Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Aaron B Strauss

Biographic Data

ID6037856
NAMEAaron B Strauss
GIVEN NAMESAaron B
FAMILY NAMEStrauss
SIGNATURESTRAUSS A B
AFFILIATIONSMellman Group, 1023 31st St. NW, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20007, USA,
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS86
WORKS AS AUTHOR3
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2005
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2010
H-INDEX2
  • Uncertain candidates, valence, and the dynamics of candidate position-taking

    Open Access•Michael Bruter, Robert S Erikson et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2010•Cited by: 10•References: 10

  • The Implications of High Court Docket Control for Resource Allocation and Legal Efficiency

    Open Access•Tom S Clark, Aaron Strau et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2010•Cited by: 2•References: 10

    A key source of institutional variation across judicial systems is the degree of control that the highest court has over its docket. Despite this variation, the consequences of various institutional designs in judicial hierarchies remain relatively unexplored by the theoretical literature. In this article, we develop a formal model of high court resource allocation. We analyze the model under two institutional designs: (1) the Court must allocate…

  • Voting Weights and Formateur Advantages in the Formation of Coalition Governments

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2005•Cited by: 74•References: 68

    Over the last two decades a large and important literature has emerged that uses game theoretic models of bargaining to study legislative coalitions. To test key predictions of these models, we examine the composition of coalition governments from 1946 and 2001. These predictions are almost always expressed in terms of parties' minimal-integer voting weights. We calculate such weights for all parliamentary parties. In addition, we develop a stati…

  • Voting Weights and Formateur Advantages in the Formation of Coalition Governments

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2005•Cited by: 74•References: 68

    Over the last two decades a large and important literature has emerged that uses game theoretic models of bargaining to study legislative coalitions. To test key predictions of these models, we examine the composition of coalition governments from 1946 and 2001. These predictions are almost always expressed in terms of parties' minimal-integer voting weights. We calculate such weights for all parliamentary parties. In addition, we develop a stati…

  • Uncertain candidates, valence, and the dynamics of candidate position-taking

    Open Access•Michael Bruter, Robert S Erikson et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2010•Cited by: 10•References: 10

  • The Implications of High Court Docket Control for Resource Allocation and Legal Efficiency

    Open Access•Tom S Clark, Aaron Strau et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2010•Cited by: 2•References: 10

    A key source of institutional variation across judicial systems is the degree of control that the highest court has over its docket. Despite this variation, the consequences of various institutional designs in judicial hierarchies remain relatively unexplored by the theoretical literature. In this article, we develop a formal model of high court resource allocation. We analyze the model under two institutional designs: (1) the Court must allocate…

  • Voting Weights and Formateur Advantages in the Formation of Coalition Governments

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2005•Cited by: 74•References: 68

    Over the last two decades a large and important literature has emerged that uses game theoretic models of bargaining to study legislative coalitions. To test key predictions of these models, we examine the composition of coalition governments from 1946 and 2001. These predictions are almost always expressed in terms of parties' minimal-integer voting weights. We calculate such weights for all parliamentary parties. In addition, we develop a stati…

  • Uncertain candidates, valence, and the dynamics of candidate position-taking

    Open Access•Michael Bruter, Robert S Erikson et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2010•Cited by: 10•References: 10

  • The Implications of High Court Docket Control for Resource Allocation and Legal Efficiency

    Open Access•Tom S Clark, Aaron Strau et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2010•Cited by: 2•References: 10

    A key source of institutional variation across judicial systems is the degree of control that the highest court has over its docket. Despite this variation, the consequences of various institutional designs in judicial hierarchies remain relatively unexplored by the theoretical literature. In this article, we develop a formal model of high court resource allocation. We analyze the model under two institutional designs: (1) the Court must allocate…

Economics (3 works) · Econometrics (2 works) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 works) · Game Theory and Voting Systems (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Microeconomics (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Business (1 work) · Cabinet (room (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae