Pauline Ziman
Biographic Data
| ID | 6113515 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Pauline Ziman |
| GIVEN NAMES | Pauline |
| FAMILY NAME | Ziman |
| SIGNATURE | ZIMAN P |
| AFFILIATIONS | PHS Consulting, Ltd. |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2010 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
On statistical measures and ancient writing systems
An article published in Language (Sproat 2014a) questions our findings on the Indus script and Pictish symbols published in the journals Science (Rao et al. 2009a), PNAS (Rao et al. 2009b), IEEE Computer (Rao 2010), and the Proceedings of the Royal Society (Lee et al. 2010a,b). Sproat’s article does not accurately present our methods and findings, and its conclusions are based on what appears to be a misunderstanding of our proposed approach. For…
A Response to Richard Sproat on Random Systems, Writing, and Entropy
In his article "Ancient symbols and computational linguistics" (Sproat 2010), Professor Sproat raised two concerns over a method that we have proposed for analyzing small data sets of symbols using entropy (Lee, Jonathan, and Ziman 2010): first, that the method is unable to detect random but non-equiprobable systems; and second, that it misclassifies kudurru texts.W e address these concerns in the following response. © 2010 Association for Comput…
No prominent works on this page.
A Response to Richard Sproat on Random Systems, Writing, and Entropy
In his article "Ancient symbols and computational linguistics" (Sproat 2010), Professor Sproat raised two concerns over a method that we have proposed for analyzing small data sets of symbols using entropy (Lee, Jonathan, and Ziman 2010): first, that the method is unable to detect random but non-equiprobable systems; and second, that it misclassifies kudurru texts.W e address these concerns in the following response. © 2010 Association for Comput…
On statistical measures and ancient writing systems
An article published in Language (Sproat 2014a) questions our findings on the Indus script and Pictish symbols published in the journals Science (Rao et al. 2009a), PNAS (Rao et al. 2009b), IEEE Computer (Rao 2010), and the Proceedings of the Royal Society (Lee et al. 2010a,b). Sproat’s article does not accurately present our methods and findings, and its conclusions are based on what appears to be a misunderstanding of our proposed approach. For…
Computer Science (2 works) · Language and cultural evolution (2 works) · Linguistics (2 works) · Natural language processing (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Algorithm (1 work) · Artificial Intelligence (1 work) · Authorship Attribution and Profiling (1 work) · Computational linguistics (1 work) · Entropy (arrow of time (1 work)