Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Miguel Á Cebrián-Piqueras

Biographic Data

ID6018439
NAMEMiguel Á Cebrián-Piqueras
GIVEN NAMESMiguel Á
FAMILY NAMECebrián-Piqueras
SIGNATURECEBRIÁN-PIQUERAS M Á
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Göttingen
ORCID0000-0002-2130-0921
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS16
TOTAL CITATIONS17
AUTHOR COUNT16
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX3
  • Multifaceted landscapes for grassland restoration: Exploring individual perceptions on grasslands through photovoice

    Open Access•Konrad Gray, Anita Kirmer et al.•ARTICLE•Ecosystems and People•2026

    Reconnecting humans and nature, along with reversing the trend of biodiversity loss, are among the most pressing challenges of our times. Grassland restoration offers a promising pathway to halt and reverse biodiversity decline. Since local people are central to maintaining biodiversity and equally benefit from nature, transdisciplinary and social-ecological approaches to restoration are key to achieving sustainable outcomes. These approaches go …

  • A multi-layered values-based approach to advance social-ecological restoration: Insights from real-world laboratories in Germany

    Open Access•Konrad Gray, Jacqueline Loos et al.•ARTICLE•AMBIO•2026•References: 115

    Calls for social-ecological restoration have emerged to help transcend traditional ecological boundaries by including plural values as well as transdisciplinary processes. Inspired by the IPBES values typology, we used questionnaires to assess four multi-layered perspectives characterizing local actors in two transdisciplinary grassland restoration projects in Germany: Broad values, specific values, knowledge, and visions for restoration outcomes…

  • Weaving values, knowledge and context to care for human–nature relationships in protected areas

    Open Access•Miguel Á Cebrián-Piqueras, Carena J Van Riper et al.•ARTICLE•People and Nature•2025

    Transformative change necessitates a profound shift in how people relate to, understand, value and envision landscapes to find effective pathways for conservation science and practice. In response, we examined the relationships among broad values—biospheric, altruistic and egoistic—that work in conjunction with ecological knowledge acquisition and social–ecological contextual factors to explain specific values assigned to landscapes, visions for …

  • Navigating across individual and deliberative values: A dual Q‐method approach to elicit diverse values in grassland restoration

    Open Access•Miguel Á Cebrián-Piqueras, Konrad Gray et al.•ARTICLE•People and Nature•2025

    The current ‘UN Decade on Restoration’ calls for collaboration between scientists and practitioners to formulate guidelines for ecosystem restoration, within which transdisciplinary approaches are imperative to rethink the diverse values associated with nature, paving the way for sustainable ecosystem restoration. In our study, conducted within a real‐world laboratory for grassland restoration in Germany, we employed an individual and a deliberat…

  • How methods influence nature's values we find – A comparison of three elicitation methods

    Open Access•Lukas Kuhn, Miguel Á Cebrián-Piqueras et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 2

    Recent research has called for eliciting plural values of nature, yet little is known on how the choice of methods impacts the different values elicited. Drawing on the notion of methods as value-articulating institutions and using grasslands restoration as a case study, we explored how different elicitation methods influence people's value expressions towards grasslands. We did so in three different ways: (i) comparing values between elicitation…

  • Broad values as the basis for understanding deliberation about protected area management

    Open Access•Devin J Goodson, Carena J Van Riper et al.•ARTICLE•Sustainability Science•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 20

  • Disentangling the practice of landscape approaches: A Q-method analysis on experiences in socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes

    Open Access•Mario Torralba, Maiko Nishi et al.•ARTICLE•Sustainability Science•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 5

    Landscape approaches are gaining momentum in both scientific and policy agendas. However, landscape approaches comprise a multitude of concepts, approaches and principles, which are in part similar, in some parts different or even contradictory. In this paper, we used a Q-method questionnaire to explore how landscape approaches are understood and employed in 45 case studies of socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes derived from the …

  • Navigating tensions in inclusive conservation: Learning from the Utrechtse Heuvelrug National Park in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Ciska Ulug, Miguel Á Cebrián-Piqueras et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 7

    Inclusive conservation is promoted as a means to integrate stakeholders in nature, conservation. Despite several studies recognizing that inclusive conservation of protected areas may be challenging and requires explicitly addressing potential tensions between stakeholders, little research has unpacked how these tensions manifest in specific contexts. This paper aims to explore possible approaches for navigating tensions to improve the facilitati…

  • Visualizing stakeholders' willingness for collective action in participatory scenario planning

    Open Access•María D López-Rodríguez, María D López‐Rodríguez et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2023

    Participatory scenario planning is a powerful approach to guide diverse stakeholders in creating and reflecting on visions of plausible and desired futures. However, this process requires tools to guide collective action to implement such visions within management agendas. This study develops, applies, and analyzes a novel visual tool within a virtual participatory scenario planning process about the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Madrid, Sp…

  • Leverage points and levers of inclusive conservation in protected areas

    Open Access•Miguel Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel Á Cebrián-Piqueras et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2023•Cited by: 3

    Inclusive conservation approaches that effectively conserve biodiversity while improving human well-being are gaining traction in the face of the sixth mass extinction of biodiversity. Despite much theorization on the governance of inclusive conservation, empirical research on its practical implementation is urgently needed. Here, using a correlation network analysis and drawing on empirical results from 263 sites described on the web platform of…

  • The relationship between values and knowledge in visioning for landscape management: Relevance for a collaborative approach

    Open Access•Andra-Ioana Horcea-Milcu, Sara Zaman et al.•ARTICLE•Ecosystems and People•2022

    Respecting connections between the diversity of values and forms of knowledge is essential to support a decision-making that fosters relationships between ecosystems and people. However, little theory has been developed for clarifying interactions between values and knowledge, and their relevance for environmental policy. We surfaced the overlooked relationship between values and knowledge by studying individual cognitive and emotional processes …

  • How stable are visions for protected area management? Stakeholder perspectives before and during a pandemic

    Open Access•Veronica Lo, María D López‐Rodríguez et al.•ARTICLE•People and Nature•2022

    Envisioning processes enable protected area managers to chart a course for future management to reach desired goals, but unexpected changes that could affect future visions are not usually considered. The global COVID‐19 pandemic provided an opportunity to explore changes in stakeholder visions, the values that underpin the visions, and their perceptions of landscape changes and the underlying drivers (e.g. climate change, mass tourism and demogr…

  • Perceived inclusivity and trust in protected area management decisions among stakeholders in Alaska

    Open Access•Devin J Goodson, Carena J Van Riper et al.•ARTICLE•People and Nature•2022

    The success of conservation initiatives often depends on the inclusion of diverse stakeholder interests in the decision‐making process. Yet, there is a paucity of empirical knowledge concerning the factors that explain why stakeholders do—or do not— believe that they are meaningfully represented by government agencies. Our study provides insight into the relationship between trust and stakeholder perceptions of inclusivity in public land manageme…

  • Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects

    Open Access•Christopher M Raymond, Miguel Á Cebrián-Piqueras et al.•ARTICLE•One Earth•2022

    The draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes and represents a ‘‘relational turn’’ in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although ‘‘inclusivity’’ is drawn on as a means to engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing of inclusivity can create new tensions with regard to how to manage protected areas. We first offer a set of tensions that emerge in the light of the relational tu…

  • Values shift in response to social learning through deliberation about protected areas

    Open Access•Riley Andrade, Carena J Van Riper et al.•ARTICLE•Global Environmental Change•2022•Cited by: 4•References: 13

  • Delineating participation in conservation governance: Insights from the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain)

    Open Access•María D López‐Rodríguez, M D López-Rodríguez et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2020•Cited by: 3•References: 9

    The active participation of local stakeholders in governing protected areas is increasingly recognized in biodiversity conservation. While progress has been made in countries to facilitate inclusivity in conservation decision-making, there is limited practical guidance of participatory mechanisms enabling stakeholder engagement. Disentangling formal and informal governance arrangements within protected areas illuminates how stakeholder participat…

  • Values shift in response to social learning through deliberation about protected areas

    Open Access•Riley Andrade, Carena J Van Riper et al.•ARTICLE•Global Environmental Change•2022•Cited by: 4•References: 13

  • Leverage points and levers of inclusive conservation in protected areas

    Open Access•Miguel Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel Á Cebrián-Piqueras et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2023•Cited by: 3

    Inclusive conservation approaches that effectively conserve biodiversity while improving human well-being are gaining traction in the face of the sixth mass extinction of biodiversity. Despite much theorization on the governance of inclusive conservation, empirical research on its practical implementation is urgently needed. Here, using a correlation network analysis and drawing on empirical results from 263 sites described on the web platform of…

  • Delineating participation in conservation governance: Insights from the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain)

    Open Access•María D López‐Rodríguez, M D López-Rodríguez et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2020•Cited by: 3•References: 9

    The active participation of local stakeholders in governing protected areas is increasingly recognized in biodiversity conservation. While progress has been made in countries to facilitate inclusivity in conservation decision-making, there is limited practical guidance of participatory mechanisms enabling stakeholder engagement. Disentangling formal and informal governance arrangements within protected areas illuminates how stakeholder participat…

  • Broad values as the basis for understanding deliberation about protected area management

    Open Access•Devin J Goodson, Carena J Van Riper et al.•ARTICLE•Sustainability Science•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 20

  • Disentangling the practice of landscape approaches: A Q-method analysis on experiences in socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes

    Open Access•Mario Torralba, Maiko Nishi et al.•ARTICLE•Sustainability Science•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 5

    Landscape approaches are gaining momentum in both scientific and policy agendas. However, landscape approaches comprise a multitude of concepts, approaches and principles, which are in part similar, in some parts different or even contradictory. In this paper, we used a Q-method questionnaire to explore how landscape approaches are understood and employed in 45 case studies of socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes derived from the …

  • Navigating tensions in inclusive conservation: Learning from the Utrechtse Heuvelrug National Park in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Ciska Ulug, Miguel Á Cebrián-Piqueras et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 7

    Inclusive conservation is promoted as a means to integrate stakeholders in nature, conservation. Despite several studies recognizing that inclusive conservation of protected areas may be challenging and requires explicitly addressing potential tensions between stakeholders, little research has unpacked how these tensions manifest in specific contexts. This paper aims to explore possible approaches for navigating tensions to improve the facilitati…

  • How methods influence nature's values we find – A comparison of three elicitation methods

    Open Access•Lukas Kuhn, Miguel Á Cebrián-Piqueras et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 2

    Recent research has called for eliciting plural values of nature, yet little is known on how the choice of methods impacts the different values elicited. Drawing on the notion of methods as value-articulating institutions and using grasslands restoration as a case study, we explored how different elicitation methods influence people's value expressions towards grasslands. We did so in three different ways: (i) comparing values between elicitation…

  • Delineating participation in conservation governance: Insights from the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain)

    Open Access•María D López‐Rodríguez, M D López-Rodríguez et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2020•Cited by: 3•References: 9

    The active participation of local stakeholders in governing protected areas is increasingly recognized in biodiversity conservation. While progress has been made in countries to facilitate inclusivity in conservation decision-making, there is limited practical guidance of participatory mechanisms enabling stakeholder engagement. Disentangling formal and informal governance arrangements within protected areas illuminates how stakeholder participat…

  • The relationship between values and knowledge in visioning for landscape management: Relevance for a collaborative approach

    Open Access•Andra-Ioana Horcea-Milcu, Sara Zaman et al.•ARTICLE•Ecosystems and People•2022

    Respecting connections between the diversity of values and forms of knowledge is essential to support a decision-making that fosters relationships between ecosystems and people. However, little theory has been developed for clarifying interactions between values and knowledge, and their relevance for environmental policy. We surfaced the overlooked relationship between values and knowledge by studying individual cognitive and emotional processes …

  • How stable are visions for protected area management? Stakeholder perspectives before and during a pandemic

    Open Access•Veronica Lo, María D López‐Rodríguez et al.•ARTICLE•People and Nature•2022

    Envisioning processes enable protected area managers to chart a course for future management to reach desired goals, but unexpected changes that could affect future visions are not usually considered. The global COVID‐19 pandemic provided an opportunity to explore changes in stakeholder visions, the values that underpin the visions, and their perceptions of landscape changes and the underlying drivers (e.g. climate change, mass tourism and demogr…

  • Perceived inclusivity and trust in protected area management decisions among stakeholders in Alaska

    Open Access•Devin J Goodson, Carena J Van Riper et al.•ARTICLE•People and Nature•2022

    The success of conservation initiatives often depends on the inclusion of diverse stakeholder interests in the decision‐making process. Yet, there is a paucity of empirical knowledge concerning the factors that explain why stakeholders do—or do not— believe that they are meaningfully represented by government agencies. Our study provides insight into the relationship between trust and stakeholder perceptions of inclusivity in public land manageme…

  • Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects

    Open Access•Christopher M Raymond, Miguel Á Cebrián-Piqueras et al.•ARTICLE•One Earth•2022

    The draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes and represents a ‘‘relational turn’’ in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although ‘‘inclusivity’’ is drawn on as a means to engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing of inclusivity can create new tensions with regard to how to manage protected areas. We first offer a set of tensions that emerge in the light of the relational tu…

  • Values shift in response to social learning through deliberation about protected areas

    Open Access•Riley Andrade, Carena J Van Riper et al.•ARTICLE•Global Environmental Change•2022•Cited by: 4•References: 13

  • Broad values as the basis for understanding deliberation about protected area management

    Open Access•Devin J Goodson, Carena J Van Riper et al.•ARTICLE•Sustainability Science•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 20

  • Disentangling the practice of landscape approaches: A Q-method analysis on experiences in socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes

    Open Access•Mario Torralba, Maiko Nishi et al.•ARTICLE•Sustainability Science•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 5

    Landscape approaches are gaining momentum in both scientific and policy agendas. However, landscape approaches comprise a multitude of concepts, approaches and principles, which are in part similar, in some parts different or even contradictory. In this paper, we used a Q-method questionnaire to explore how landscape approaches are understood and employed in 45 case studies of socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes derived from the …

  • Navigating tensions in inclusive conservation: Learning from the Utrechtse Heuvelrug National Park in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Ciska Ulug, Miguel Á Cebrián-Piqueras et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 7

    Inclusive conservation is promoted as a means to integrate stakeholders in nature, conservation. Despite several studies recognizing that inclusive conservation of protected areas may be challenging and requires explicitly addressing potential tensions between stakeholders, little research has unpacked how these tensions manifest in specific contexts. This paper aims to explore possible approaches for navigating tensions to improve the facilitati…

  • Visualizing stakeholders' willingness for collective action in participatory scenario planning

    Open Access•María D López-Rodríguez, María D López‐Rodríguez et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2023

    Participatory scenario planning is a powerful approach to guide diverse stakeholders in creating and reflecting on visions of plausible and desired futures. However, this process requires tools to guide collective action to implement such visions within management agendas. This study develops, applies, and analyzes a novel visual tool within a virtual participatory scenario planning process about the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Madrid, Sp…

  • Leverage points and levers of inclusive conservation in protected areas

    Open Access•Miguel Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel Á Cebrián-Piqueras et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2023•Cited by: 3

    Inclusive conservation approaches that effectively conserve biodiversity while improving human well-being are gaining traction in the face of the sixth mass extinction of biodiversity. Despite much theorization on the governance of inclusive conservation, empirical research on its practical implementation is urgently needed. Here, using a correlation network analysis and drawing on empirical results from 263 sites described on the web platform of…

  • Weaving values, knowledge and context to care for human–nature relationships in protected areas

    Open Access•Miguel Á Cebrián-Piqueras, Carena J Van Riper et al.•ARTICLE•People and Nature•2025

    Transformative change necessitates a profound shift in how people relate to, understand, value and envision landscapes to find effective pathways for conservation science and practice. In response, we examined the relationships among broad values—biospheric, altruistic and egoistic—that work in conjunction with ecological knowledge acquisition and social–ecological contextual factors to explain specific values assigned to landscapes, visions for …

  • Navigating across individual and deliberative values: A dual Q‐method approach to elicit diverse values in grassland restoration

    Open Access•Miguel Á Cebrián-Piqueras, Konrad Gray et al.•ARTICLE•People and Nature•2025

    The current ‘UN Decade on Restoration’ calls for collaboration between scientists and practitioners to formulate guidelines for ecosystem restoration, within which transdisciplinary approaches are imperative to rethink the diverse values associated with nature, paving the way for sustainable ecosystem restoration. In our study, conducted within a real‐world laboratory for grassland restoration in Germany, we employed an individual and a deliberat…

  • How methods influence nature's values we find – A comparison of three elicitation methods

    Open Access•Lukas Kuhn, Miguel Á Cebrián-Piqueras et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 2

    Recent research has called for eliciting plural values of nature, yet little is known on how the choice of methods impacts the different values elicited. Drawing on the notion of methods as value-articulating institutions and using grasslands restoration as a case study, we explored how different elicitation methods influence people's value expressions towards grasslands. We did so in three different ways: (i) comparing values between elicitation…

  • Multifaceted landscapes for grassland restoration: Exploring individual perceptions on grasslands through photovoice

    Open Access•Konrad Gray, Anita Kirmer et al.•ARTICLE•Ecosystems and People•2026

    Reconnecting humans and nature, along with reversing the trend of biodiversity loss, are among the most pressing challenges of our times. Grassland restoration offers a promising pathway to halt and reverse biodiversity decline. Since local people are central to maintaining biodiversity and equally benefit from nature, transdisciplinary and social-ecological approaches to restoration are key to achieving sustainable outcomes. These approaches go …

  • A multi-layered values-based approach to advance social-ecological restoration: Insights from real-world laboratories in Germany

    Open Access•Konrad Gray, Jacqueline Loos et al.•ARTICLE•AMBIO•2026•References: 115

    Calls for social-ecological restoration have emerged to help transcend traditional ecological boundaries by including plural values as well as transdisciplinary processes. Inspired by the IPBES values typology, we used questionnaires to assess four multi-layered perspectives characterizing local actors in two transdisciplinary grassland restoration projects in Germany: Broad values, specific values, knowledge, and visions for restoration outcomes…

Political science (9 works) · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (8 works) · Geography (8 works) · Sociology (8 works) · Ecology (7 works) · Environmental resource management (7 works) · Environmental planning (6 works) · Land Use and Ecosystem Services (6 works) · Public relations (6 works) · Vision (6 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae