Stephanie A Kraft

Biographic Data

ID6070149
NAMEStephanie A Kraft
GIVEN NAMESStephanie A
FAMILY NAMEKraft
SIGNATUREKRAFT S A
AFFILIATIONSStanford University
ORCID0000-0002-2862-7601
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS9
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR9
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2015
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX0

  • Can Open Science Advance Health Justice? Genomic Research Dissemination in the Evolving Data‐Sharing Landscape

    Open AccessStephanie A Kraft, Kathleen F MittendorfARTICLEThe Hastings Center Report2024

    Scientific data‐sharing and open science initiatives are increasingly important mechanisms for advancing the impact of genomic research. These mechanisms are being implemented as growing attention is paid to the need to improve the inclusion of research participants from marginalized and underrepresented groups. Together, these efforts aim to promote equitable advancements in genomic medicine. However, if not guided by community‐informed protecti…

  • Centering Patients’ Voices in Artificial Intelligence‒Based Telemedicine

    Stephanie A KraftARTICLEAmerican Journal of Public Health2023References: 6

    Centering Patients' Voices in Artificial Intelligence‒Based Telemedicine Stephanie A. Kraft JD Affiliation Stephanie A. Kraft is with the Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, and the Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle. CopyRightCorrespondence should be sent to Stephanie A. Kraft, c/o Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1900 Ninth Ave, M/S JMB-6, Seattle…

  • Lessons learned about publication of results of community surveys when regulatory oversight has not occurred

    Open AccessC Roman, Alexandra C H Nowakowski et al.ARTICLESSM - Qualitative Research in…2022

    We conducted a survey in an online forum without prior IRB approval which yielded information we wanted to share with the medical community. We sought approaches to ethically publish the survey's results. Address the ethical issues raised by considering publication of community forum perspectives without prior regulatory oversight or written informed consent. A research ethics consultation identified two approaches: 1) assessing community perspec…

  • Toward Meeting the Obligation of Respect for Persons in Pragmatic Clinical Trials

    Open AccessStephanie R Morain, Stephanie A Kraft et al.ARTICLEThe Hastings Center Report2022

    Research ethics oversight systems have traditionally emphasized the informed consent process as the primary means by which to demonstrate respect for prospective subjects. Yet how researchers can best fulfill the ethical obligations of respect for persons in pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs)—particularly those that may alter or waive informed consent—remains unknown. We propose eight dimensions of demonstrating respect in PCTs: (1) engaging patien…

  • Demonstrating ‘respect for persons’ in clinical research

    Stephanie A Kraft, Erin Rothwell et al.ARTICLEJournal of Medical Ethics2021

    The ethical principle of ‘respect for persons’ in clinical research has traditionally focused on protecting individuals’ autonomy rights, but respect for participants also includes broader, although less well understood, ethical obligations to regard individuals’ rights, needs, interests and feelings. However, there is little empirical evidence about how to effectively convey respect to potential and current participants. To fill this gap, we con…

  • Exploring Ethical Concerns About Human Challenge Studies

    Open AccessStephanie A Kraft, Devan M Duenas et al.ARTICLEJournal of Empirical Research on…2018References: 3

    Controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) studies deliberately infect healthy participants with malaria to test interventions faster and more efficiently. Some argue the study design and high payments offered raise ethical concerns about participants' understanding of risks and undue inducement. We conducted baseline and exit interviews with 16 CHMI study participants to explore these concerns. Participants described themes including decision-mak…

  • Informed decision-making about prenatal cfDNA screening

    Open AccessMarsha Michie, Stephanie A Kraft et al.ARTICLEEthics Medicine and Public Health2016

  • “I think we’ve got too many tests!”

    Open AccessBetsy L Gammon, Stephanie A Kraft et al.ARTICLEEthics Medicine and Public Health2016

  • Research on Medical Practices and the Patient-Physician Relationship

    Open AccessStephanie A Kraft, Kathryn M Porter et al.ARTICLEThe AMA Journal of Ethic2015

    Research on medical practices involves comparing treatments in the clinical context in which they are used; 2014 draft regulatory guidance inaccurately categorizes the risks of treatments being studied as risks of the research itself, which could hamper the use of simplified informed consent processes that patients and researchers may prefer