Susan DeFrancesco
Biographic Data
| ID | 6066813 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Susan DeFrancesco |
| GIVEN NAMES | Susan |
| FAMILY NAME | DeFrancesco |
| SIGNATURE | DEFRANCESCO S |
| AFFILIATIONS | Carol W. Runyan is with the Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora. Kathleen F. Carlson and Susan DeFrancesco are with the Oregon Health & Science University–Portland State University School of Public Health, and the Health Services Research and Development Service Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR. Renee M. Johnson is with the Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2003 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of Oregon’s Extreme Risk Protection Order Law
Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) laws are a promising strategy for preventing firearm violence through risk-based firearm restrictions, but effectiveness hinges on implementation. Oregon's ERPO law went into effect in 2018, but utilization has varied across the state. We interviewed professionals involved in ERPO implementation to understand barriers and facilitators to the use of ERPOs for violence prevention in Oregon. Semi-structured inter…
Professional Training and Public Education Can Support Extreme Risk Protection Order Utilization
Twenty-one states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands have passed Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) laws, risk-based firearm removal policies intended to reduce firearm violence. Oregon's ERPO law, which went into effect in 2018, allows family/household members and law enforcement officers (LEOs) to petition a civil court for an order to temporarily restrict one's access to firearms if the individual is at imminent risk of h…
Five Years of Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Oregon
Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) laws have received increasing attention as a tool to prevent firearm suicide and homicide, including mass shootings. However, important gaps remain in our understanding of ERPO usage and implementation. Using the Oregon Judicial Case Information Network database, we abstracted data from all ERPO petitions filed in Oregon from 2018 to 2022, the first five years after the law took effect ( N = 649). ERPO petitio…
Violence and Injury Curricula Still Inadequate in Public Health Schools and Programs—A Call to Action
How willing are parents to improve pedestrian safety in their community
Study objective: To determine how likely parents would be to contribute to strategies to reduce pedestrian injury risks and how much they valued such interventions. Design: A single referendum willingness to pay survey. Each parent was randomised to respond to one of five requested contributions towards each of the following activities: constructing speed bumps, volunteering as a crossing guard, attending a neighbourhood meeting, or attending a s…
No prominent works on this page.
How willing are parents to improve pedestrian safety in their community
Study objective: To determine how likely parents would be to contribute to strategies to reduce pedestrian injury risks and how much they valued such interventions. Design: A single referendum willingness to pay survey. Each parent was randomised to respond to one of five requested contributions towards each of the following activities: constructing speed bumps, volunteering as a crossing guard, attending a neighbourhood meeting, or attending a s…
Violence and Injury Curricula Still Inadequate in Public Health Schools and Programs—A Call to Action
Five Years of Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Oregon
Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) laws have received increasing attention as a tool to prevent firearm suicide and homicide, including mass shootings. However, important gaps remain in our understanding of ERPO usage and implementation. Using the Oregon Judicial Case Information Network database, we abstracted data from all ERPO petitions filed in Oregon from 2018 to 2022, the first five years after the law took effect ( N = 649). ERPO petitio…
Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of Oregon’s Extreme Risk Protection Order Law
Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) laws are a promising strategy for preventing firearm violence through risk-based firearm restrictions, but effectiveness hinges on implementation. Oregon's ERPO law went into effect in 2018, but utilization has varied across the state. We interviewed professionals involved in ERPO implementation to understand barriers and facilitators to the use of ERPOs for violence prevention in Oregon. Semi-structured inter…
Professional Training and Public Education Can Support Extreme Risk Protection Order Utilization
Twenty-one states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands have passed Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) laws, risk-based firearm removal policies intended to reduce firearm violence. Oregon's ERPO law, which went into effect in 2018, allows family/household members and law enforcement officers (LEOs) to petition a civil court for an order to temporarily restrict one's access to firearms if the individual is at imminent risk of h…
Poison control (5 works) · Environmental health (4 works) · Gun Ownership and Violence Research (4 works) · Medicine (4 works) · Suicide prevention (4 works) · Law enforcement (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Crime Patterns and Interventions (2 works) · Enforcement (2 works) · Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (2 works)