the semantic domain of irreality is split into two domains—the possible and the counterfactual—and that an ‘irrealis’ marker in a given language may refer either to only one of these domains or to both. A significant part of the crosslinguistic variation in what is referred to by …

  • Pseudo Incorporation and Anaphoricity: Evidence from Persian

    Open Access•Fereshteh Modarresi, Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Glossa a journal of general…•2021

    The paper investigates the discourse effects of bare nominal pseudo-incorporated objects in Persian. Contrary to claims that such nominals cannot be antecedents to anaphora, experimental results show that that their anaphoric potential is only somewhat reduced, compared to indefinites. This is consonant with Krifka & Modarresi (2016), according to which they are interpreted like functional definites that are dependent on the event denoted by the …

  • Focus and contrastive topic in questions and answers, with particular reference to Turkish

    Beste Kamali, Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Theoretical Linguistics•2020

    Much recent research has recognized the importance of focus and contrastive topic in assertions for discourse coherence. However, with few exceptions, it has been neglected that focus and contrastive topic also occur in questions, and have a similar role in establishing coherence. We propose a framework of dynamic interpretation based on the notion of Commitment Spaces that show that a uniform interpretation of focus and contrastive topic is poss…

  • Focus and contrastive topic: More questions, and answers

    Beste Kamali, Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Theoretical Linguistics•2020

    Kamali B, Krifka M. Focus and contrastive topic: More questions, and answers. Theoretical Linguistics . 2020;46(1-2):141-157

  • Antonym adjective pairs and prosodic iconicity: Evidence from letter replications in an English blogger corpus

    Fuch, Egor Savin et al.•ARTICLE•Linguistics Vanguard•2019

    While the general assumption has long been that natural languages exhibit an arbitrary pairing of form and meaning, there is increasing empirical evidence that iconicity in language is not uncommon. One example from spoken language involves iconic prosodic modulation, i.e. the changing of prosodic features such as duration and fundamental frequency to express meanings such as size and speed. In this paper, we use data from an English social media…

  • Commitments and beyond

    Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Theoretical Linguistics•2019

    This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively

  • Grammatiktheorie und Empirie in der germanistischen Linguistik

    Open Access•Angelika Wöllstein, Peter Gallmann et al.•BOOK•Grammatiktheorie und Empirie in…•2018

  • Puzzling response particles: An experimental study on the German answering system

    Open Access•Berry Claus, A Marlijn Meijer et al.•ARTICLE•Semantics and Pragmatics•2017

    This paper addresses the use and interpretation of the German response particles ja, nein, and doch. In four experiments, we collected acceptability-judgement data for the full paradigm of standard German particles in responses to positive and negative assertions. The experiments were designed to test the empirical validity of two recent accounts of response particles, Roelofsen & Farkas (2015) and Krifka (2013), which view response particles as …

  • On the interplay of object animacy and verb type during sentence comprehension in German: ERP evidence from the processing of transitive dative and accusative constructions

    Open Access•Anna Czypionka, Krzysztof Spałek et al.•ARTICLE•Linguistics•2017•References: 38

    Comprehension of transitive sentences relies on different kinds of information, like word order, case marking, and animacy contrasts between arguments. When no formal cues like case marking or number congruency are available, a contrast in animacy helps the parser to decide which argument is the grammatical subject and which the object. Processing costs are enhanced when neither formal cues nor animacy contrasts are available in a transitive sent…

  • Bias in commitment space semantics: Declarative questions, negated quetions, and question tags

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Proceedings from Semantics and…•2015

    The paper introduces a formal framework for communication that captures not only information that is agreed upon by the interlocutors, but also the possible legal continuations of the communicative exchange. It allows for modeling conjunction, disjunction and denegation of speech acts. Assertions are analyzed as commitments of interlocutors for the truth of propositions. Questions are conversational moves that restrict the legal continuations to …

  • Response particles as propositional anaphors

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Proceedings from Semantics and…•2015

    The paper explains response particles like yes and no as anaphoric elements that pick up propositional discourse referents that are introduced by preceding sentences. It is argued that negated antecedent clauses introduce two propositional discourse referents, which results in ambiguities of answers that is partly resolved by pragmatic optimization. The paper also discusses response particles like okay, right and uh-huh and uh-uh, and German ja, …

  • Some remarks on event structure, conceptual spaces and the semantics of verbs

    Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Theoretical Linguistics•2012

    The target paper by Massimo Warglien, Peter Gardenfors and Matthijs Westera (henceforward, WGW) sketches a promising approach to what is perhaps the greatest lacuna in linguistic semantics. On the one hand, the Frege/Montague research program, based on the idea that truth-conditions are the core ingredient of clause meaning and that meanings of complex expressions are computed from the meanings of the parts, has been extremely successful. On the …

  • In defense of idealizations: A commentary on Stokhof and van Lambalgen

    Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Theoretical Linguistics•2011

  • How to Interpret “Expletive” Negation under bevor in German

    Manfred Krifka•CHAPTER•Language and Logos•2010

    There are other well-known examples of non-interpreted negation, viz. cases of so-called negative concord in Slavic and Romance languages, but also in dialects of German and English. But arguably, in those cases the “superfluous” negation has to be present for grammatical reasons, which is not the case here. I will show that the negation is in fact interpreted, and that, due to a complex interplay of semantic and pragmatic factors, we do get trut…

  • Before and After without coercion: Comment on the paper by Cleo Condoravdi

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2010

  • On Inflection

    Patrick O Steinkrüger, Manfred Krifka•BOOK•On Inflection•2009

  • Basic notions of information structure

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Acta Linguistica Hungarica•2008•Cited by: 179•References: 16

    This article takes stock of the basic notions of Information Structure (IS).It first provides a general characterization of IS -following Chafe (1976) -within a communicative model of Common Ground (CG), which distinguishes between CG content and CG management.IS is concerned with those features of language that affect the local CG.Second, this paper defines and discusses the notions of Focus (as indicating alternatives) and its various uses, Giv…

Next
  • Basic notions of information structure

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Acta Linguistica Hungarica•2008•Cited by: 179•References: 16

    This article takes stock of the basic notions of Information Structure (IS).It first provides a general characterization of IS -following Chafe (1976) -within a communicative model of Common Ground (CG), which distinguishes between CG content and CG management.IS is concerned with those features of language that affect the local CG.Second, this paper defines and discusses the notions of Focus (as indicating alternatives) and its various uses, Giv…

  • The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective

    Manfred Krifka, Eberhard König et al.•ARTICLE•Language•1993•Cited by: 37•References: 10

    The Meaning of Focus ParticlesFocus particles (even, only, also, merely) play an important role in English in various syntactic and semantic domains such as coordination, focusing, emphatic reflexives, concessive constructions, and quantification.The syntactic properties of these expressions pose numerous problems for current syntactic frameworks and the highly context-dependent and subjective nature of their meaning presents a challenge for sema…

  • Quantifying into Question Acts

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Natural Language Semantics•2001•Cited by: 32•References: 22

  • Scope Inversion under the Rise-Fall Contour in German

    Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•1998•Cited by: 31•References: 12

    A well-known but ill-explained fact about German is scope inversion under a rise-fall accent contour. The scope inversion in this reading can be derived from general principles of scope assignment and focus marking in German. In particular, focus is assigned to preverbal constituents, leading to syntactic configurations that result in ambiguous interpretations. This explanation must be couched in a framework of derivational economy that favors sh…

  • Bare NPs: Kind-referring, Indefinites, Both, or Neither

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Proceedings from Semantics and…•2003•Cited by: 10•References: 2

    No abstract

  • Structure and interpretation of declarative sentences

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Journal of Pragmatics•2024•Cited by: 4•References: 29

    Declarative sentences are known to be compatible with a wide range of different speech acts. The paper develops, for German, a proposal in which declarative sentences that express assertions, declarations (including explicit performatives), exclamations, wishes, commands, observations (or miratives), reminders and questions have slightly distinct syntactic representations and, consequently, semantic interpretations. The syntactic representation a…

  • Irrealis is real

    Open Access•Kilu Von Prince, Ana Krajinović et al.•ARTICLE•Language•2022•Cited by: 3

    The question of whether Irrealis is a meaningful concept in crosslinguistic comparison has been the subject of long-standing controversy. In this article, we argue that the semantic domain of irreality is split into two domains—the possible and the counterfactual—and that an ‘irrealis’ marker in a given language may refer either to only one of these domains or to both. A significant part of the crosslinguistic variation in what is referred to by …

  • Performative updates and the modeling of speech acts

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Synthese•2024•Cited by: 2•References: 66

    This paper develops a way to model performative speech acts within a framework of dynamic semantics. It introduces a distinction between performative and informative updates, where informative updates filter out indices of context sets (cf. Stalnaker, Cole (ed), Pragmatics, Academic Press, 1978), whereas performative updates change their indices (cf. Szabolcsi, Kiefer (ed), Hungarian linguistics, John Benjamins, 1982). The notion of index change …

  • Focus and secondary predication. Studies in Generative Grammar 43

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Journal of Pragmatics•1998•Cited by: 2•References: 12

  • Harmony or Consistency

    Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Theoretical Linguistics•1985

  • Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics

    Manfred Krifka•CHAPTER•Semantics and Contextual…•1989

    It is by now a weIl-known topic in semantics that there are striking similarities between the meanings of nominal and verbal expressions, insofar as the mass:count distinction in the nominal domain is reflected in the atelic:telic distinction in the verbal domain (cf. Leisi 1953, Taylor 1977, Bach 1986, to cite just a few authors). However, these supposed similarities have not be made explicit in formal representations.

  • Zur Renzension angeboten

    Open Access•Hrsg Von Bright, Te Endres-Niggemeyer et al.•ARTICLE•Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft•1990

  • Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution: Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen und Aspektklassen

    Open Access•Östen Dahl, Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Language•1991

  • Focus and Presupposition in Dynamic Interpretation

    Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Journal of Semantics•1993

    Structured meanings have evolved as a well-suited tool to describe the semantics of focus constructions (cf. von Stechow 1990; Jacobs 1991; Krifka 1992). In this paper, I will show how structured meanings can be combined with a framework of dynamic interpretation that allows for a cogent expression of anaphoric relations and presuppositions. I will concentrate in particular on the semantics of the focusing particle only and discuss several phenom…

  • Rezensionsteil

    Open Access•Michael Bamberg, Reinhard Fiehler et al.•ARTICLE•Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft•1993

  • Fragesätze und Fragen

    Manfred Krifka, Marga Reis et al.•ARTICLE•Language•1993

  • The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective

    Manfred Krifka, Eberhard König et al.•ARTICLE•Language•1993•Cited by: 37•References: 10

    The Meaning of Focus ParticlesFocus particles (even, only, also, merely) play an important role in English in various syntactic and semantic domains such as coordination, focusing, emphatic reflexives, concessive constructions, and quantification.The syntactic properties of these expressions pose numerous problems for current syntactic frameworks and the highly context-dependent and subjective nature of their meaning presents a challenge for sema…

  • Kasusrelationen und semantische Emphase

    Manfred Krifka, Jurgen Kunze•ARTICLE•Language•1994

  • The Origins of Telicity

    Manfred Krifka•CHAPTER•Events and Grammar•1998

  • Scope Inversion under the Rise-Fall Contour in German

    Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•1998•Cited by: 31•References: 12

    A well-known but ill-explained fact about German is scope inversion under a rise-fall accent contour. The scope inversion in this reading can be derived from general principles of scope assignment and focus marking in German. In particular, focus is assigned to preverbal constituents, leading to syntactic configurations that result in ambiguous interpretations. This explanation must be couched in a framework of derivational economy that favors sh…

  • Focus and secondary predication. Studies in Generative Grammar 43

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Journal of Pragmatics•1998•Cited by: 2•References: 12

  • Alternatives for Aspectual Particles: Semantics of still and already

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Proceedings of the Annual Meeting…•2000

    Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Aspect (2000)

  • Quantifying into Question Acts

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Natural Language Semantics•2001•Cited by: 32•References: 22

  • Bare NPs: Kind-referring, Indefinites, Both, or Neither

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Proceedings from Semantics and…•2003•Cited by: 10•References: 2

    No abstract

  • The Semantics of Questions and the Focusation of Answers

    Manfred Krifka•CHAPTER•Topic and Focus•2006

  • Basic notions of information structure

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Acta Linguistica Hungarica•2008•Cited by: 179•References: 16

    This article takes stock of the basic notions of Information Structure (IS).It first provides a general characterization of IS -following Chafe (1976) -within a communicative model of Common Ground (CG), which distinguishes between CG content and CG management.IS is concerned with those features of language that affect the local CG.Second, this paper defines and discusses the notions of Focus (as indicating alternatives) and its various uses, Giv…

  • On Inflection

    Patrick O Steinkrüger, Manfred Krifka•BOOK•On Inflection•2009

  • How to Interpret “Expletive” Negation under bevor in German

    Manfred Krifka•CHAPTER•Language and Logos•2010

    There are other well-known examples of non-interpreted negation, viz. cases of so-called negative concord in Slavic and Romance languages, but also in dialects of German and English. But arguably, in those cases the “superfluous” negation has to be present for grammatical reasons, which is not the case here. I will show that the negation is in fact interpreted, and that, due to a complex interplay of semantic and pragmatic factors, we do get trut…

  • Before and After without coercion: Comment on the paper by Cleo Condoravdi

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2010

  • In defense of idealizations: A commentary on Stokhof and van Lambalgen

    Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Theoretical Linguistics•2011

  • Some remarks on event structure, conceptual spaces and the semantics of verbs

    Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Theoretical Linguistics•2012

    The target paper by Massimo Warglien, Peter Gardenfors and Matthijs Westera (henceforward, WGW) sketches a promising approach to what is perhaps the greatest lacuna in linguistic semantics. On the one hand, the Frege/Montague research program, based on the idea that truth-conditions are the core ingredient of clause meaning and that meanings of complex expressions are computed from the meanings of the parts, has been extremely successful. On the …

  • Bias in commitment space semantics: Declarative questions, negated quetions, and question tags

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Proceedings from Semantics and…•2015

    The paper introduces a formal framework for communication that captures not only information that is agreed upon by the interlocutors, but also the possible legal continuations of the communicative exchange. It allows for modeling conjunction, disjunction and denegation of speech acts. Assertions are analyzed as commitments of interlocutors for the truth of propositions. Questions are conversational moves that restrict the legal continuations to …

  • Response particles as propositional anaphors

    Open Access•Manfred Krifka•ARTICLE•Proceedings from Semantics and…•2015

    The paper explains response particles like yes and no as anaphoric elements that pick up propositional discourse referents that are introduced by preceding sentences. It is argued that negated antecedent clauses introduce two propositional discourse referents, which results in ambiguities of answers that is partly resolved by pragmatic optimization. The paper also discusses response particles like okay, right and uh-huh and uh-uh, and German ja, …

  • Puzzling response particles: An experimental study on the German answering system

    Open Access•Berry Claus, A Marlijn Meijer et al.•ARTICLE•Semantics and Pragmatics•2017

    This paper addresses the use and interpretation of the German response particles ja, nein, and doch. In four experiments, we collected acceptability-judgement data for the full paradigm of standard German particles in responses to positive and negative assertions. The experiments were designed to test the empirical validity of two recent accounts of response particles, Roelofsen & Farkas (2015) and Krifka (2013), which view response particles as …

Computer Science (27 works) · Linguistics (24 works) · Philosophy (24 works) · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (24 works) · Psychology (17 works) · Natural Language Processing Techniques (12 works) · Epistemology (11 works) · Mathematics (8 works) · Programming language (8 works) · Natural language processing (7 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae