Jan Peil
Biographic Data
| ID | 6177101 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jan Peil |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jan |
| FAMILY NAME | Peil |
| SIGNATURE | PEIL J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Radboud University Nijmegen |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2008 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2011 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
On the Conversation Between Theologians and Economists
This article seeks to contribute to the development of a conversation between public theology and economics. A major problem for this conversation is the dichotomy between normative and positive judgements about our social reality. This translates into the use of distinctive concepts of value rationality and instrumental rationality. This article proposes an alternative conception of rationality that offers a way out of the positive‐normative dic…
Assessing the New Washington Pluralism from the Perspective of the Malaysian Model
This paper discusses the post-Washington Consensus development paradigm, questioning whether the changes it embodies are sufficient to open up the development debate. We show that the new paradigm, which might be called ‘Washington Pluralism’, harbours three pluralist principles. It maintains that development is 1) contingent on culture; 2) contingent on history; and 3) requiring a multidisciplinary perspective. We assess these principles on the …
No prominent works on this page.
Assessing the New Washington Pluralism from the Perspective of the Malaysian Model
This paper discusses the post-Washington Consensus development paradigm, questioning whether the changes it embodies are sufficient to open up the development debate. We show that the new paradigm, which might be called ‘Washington Pluralism’, harbours three pluralist principles. It maintains that development is 1) contingent on culture; 2) contingent on history; and 3) requiring a multidisciplinary perspective. We assess these principles on the …
On the Conversation Between Theologians and Economists
This article seeks to contribute to the development of a conversation between public theology and economics. A major problem for this conversation is the dichotomy between normative and positive judgements about our social reality. This translates into the use of distinctive concepts of value rationality and instrumental rationality. This article proposes an alternative conception of rationality that offers a way out of the positive‐normative dic…
Economics (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Positive economics (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Analogy (1 work) · Authoritarianism (1 work) · Christian Theology and Mission (1 work) · Conversation (1 work)