Øyvind S Tefre
Biographic Data
| ID | 6026006 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Øyvind S Tefre |
| GIVEN NAMES | Øyvind S |
| FAMILY NAME | Tefre |
| SIGNATURE | TEFRE Ø S |
| AFFILIATIONS | Høgskolen i Bergen |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 6 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
The Child’s Best Interests and the Politics of Adoptions from Care in Norway
This paper examines how Norway turned to a more active policy on adoption in the child welfare system. It examines the full public records from all four times that the government and Storting debated adoption from care, over the period 2002–2013. I analyse the empirical and normative arguments that shaped policy, through a discourse theoretical framework (Habermas, 1996) to distinguish different types of arguments. The Article contributes an empi…
Maternal Intellectual Disability and Infant Neglect
This paper examines how a sample of 297 child welfare workers in Norway, England and the state of California in the USA assess risk based on a vignette that combines parent intellectual disability and infant neglect. The study combines fixed-choice and open-ended questions. Workers first attach a risk score to the case and then explain in their own words the reasons behind their assessment. Key findings show that workers across all countries agre…
The justifications for terminating parental rights and adoption in the United States
The Child’s Best Interests and the Politics of Adoptions from Care in Norway
This paper examines how Norway turned to a more active policy on adoption in the child welfare system. It examines the full public records from all four times that the government and Storting debated adoption from care, over the period 2002–2013. I analyse the empirical and normative arguments that shaped policy, through a discourse theoretical framework (Habermas, 1996) to distinguish different types of arguments. The Article contributes an empi…
The justifications for terminating parental rights and adoption in the United States
Maternal Intellectual Disability and Infant Neglect
This paper examines how a sample of 297 child welfare workers in Norway, England and the state of California in the USA assess risk based on a vignette that combines parent intellectual disability and infant neglect. The study combines fixed-choice and open-ended questions. Workers first attach a risk score to the case and then explain in their own words the reasons behind their assessment. Key findings show that workers across all countries agre…
The justifications for terminating parental rights and adoption in the United States
Maternal Intellectual Disability and Infant Neglect
This paper examines how a sample of 297 child welfare workers in Norway, England and the state of California in the USA assess risk based on a vignette that combines parent intellectual disability and infant neglect. The study combines fixed-choice and open-ended questions. Workers first attach a risk score to the case and then explain in their own words the reasons behind their assessment. Key findings show that workers across all countries agre…
The Child’s Best Interests and the Politics of Adoptions from Care in Norway
This paper examines how Norway turned to a more active policy on adoption in the child welfare system. It examines the full public records from all four times that the government and Storting debated adoption from care, over the period 2002–2013. I analyse the empirical and normative arguments that shaped policy, through a discourse theoretical framework (Habermas, 1996) to distinguish different types of arguments. The Article contributes an empi…
Political science (3 works) · Child Welfare and Adoption (2 works) · Children's Rights and Participation (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Welfare (2 works) · Borderline intellectual functioning (1 work)