Marion Schmidt
Biographic Data
| ID | 6102335 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Marion Schmidt |
| GIVEN NAMES | Marion |
| FAMILY NAME | Schmidt |
| SIGNATURE | SCHMIDT M |
| AFFILIATIONS | German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-6970-3714 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 16 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 15 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 1 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Implicit reporting standards in bibliometric research
The recent surge in bibliometric studies published has been accompanied by increasing diversity in the completeness of reporting these studies’ details, affecting reliability, reproducibility, and robustness. Our study systematises the reporting of bibliometric research using open peer reviews. We examined 182 peer reviews of 85 bibliometric studies published in library and information science (LIS) journals and conference proceedings, and non-LI…
Reference coverage analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus
OpenAlex is a promising open source of scholarly metadata, and competitor to established proprietary sources, such as the Web of Science and Scopus. As OpenAlex provides its data freely and openly, it permits researchers to perform bibliometric studies that can be reproduced in the community without licensing barriers. However, as OpenAlex is a rapidly evolving source and the data contained within is expanding and also quickly changing, the quest…
The data infrastructure of the German Kompetenznetzwerk Bibliometrie
Academic data infrastructures facilitate bibliometric research and reporting, as they link bibliometric data with research interests. In Germany, the Kompetenznetzwerk Bibliometrie (KB), a national consortium of 22 institutions, serves this purpose by hosting, probing, and curating large-scale bibliometric raw data from commercial and open providers. Users at partner institutions regularly apply the data infrastructure in workflows. Due to its fo…
Why do some retracted articles continue to get cited
Retracted publications can still receive a substantial number of citations after the retraction. Little is known about the causes for this phenomenon and the nature of epistemic risk or harm in these retraction cases. Using this phenomenon also as an example for the broader question of how scholarly communities deal with uncertainty in the reception of publications, this case study aims to assess the epistemic contributions of retracted publicati…
Who are the “Heroes of CRISPR”? Public science communication on Wikipedia and the challenge of micro-notability
Wikipedia’s influence in shaping public perceptions of science underscores the significance of scientists being recognized on the platform, as it can impact their careers. Although Wikipedia offers guidelines for determining when a scientist qualifies for their own article, it currently lacks guidance regarding whether a scientist should be acknowledged in articles related to the innovation processes to which they have contributed. To explore how…
A diachronic perspective on citation latency in Wikipedia articles on CRISPR/Cas-9
This paper analyzes Wikipedia’s representation of the Nobel Prize winning CRISPR/Cas9 technology, a method for gene editing. We propose and evaluate different heuristics to match publications from several publication corpora against Wikipedia’s central article on CRISPR and against the complete Wikipedia revision history in order to retrieve further Wikipedia articles relevant to the topic and to analyze Wikipedia’s referencing patterns. We explo…
Social Mendelism
Reviewed by: Social Mendelism: Genetics and the Politics of Race in Germany, 1900–1948 by Amir Teicher Marion Schmidt Amir Teicher. Social Mendelism: Genetics and the Politics of Race in Germany, 1900–1948. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. xii + 280 pp. $34.99 (978-1-108-49949-1). To anyone working on the history of (German) eugenics and genetics, the importance of Mendelism is obvious. Yet, as Amir Teicher points out in Social Mendel…
Dank
Einleitung
Inhalt
Autorenverzeichnis
Zwischen Fremdbestimmung und Autonomie
The visibility of scientific misconduct
Retractions of scientific articles are becoming the most relevant institution for making sense of scientific misconduct. An increasing number of retracted articles, mainly attributed to misconduct, is currently providing a new empirical basis for research about scientific misconduct. This article reviews the relevant research literature from an interdisciplinary context. Furthermore, the results from these studies are contextualized sociologicall…
Planes of phenomenological experience
When, in 1928, the Clarke School for the Deaf in Northampton, Massachusetts, opened a psychological research division, it was nothing unusual in a time fascinated with the sciences of education. Yet with its longstanding ties to Northampton's Smith College, the school was able to secure the collaboration of eminent Gestalt psychologist Kurt Koffka, who, in turn, engaged 2 more German-speaking emigrants, Margarete Eberhardt and social psychologist…
Made to Hear
Cochlear implants for deaf children, a mother observes at the beginning of Laura Mauldin's Made to Hear, have significantly contributed to the decrease of sign language programs in deaf education; ...
