Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Andrew J O'Geen

Biographic Data

ID6097445
NAMEAndrew J O'Geen
GIVEN NAMESAndrew J
FAMILY NAMEO'Geen
SIGNATUREGEEN A J O
AFFILIATIONSDavidson College
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS1
TOTAL CITATIONS2
AUTHOR COUNT1
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2015
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2015
H-INDEX1
  • The Nature of Legal Change on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Andrew J O’geen et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2015•Cited by: 2•References: 31

    Jurisprudential regimes theory (JRT) posits that legal change on the U.S. Supreme Court occurs in a drastic, structural‐break‐like manner. Methodological debates present conflicting evidence for JRT, which has implications for the important law versus ideology debate. We confront this debate by first elaborating two alternative theoretical perspectives to JRT—evolutionary change and legal stability. Our analytical framework focuses on two key sub…

  • The Nature of Legal Change on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Andrew J O’geen et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2015•Cited by: 2•References: 31

    Jurisprudential regimes theory (JRT) posits that legal change on the U.S. Supreme Court occurs in a drastic, structural‐break‐like manner. Methodological debates present conflicting evidence for JRT, which has implications for the important law versus ideology debate. We confront this debate by first elaborating two alternative theoretical perspectives to JRT—evolutionary change and legal stability. Our analytical framework focuses on two key sub…

  • The Nature of Legal Change on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Andrew J O’geen et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2015•Cited by: 2•References: 31

    Jurisprudential regimes theory (JRT) posits that legal change on the U.S. Supreme Court occurs in a drastic, structural‐break‐like manner. Methodological debates present conflicting evidence for JRT, which has implications for the important law versus ideology debate. We confront this debate by first elaborating two alternative theoretical perspectives to JRT—evolutionary change and legal stability. Our analytical framework focuses on two key sub…

Empirical legal studies (1 work) · Ideology (1 work) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (1 work) · Law (1 work) · Law (1 work) · Law and economics (1 work) · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (1 work) · Legal and Constitutional Studies (1 work) · Legal research (1 work) · Political science (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae