Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Juan Carlos Squitieri

Biographic Data

ID6037298
NAMEJuan Carlos Squitieri
GIVEN NAMESJuan Carlos
FAMILY NAMESquitieri
SIGNATURESQUITIERI J C
AFFILIATIONSUAM Iztapalapa, CDMX, México
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS1
TOTAL CITATIONS1
WORKS AS AUTHOR1
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2019
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2019
H-INDEX1
  • What Can Mechanisms Do for You? Mechanisms and the Problem of Confounders in the Social Sciences

    Open Access•María Jiménez-Buedo, Juan Carlos Squitieri•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 19

    The idea that mechanisms are crucially important to differentiate between genuine and spurious causal relations is ubiquitous both in the philosophical and in the social scientific literature. Yet philosophers of the social sciences have seldom attempted to spell out systematically the way in which mechanistic reasoning or evidence are concretely used to deal with spurious association and the problem of confounders in the social sciences. In this…

  • What Can Mechanisms Do for You? Mechanisms and the Problem of Confounders in the Social Sciences

    Open Access•María Jiménez-Buedo, Juan Carlos Squitieri•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 19

    The idea that mechanisms are crucially important to differentiate between genuine and spurious causal relations is ubiquitous both in the philosophical and in the social scientific literature. Yet philosophers of the social sciences have seldom attempted to spell out systematically the way in which mechanistic reasoning or evidence are concretely used to deal with spurious association and the problem of confounders in the social sciences. In this…

  • What Can Mechanisms Do for You? Mechanisms and the Problem of Confounders in the Social Sciences

    Open Access•María Jiménez-Buedo, Juan Carlos Squitieri•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 19

    The idea that mechanisms are crucially important to differentiate between genuine and spurious causal relations is ubiquitous both in the philosophical and in the social scientific literature. Yet philosophers of the social sciences have seldom attempted to spell out systematically the way in which mechanistic reasoning or evidence are concretely used to deal with spurious association and the problem of confounders in the social sciences. In this…

Association (psychology) (1 work) · Causality (physics) (1 work) · Causation (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Epistemology (1 work) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 work) · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (1 work) · Mechanism (biology) (1 work) · Philosophy (1 work) · Philosophy and History of Science (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae