Tess Doezema
Biographic Data
| ID | 6209734 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Tess Doezema |
| GIVEN NAMES | Tess |
| FAMILY NAME | Doezema |
| SIGNATURE | DOEZEMA T |
| AFFILIATIONS | Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-0191-7032 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 9 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 4 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 9 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Destruction as care
In order to live well together on a damaged planet, more-than-human care scholarship argues for mutual care and collaboration between humans and non-humans for common survival. Research in this area accordingly emphasizes the life-affirming dimensions of mutual care relationships, paying comparatively little attention to acts of forceful eradication, killing, and destruction except as harms to be minimized. The Brigadas Deseucaliptizadoras is a n…
The Teumessian fox of responsible AI
As users and consumers of AI we can't adjust model weights ourselves, but what we can do . . . we can demand that these systems be designed responsibly and transparently. (‘We are the AI Generation...
From Growth to Governance
Scholarship in degrowth has primarily criticised the twinning of technoscientific and environmental policy as underwritten by an ecomodernist agenda that relies on both technological fixes and economic growth paradigms. Moving beyond such critique, we suggest that current policy discourses on the digital and environmental transition also reveal (shifting) imperatives of governance that grant society and the state a key role in the achievement of …
Critique in, for, with, and of responsible innovation
Critique has been a central theme in Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation (R(R)I). R(R)I promises to critique dominant technocratic and economic regimes by conducting critical analysis, promoting critical reflection, and launching critical interventions to democratize science, technology, and innovation. However, the sheer success of R(R)I as a policy concept promoted by influential international organizations, a measure…
Imagining Nature–Culture Hybridity
This article takes a historical coproductionist approach to examine the pivotal claim of novelty on which circular economy (CE) discourse is centered. CE proponents argue that it represents a paradigm shift: concepts from nature—most notably the efficiency of biological cycles posited to be “without waste”—can be productively applied to the linear economy, resulting in a novel partnership that will correct human–nature relationality. We bring a h…
The new spirit of technoscience
This article situates Responsible Innovation (RI) as part of a largershift in science and technology governance demanding a 'socialfix' for innovation, which we argue amounts to a new spirit oftechnoscience. Inspired by Luc Boltanski and Eve Chiapello'sanalysis of the development of a 'new spirit of capitalism' fromlate twentieth century, we observe the rise of a new governancerationality in technoscientific innovation which places society, itsne…
The promise of Elsi
Scientific knowledge and authority are central to dire warnings of biodiversity loss and climate change, as well as corollary visions of pathways for environmental repair and the provision of future human wellbeing. Such articulations of futures possible through the advance of science and technology, and especially genetics, have been extensively studied by STS scholars concerned with the ways society, government, and capital are ordered in relat…
Fixing Technology with Society
Long presented as a universal policy-recipe for social prosperity and economic growth, the promise of innovation seems to be increasingly in question, giving way to a new vision of progress in which society is advanced as a central enabler of technoeconomic development. Frameworks such as “Responsible” or “Mission-oriented” Innovation, for example, have become commonplace parlance and practice in the governance of the innovation–society nexus. In…
Translation, transduction, and transformation
This special section addresses Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) as an increasingly global concept that is translated and transformed in heterogenous national contexts. Based on seven national perspective articles from the RRI-Practice project, this introduction outlines a framework of transduction through which RRI becomes contextually negotiated and reconfigured. Read together, the national explorations of the special section make visib…
The promise of Elsi
Scientific knowledge and authority are central to dire warnings of biodiversity loss and climate change, as well as corollary visions of pathways for environmental repair and the provision of future human wellbeing. Such articulations of futures possible through the advance of science and technology, and especially genetics, have been extensively studied by STS scholars concerned with the ways society, government, and capital are ordered in relat…
Fixing Technology with Society
Long presented as a universal policy-recipe for social prosperity and economic growth, the promise of innovation seems to be increasingly in question, giving way to a new vision of progress in which society is advanced as a central enabler of technoeconomic development. Frameworks such as “Responsible” or “Mission-oriented” Innovation, for example, have become commonplace parlance and practice in the governance of the innovation–society nexus. In…
Translation, transduction, and transformation
This special section addresses Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) as an increasingly global concept that is translated and transformed in heterogenous national contexts. Based on seven national perspective articles from the RRI-Practice project, this introduction outlines a framework of transduction through which RRI becomes contextually negotiated and reconfigured. Read together, the national explorations of the special section make visib…
Fixing Technology with Society
Long presented as a universal policy-recipe for social prosperity and economic growth, the promise of innovation seems to be increasingly in question, giving way to a new vision of progress in which society is advanced as a central enabler of technoeconomic development. Frameworks such as “Responsible” or “Mission-oriented” Innovation, for example, have become commonplace parlance and practice in the governance of the innovation–society nexus. In…
The new spirit of technoscience
This article situates Responsible Innovation (RI) as part of a largershift in science and technology governance demanding a 'socialfix' for innovation, which we argue amounts to a new spirit oftechnoscience. Inspired by Luc Boltanski and Eve Chiapello'sanalysis of the development of a 'new spirit of capitalism' fromlate twentieth century, we observe the rise of a new governancerationality in technoscientific innovation which places society, itsne…
The promise of Elsi
Scientific knowledge and authority are central to dire warnings of biodiversity loss and climate change, as well as corollary visions of pathways for environmental repair and the provision of future human wellbeing. Such articulations of futures possible through the advance of science and technology, and especially genetics, have been extensively studied by STS scholars concerned with the ways society, government, and capital are ordered in relat…
Critique in, for, with, and of responsible innovation
Critique has been a central theme in Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation (R(R)I). R(R)I promises to critique dominant technocratic and economic regimes by conducting critical analysis, promoting critical reflection, and launching critical interventions to democratize science, technology, and innovation. However, the sheer success of R(R)I as a policy concept promoted by influential international organizations, a measure…
Imagining Nature–Culture Hybridity
This article takes a historical coproductionist approach to examine the pivotal claim of novelty on which circular economy (CE) discourse is centered. CE proponents argue that it represents a paradigm shift: concepts from nature—most notably the efficiency of biological cycles posited to be “without waste”—can be productively applied to the linear economy, resulting in a novel partnership that will correct human–nature relationality. We bring a h…
From Growth to Governance
Scholarship in degrowth has primarily criticised the twinning of technoscientific and environmental policy as underwritten by an ecomodernist agenda that relies on both technological fixes and economic growth paradigms. Moving beyond such critique, we suggest that current policy discourses on the digital and environmental transition also reveal (shifting) imperatives of governance that grant society and the state a key role in the achievement of …
Destruction as care
In order to live well together on a damaged planet, more-than-human care scholarship argues for mutual care and collaboration between humans and non-humans for common survival. Research in this area accordingly emphasizes the life-affirming dimensions of mutual care relationships, paying comparatively little attention to acts of forceful eradication, killing, and destruction except as harms to be minimized. The Brigadas Deseucaliptizadoras is a n…
The Teumessian fox of responsible AI
As users and consumers of AI we can't adjust model weights ourselves, but what we can do . . . we can demand that these systems be designed responsibly and transparently. (‘We are the AI Generation...
Political science (7 works) · Sociology (6 works) · Environmental ethics (5 works) · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (5 works) · Economics (4 works) · Epistemology (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Public relations (4 works) · Corporate governance (3 works)