Johanna Meehan
Biographic Data
| ID | 6213468 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Johanna Meehan |
| GIVEN NAMES | Johanna |
| FAMILY NAME | Meehan |
| SIGNATURE | MEEHAN J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Grinnell College |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 4 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1997 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Feminism and rethinking our models of the self
In this article I argue that Butler and Benhabib work with models of the self that should be jettisoned. Butler relies on what I call the outside-to-inside model, while Benhabib shuttles between an outside-to-inside and an inside-to-outside model. Because of the inherent limitations of these models neither can do what both authors set out to do, which is to describe the ontogeny of the self. I trace their discussions over the course of their writ…
Memories of Prague
Thoughts on William Rehg's Insight and Solidarity
Feminism and Habermas’ discourse ethics
Habermas’ account of the radically intersubjective constitution of subjectivity is of great use to feminist theorists, as is his defense of the rational character of normative claims. Feminists must however, reject his reductive identification of subjectivity with language and rationality. Some feminists’ concerns insist on continuing to distinguish morality from legality, something that Habermas, despite his own better intuitions and arguments, …
Interpretation and Social Science
Feminism and rethinking our models of the self
In this article I argue that Butler and Benhabib work with models of the self that should be jettisoned. Butler relies on what I call the outside-to-inside model, while Benhabib shuttles between an outside-to-inside and an inside-to-outside model. Because of the inherent limitations of these models neither can do what both authors set out to do, which is to describe the ontogeny of the self. I trace their discussions over the course of their writ…
Feminism and Habermas’ discourse ethics
Habermas’ account of the radically intersubjective constitution of subjectivity is of great use to feminist theorists, as is his defense of the rational character of normative claims. Feminists must however, reject his reductive identification of subjectivity with language and rationality. Some feminists’ concerns insist on continuing to distinguish morality from legality, something that Habermas, despite his own better intuitions and arguments, …
Interpretation and Social Science
Feminism and Habermas’ discourse ethics
Habermas’ account of the radically intersubjective constitution of subjectivity is of great use to feminist theorists, as is his defense of the rational character of normative claims. Feminists must however, reject his reductive identification of subjectivity with language and rationality. Some feminists’ concerns insist on continuing to distinguish morality from legality, something that Habermas, despite his own better intuitions and arguments, …
Thoughts on William Rehg's Insight and Solidarity
Feminism and rethinking our models of the self
In this article I argue that Butler and Benhabib work with models of the self that should be jettisoned. Butler relies on what I call the outside-to-inside model, while Benhabib shuttles between an outside-to-inside and an inside-to-outside model. Because of the inherent limitations of these models neither can do what both authors set out to do, which is to describe the ontogeny of the self. I trace their discussions over the course of their writ…
Memories of Prague
Epistemology (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Sociology (5 works) · Law (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Discourse ethics (2 works) · Feminism (2 works) · Gender Studies (2 works) · Gender Studies (2 works)