Multiple Autisms
No prominent works on this page.
The visibility of scientific misconduct
Retractions of scientific articles are becoming the most relevant institution for making sense of scientific misconduct. An increasing number of retracted articles, mainly attributed to misconduct, is currently providing a new empirical basis for research about scientific misconduct. This article reviews the relevant research literature from an interdisciplinary context. Furthermore, the results from these studies are contextualized sociologicall…
Planes of phenomenological experience
When, in 1928, the Clarke School for the Deaf in Northampton, Massachusetts, opened a psychological research division, it was nothing unusual in a time fascinated with the sciences of education. Yet with its longstanding ties to Northampton's Smith College, the school was able to secure the collaboration of eminent Gestalt psychologist Kurt Koffka, who, in turn, engaged 2 more German-speaking emigrants, Margarete Eberhardt and social psychologist…
Made to Hear
Cochlear implants for deaf children, a mother observes at the beginning of Laura Mauldin's Made to Hear, have significantly contributed to the decrease of sign language programs in deaf education; ...
Multiple Autisms
Dank
Einleitung
Inhalt
Autorenverzeichnis
Zwischen Fremdbestimmung und Autonomie
Social Mendelism
Reviewed by: Social Mendelism: Genetics and the Politics of Race in Germany, 1900–1948 by Amir Teicher Marion Schmidt Amir Teicher. Social Mendelism: Genetics and the Politics of Race in Germany, 1900–1948. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. xii + 280 pp. $34.99 (978-1-108-49949-1). To anyone working on the history of (German) eugenics and genetics, the importance of Mendelism is obvious. Yet, as Amir Teicher points out in Social Mendel…
A diachronic perspective on citation latency in Wikipedia articles on CRISPR/Cas-9
This paper analyzes Wikipedia’s representation of the Nobel Prize winning CRISPR/Cas9 technology, a method for gene editing. We propose and evaluate different heuristics to match publications from several publication corpora against Wikipedia’s central article on CRISPR and against the complete Wikipedia revision history in order to retrieve further Wikipedia articles relevant to the topic and to analyze Wikipedia’s referencing patterns. We explo…
Why do some retracted articles continue to get cited
Retracted publications can still receive a substantial number of citations after the retraction. Little is known about the causes for this phenomenon and the nature of epistemic risk or harm in these retraction cases. Using this phenomenon also as an example for the broader question of how scholarly communities deal with uncertainty in the reception of publications, this case study aims to assess the epistemic contributions of retracted publicati…
Who are the “Heroes of CRISPR”? Public science communication on Wikipedia and the challenge of micro-notability
Wikipedia’s influence in shaping public perceptions of science underscores the significance of scientists being recognized on the platform, as it can impact their careers. Although Wikipedia offers guidelines for determining when a scientist qualifies for their own article, it currently lacks guidance regarding whether a scientist should be acknowledged in articles related to the innovation processes to which they have contributed. To explore how…
Reference coverage analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus
OpenAlex is a promising open source of scholarly metadata, and competitor to established proprietary sources, such as the Web of Science and Scopus. As OpenAlex provides its data freely and openly, it permits researchers to perform bibliometric studies that can be reproduced in the community without licensing barriers. However, as OpenAlex is a rapidly evolving source and the data contained within is expanding and also quickly changing, the quest…
The data infrastructure of the German Kompetenznetzwerk Bibliometrie
Academic data infrastructures facilitate bibliometric research and reporting, as they link bibliometric data with research interests. In Germany, the Kompetenznetzwerk Bibliometrie (KB), a national consortium of 22 institutions, serves this purpose by hosting, probing, and curating large-scale bibliometric raw data from commercial and open providers. Users at partner institutions regularly apply the data infrastructure in workflows. Due to its fo…
Implicit reporting standards in bibliometric research
The recent surge in bibliometric studies published has been accompanied by increasing diversity in the completeness of reporting these studies’ details, affecting reliability, reproducibility, and robustness. Our study systematises the reporting of bibliometric research using open peer reviews. We examined 182 peer reviews of 85 bibliometric studies published in library and information science (LIS) journals and conference proceedings, and non-LI…
Computer Science (8 works) · Political science (7 works) · Data science (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Information retrieval (4 works) · Art (3 works) · Humanities (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Library science (3 works) · Sociology (3 works)