Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

David S Schwartz

Biographic Data

ID6039090
NAMEDavid S Schwartz
GIVEN NAMESDavid S
FAMILY NAMESchwartz
SIGNATURESCHWARTZ D S
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Wisconsin Law School
ORCID0000-0002-5700-1384
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS2
TOTAL CITATIONS1
WORKS AS AUTHOR2
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2019
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX1
  • The oldest constitutional question

    Open Access•David S Schwartz•ARTICLE•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2026•References: 1

  • What is relative plausibility

    Open Access•David S Schwartz, Elliott Sober•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2019•Cited by: 1

    Allen and Pardo’s explanation of Relative Plausibility as a theory of evidence and proof in litigation is ambiguous and underspecified. Their account suggests at least three different interpretations of what they mean. They might be advocating “anti-halfism,” which tracks the “conventional account” but merely rejects >0.5 as the proper standard of proof. Or they might be advocating “probabilistic holism,” in which trial decision-makers apply prob…

  • What is relative plausibility

    Open Access•David S Schwartz, Elliott Sober•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2019•Cited by: 1

    Allen and Pardo’s explanation of Relative Plausibility as a theory of evidence and proof in litigation is ambiguous and underspecified. Their account suggests at least three different interpretations of what they mean. They might be advocating “anti-halfism,” which tracks the “conventional account” but merely rejects >0.5 as the proper standard of proof. Or they might be advocating “probabilistic holism,” in which trial decision-makers apply prob…

  • What is relative plausibility

    Open Access•David S Schwartz, Elliott Sober•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2019•Cited by: 1

    Allen and Pardo’s explanation of Relative Plausibility as a theory of evidence and proof in litigation is ambiguous and underspecified. Their account suggests at least three different interpretations of what they mean. They might be advocating “anti-halfism,” which tracks the “conventional account” but merely rejects >0.5 as the proper standard of proof. Or they might be advocating “probabilistic holism,” in which trial decision-makers apply prob…

  • The oldest constitutional question

    Open Access•David S Schwartz•ARTICLE•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2026•References: 1

Aside (1 work) · Axiom (1 work) · Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (1 work) · Decision theory (1 work) · Education, Psychology, and Complexity Research (1 work) · Enumeration (1 work) · Epistemology (1 work) · George (robot) (1 work) · Holism (1 work) · Interpretation (philosophy (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae