Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

David Freeman Engstrom

Biographic Data

ID6212002
NAMEDavid Freeman Engstrom
GIVEN NAMESDavid Freeman
FAMILY NAMEEngstrom
SIGNATUREENGSTROM D F
AFFILIATIONSStanford Medicine
ORCID0009-0005-8049-9474
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS4
AUTHOR COUNT3
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2018
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX1
  • Regulating Government AI and the Challenge of Sociotechnical Design

    Open Access•David Freeman Engstrom, Amit Haim•ARTICLE•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2023•Cited by: 4•References: 16

    Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming how governments work, from distribution of public benefits, to identifying enforcement targets, to meting out sanctions. But given AI's twin capacity to cause and cure error, bias, and inequity, there is little consensus about how to regulate its use. This review advances debate by lifting up research at the intersection of computer science, organizational behavior, and law. First, pushing past the usu…

  • Rights, Redistribution, and the Rise of the “Litigation State”

    Open Access•David Freeman Engstrom, David Hausman et al.•ARTICLE•Law & Social Inquiry•2021•References: 13

    Critics have long maintained that the rights revolution and, by extension, the postwar turn to litigation as a regulatory tool, are the product of a cynical legislative choice. On this view, legislators choose rights and litigation over alternative regulatory approaches to shift costs from on-budget forms (for example, publicly funded social provisions, public enforcement actions by prosecutors or agencies) to off-budget forms (for example, right…

  • What If California Had a Foreign Policy? The New Frontier of States’ Rights

    David Freeman Engstrom, Jeremy M Weinstein•ARTICLE•The Washington Quarterly•2018

    When President Donald Trump announced his decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris agreement on climate change, the response from local and state officials was swift. The mayors of 61

  • Regulating Government AI and the Challenge of Sociotechnical Design

    Open Access•David Freeman Engstrom, Amit Haim•ARTICLE•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2023•Cited by: 4•References: 16

    Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming how governments work, from distribution of public benefits, to identifying enforcement targets, to meting out sanctions. But given AI's twin capacity to cause and cure error, bias, and inequity, there is little consensus about how to regulate its use. This review advances debate by lifting up research at the intersection of computer science, organizational behavior, and law. First, pushing past the usu…

  • What If California Had a Foreign Policy? The New Frontier of States’ Rights

    David Freeman Engstrom, Jeremy M Weinstein•ARTICLE•The Washington Quarterly•2018

    When President Donald Trump announced his decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris agreement on climate change, the response from local and state officials was swift. The mayors of 61

  • Rights, Redistribution, and the Rise of the “Litigation State”

    Open Access•David Freeman Engstrom, David Hausman et al.•ARTICLE•Law & Social Inquiry•2021•References: 13

    Critics have long maintained that the rights revolution and, by extension, the postwar turn to litigation as a regulatory tool, are the product of a cynical legislative choice. On this view, legislators choose rights and litigation over alternative regulatory approaches to shift costs from on-budget forms (for example, publicly funded social provisions, public enforcement actions by prosecutors or agencies) to off-budget forms (for example, right…

  • Regulating Government AI and the Challenge of Sociotechnical Design

    Open Access•David Freeman Engstrom, Amit Haim•ARTICLE•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2023•Cited by: 4•References: 16

    Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming how governments work, from distribution of public benefits, to identifying enforcement targets, to meting out sanctions. But given AI's twin capacity to cause and cure error, bias, and inequity, there is little consensus about how to regulate its use. This review advances debate by lifting up research at the intersection of computer science, organizational behavior, and law. First, pushing past the usu…

Economics (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Law and economics (2 works) · Public Administration (2 works) · Public Administration (2 works) · Accountability (1 works) · Agency (philosophy (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae