Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

J D Crouch

Biographic Data

ID6189558
NAMEJ D Crouch
GIVEN NAMESJ D
FAMILY NAMECrouch
SIGNATURECROUCH J D
AFFILIATIONSNational Institute for Public Policy
ORCID0000-0003-2375-8781
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS1
AUTHOR COUNT4
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1993
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2009
H-INDEX1
  • Understanding the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy Debate

    Christopher F Chyba, Jeffrey Crouch et al.•ARTICLE•The Washington Quarterly•2009•Cited by: 1

  • Missile Defense and National Security

    J D Crouch, Robert Joseph et al.•ARTICLE•Comparative Strategy•2009

    The key missile defense questions facing policymakers today are what kind of systems should be fielded and to what extent should investments be made in future missile defense technologies. In recent years, some have argued that more investments are needed to counter theater-range missile threats, even if such investments come at the expense of developing future capabilities. On the surface, this approach seems reasonable given the sizable increas…

  • Clinton's “slow boat to Korea”

    Jeffrey Crouch, J D Crouch•ARTICLE•Comparative Strategy•1995

    The Clinton administration's rhetoric has belied its policy of concession and inaction toward North Korea's nuclear program. This policy has convinced the North Korean leadership that the longer it stalls, the more the concessions will be forthcoming. While paying lip service to military aspects of counter proliferation, the administration is still emphasizing cooperative, nonadversarial tools. Nuclear deterrence commitments to US. allies (especi…

  • National missile defense

    J D Crouch•ARTICLE•Comparative Strategy•1993

  • Understanding the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy Debate

    Christopher F Chyba, Jeffrey Crouch et al.•ARTICLE•The Washington Quarterly•2009•Cited by: 1

  • National missile defense

    J D Crouch•ARTICLE•Comparative Strategy•1993

  • Clinton's “slow boat to Korea”

    Jeffrey Crouch, J D Crouch•ARTICLE•Comparative Strategy•1995

    The Clinton administration's rhetoric has belied its policy of concession and inaction toward North Korea's nuclear program. This policy has convinced the North Korean leadership that the longer it stalls, the more the concessions will be forthcoming. While paying lip service to military aspects of counter proliferation, the administration is still emphasizing cooperative, nonadversarial tools. Nuclear deterrence commitments to US. allies (especi…

  • Understanding the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy Debate

    Christopher F Chyba, Jeffrey Crouch et al.•ARTICLE•The Washington Quarterly•2009•Cited by: 1

  • Missile Defense and National Security

    J D Crouch, Robert Joseph et al.•ARTICLE•Comparative Strategy•2009

    The key missile defense questions facing policymakers today are what kind of systems should be fielded and to what extent should investments be made in future missile defense technologies. In recent years, some have argued that more investments are needed to counter theater-range missile threats, even if such investments come at the expense of developing future capabilities. On the surface, this approach seems reasonable given the sizable increas…

Political science (4 works) · Engineering (3 works) · International Relations and Foreign Policy (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Missile (3 works) · Nuclear Issues and Defense (3 works) · Aeronautics (2 works) · Aerospace Engineering (2 works) · Aerospace Engineering (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae