Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Shana M Solomon

Biographic Data

ID6209756
NAMEShana M Solomon
GIVEN NAMESShana M
FAMILY NAMESolomon
SIGNATURESOLOMON S M
AFFILIATIONSCornell Law School
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS1
TOTAL CITATIONS5
WORKS AS AUTHOR1
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1996
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1996
H-INDEX1
  • Setting Boundaries between Science and Law

    Open Access•Shana M Solomon, E J Hackett•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•1996•Cited by: 5•References: 14

    In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court made its first major pronouncement on the evaluation of scientific evidence, calling on judges to act as gatekeepers for scientific knowledge and validity, despite lack of scientific training among judges. Daubert offers the science studies community a case study for examining how judges (and scientists acting as experts) engage in boundary-work and construct scientific valid…

  • Setting Boundaries between Science and Law

    Open Access•Shana M Solomon, E J Hackett•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•1996•Cited by: 5•References: 14

    In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court made its first major pronouncement on the evaluation of scientific evidence, calling on judges to act as gatekeepers for scientific knowledge and validity, despite lack of scientific training among judges. Daubert offers the science studies community a case study for examining how judges (and scientists acting as experts) engage in boundary-work and construct scientific valid…

  • Setting Boundaries between Science and Law

    Open Access•Shana M Solomon, E J Hackett•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•1996•Cited by: 5•References: 14

    In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court made its first major pronouncement on the evaluation of scientific evidence, calling on judges to act as gatekeepers for scientific knowledge and validity, despite lack of scientific training among judges. Daubert offers the science studies community a case study for examining how judges (and scientists acting as experts) engage in boundary-work and construct scientific valid…

Adversarial system (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Construct (python library (1 work) · Epistemology (1 work) · Ethics in Clinical Research (1 work) · Federal Rules of Evidence (1 work) · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (1 work) · Law (1 work) · Law (1 work) · Philosophy and History of Science (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae