Daniel Gubits
Biographic Data
| ID | 6092937 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Daniel Gubits |
| GIVEN NAMES | Daniel |
| FAMILY NAME | Gubits |
| SIGNATURE | GUBITS D |
| AFFILIATIONS | Abt Associates, Rockville, MD, USA |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-2856-2008 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 35 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Embedding a Proof-of-Concept Test in an At-Scale National Policy Experiment
A randomized experiment that measures the impact of a social policy in a sample of the population reveals whether the policy will work on average with universal application. An experiment that includes only the subset of the population that volunteers for the intervention generates narrower “proof-of-concept” evidence of whether the policy can work for motivated individuals. Both forms of learning carry value, yet evaluations rarely combine the t…
What Interventions Work Best for Families Who Experience Homelessness? Impact Estimates from the Family Options Study
What housing and service interventions work best to reduce homelessness for families in the United States? The Family Options Study randomly assigned 2,282 families recruited in homeless shelters across 12 sites to priority access to one of three active interventions or to usual care in their communities. The interventions were long-term rent subsidies, short-term rent subsidies, and transitional housing in supervised programs with intensive psyc…
Can Housing and Service Interventions Reduce Family Separations for Families Who Experience Homelessness
Family break‐up is common in families experiencing homelessness. This paper examines the extent of separations of children from parents and of partners from each other and whether housing and service interventions reduced separations and their precursors among 1,857 families across 12 sites who participated in the Family Options Study. Families in shelters were randomized to offers of one of three interventions: permanent housing subsidies that r…
What Interventions Work Best for Families Who Experience Homelessness? Impact Estimates from the Family Options Study
What housing and service interventions work best to reduce homelessness for families in the United States? The Family Options Study randomly assigned 2,282 families recruited in homeless shelters across 12 sites to priority access to one of three active interventions or to usual care in their communities. The interventions were long-term rent subsidies, short-term rent subsidies, and transitional housing in supervised programs with intensive psyc…
Can Housing and Service Interventions Reduce Family Separations for Families Who Experience Homelessness
Family break‐up is common in families experiencing homelessness. This paper examines the extent of separations of children from parents and of partners from each other and whether housing and service interventions reduced separations and their precursors among 1,857 families across 12 sites who participated in the Family Options Study. Families in shelters were randomized to offers of one of three interventions: permanent housing subsidies that r…
Can Housing and Service Interventions Reduce Family Separations for Families Who Experience Homelessness
Family break‐up is common in families experiencing homelessness. This paper examines the extent of separations of children from parents and of partners from each other and whether housing and service interventions reduced separations and their precursors among 1,857 families across 12 sites who participated in the Family Options Study. Families in shelters were randomized to offers of one of three interventions: permanent housing subsidies that r…
What Interventions Work Best for Families Who Experience Homelessness? Impact Estimates from the Family Options Study
What housing and service interventions work best to reduce homelessness for families in the United States? The Family Options Study randomly assigned 2,282 families recruited in homeless shelters across 12 sites to priority access to one of three active interventions or to usual care in their communities. The interventions were long-term rent subsidies, short-term rent subsidies, and transitional housing in supervised programs with intensive psyc…
Embedding a Proof-of-Concept Test in an At-Scale National Policy Experiment
A randomized experiment that measures the impact of a social policy in a sample of the population reveals whether the policy will work on average with universal application. An experiment that includes only the subset of the population that volunteers for the intervention generates narrower “proof-of-concept” evidence of whether the policy can work for motivated individuals. Both forms of learning carry value, yet evaluations rarely combine the t…
Economics (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Homelessness and Social Issues (2 works) · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (2 works) · Psychiatry (2 works) · Psychological intervention (2 works) · Psychosocial (2 works) · Subsidy (2 works) · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (2 works) · Actuarial science (1 work)