Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Carl Cranor

Biographic Data

ID6078648
NAMECarl Cranor
GIVEN NAMESCarl
FAMILY NAMECranor
SIGNATURECRANOR C
AFFILIATIONSThe author is with the University of California, Riverside.
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS2
TOTAL CITATIONS4
WORKS AS AUTHOR2
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1979
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2005
H-INDEX1
  • Scientific Inferences in the Laboratory and the Law

    Carl F Cranor, Carl Cranor•ARTICLE•American Journal of Public Health•2005•Cited by: 4•References: 17

    Following the Supreme Court’s Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc decision, courts have struggled in reviewing scientific evidence and appear to have appreciated insufficiently the nature of scientific reasoning. To assist their evidentiary reviews, courts need to appreciate both scientific complexity and ignorance about human toxicity caused by the universe of chemical substances. Conscientious, well-motivated, respectable experts can com…

  • Legal Obligation

    Carl F Cranor, Carl Cranor•ARTICLE•Social Theory and Practice•1979

  • Scientific Inferences in the Laboratory and the Law

    Carl F Cranor, Carl Cranor•ARTICLE•American Journal of Public Health•2005•Cited by: 4•References: 17

    Following the Supreme Court’s Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc decision, courts have struggled in reviewing scientific evidence and appear to have appreciated insufficiently the nature of scientific reasoning. To assist their evidentiary reviews, courts need to appreciate both scientific complexity and ignorance about human toxicity caused by the universe of chemical substances. Conscientious, well-motivated, respectable experts can com…

  • Legal Obligation

    Carl F Cranor, Carl Cranor•ARTICLE•Social Theory and Practice•1979

  • Scientific Inferences in the Laboratory and the Law

    Carl F Cranor, Carl Cranor•ARTICLE•American Journal of Public Health•2005•Cited by: 4•References: 17

    Following the Supreme Court’s Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc decision, courts have struggled in reviewing scientific evidence and appear to have appreciated insufficiently the nature of scientific reasoning. To assist their evidentiary reviews, courts need to appreciate both scientific complexity and ignorance about human toxicity caused by the universe of chemical substances. Conscientious, well-motivated, respectable experts can com…

Epistemology (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Applied philosophy (1 work) · Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (1 work) · Economic Justice (1 work) · Ethics in Clinical Research (1 work) · Federal Rules of Evidence (1 work) · Historical Legal Studies and Society (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae