Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ulf Dieckmann

Biographic Data

ID6232555
NAMEUlf Dieckmann
GIVEN NAMESUlf
FAMILY NAMEDieckmann
SIGNATUREDIECKMANN U
AFFILIATIONSInternational Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
ORCID0000-0001-7089-0393
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS5
AUTHOR COUNT6
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2016
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX1
  • Understanding multiple resilience dividends and system boundaries in disaster- and climate-risk management: A systems approach for enhanced decision-making

    Open Access•Stefan Hochrainer‐stigler, Reinhard Mechler et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Research Letters•2025

    Challenges in managing multi-hazards and multi-risks within complex risk landscapes—where numerous stakeholders with different priority needs and risk perceptions interact—remain unresolved. Here we suggest ways to tackle these pressing challenges in an integrated and comprehensive manner by applying key concepts from systemic risk research to triple- and multiple-dividend approaches. The central idea is that additional dividends (i.e., economic,…

  • Managing systemic risk through transformative change: Combining systemic risk analysis with knowledge co-production

    Open Access•Stefan Hochrainer‐stigler, Teresa Maria Deubelli-Hwang et al.•ARTICLE•One Earth•2024

    Increasing interconnectedness, along with the effects of climate change and other global risk drivers, has led to mounting systemic risks in the complex systems that characterize our world. Systemic risks, with their cascading impacts and long-term sustainability concerns, necessitate transformative approaches to manage their effects across system scales and dimensions. To date, however, an “operationalization gap” impedes translating between pro…

  • Enhancing resilience of systems to individual and systemic risk: Steps toward an integrative framework

    Open Access•Stefan Hochrainer‐stigler, Célian Colon et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of Disaster…•2020

    Individual events can trigger systemic risks in many complex systems, from natural to man-made. Yet, analysts are still usually treating these two types of risks separately. We suggest that, rather, individual risks and systemic risks represent two ends of a continuum and therefore should not be analyzed in isolation, but in an integrative manner. Such a perspective can further be related to the notion of resilience and opens up options for devel…

  • Measuring, modeling, and managing systemic risk: The missing aspect of human agency

    Open Access•Stefan Hochrainer‐stigler, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Risk Research•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 11

    It is problematic to treat systemic risk as a merely technical problem that can be solved by natural-science methods and through biological and ecological analogies. There appears to be a discrepancy between understanding systemic risk from a natural-science perspective and the unresolved challenges that arise when humans with their initiatives and interactions are included in systemic-risk considerations. It is therefore necessary to investigate…

  • A Game of Common-pool Resource Management: Effects of Communication, Risky Environment and Worldviews

    Open Access•Peter Bednarik, Joanne Linnerooth-Bayer et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2018•Cited by: 4•References: 6

  • Vulnerability to shocks in the global seafood trade network

    Open Access•Jessica A Gephart, Elena Rovenskaya et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Research Letters•2016

    Trade can allow countries to overcome local or regional losses (shocks) to their food supply, but reliance on international food trade also exposes countries to risks from external perturbations. Countries that are nutritionally or economically dependent on international trade of a commodity may be adversely affected by such shocks. While exposure to shocks has been studied in financial markets, communication networks, and some infrastructure sys…

  • A Game of Common-pool Resource Management: Effects of Communication, Risky Environment and Worldviews

    Open Access•Peter Bednarik, Joanne Linnerooth-Bayer et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2018•Cited by: 4•References: 6

  • Measuring, modeling, and managing systemic risk: The missing aspect of human agency

    Open Access•Stefan Hochrainer‐stigler, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Risk Research•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 11

    It is problematic to treat systemic risk as a merely technical problem that can be solved by natural-science methods and through biological and ecological analogies. There appears to be a discrepancy between understanding systemic risk from a natural-science perspective and the unresolved challenges that arise when humans with their initiatives and interactions are included in systemic-risk considerations. It is therefore necessary to investigate…

  • Vulnerability to shocks in the global seafood trade network

    Open Access•Jessica A Gephart, Elena Rovenskaya et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Research Letters•2016

    Trade can allow countries to overcome local or regional losses (shocks) to their food supply, but reliance on international food trade also exposes countries to risks from external perturbations. Countries that are nutritionally or economically dependent on international trade of a commodity may be adversely affected by such shocks. While exposure to shocks has been studied in financial markets, communication networks, and some infrastructure sys…

  • A Game of Common-pool Resource Management: Effects of Communication, Risky Environment and Worldviews

    Open Access•Peter Bednarik, Joanne Linnerooth-Bayer et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2018•Cited by: 4•References: 6

  • Measuring, modeling, and managing systemic risk: The missing aspect of human agency

    Open Access•Stefan Hochrainer‐stigler, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Risk Research•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 11

    It is problematic to treat systemic risk as a merely technical problem that can be solved by natural-science methods and through biological and ecological analogies. There appears to be a discrepancy between understanding systemic risk from a natural-science perspective and the unresolved challenges that arise when humans with their initiatives and interactions are included in systemic-risk considerations. It is therefore necessary to investigate…

  • Enhancing resilience of systems to individual and systemic risk: Steps toward an integrative framework

    Open Access•Stefan Hochrainer‐stigler, Célian Colon et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of Disaster…•2020

    Individual events can trigger systemic risks in many complex systems, from natural to man-made. Yet, analysts are still usually treating these two types of risks separately. We suggest that, rather, individual risks and systemic risks represent two ends of a continuum and therefore should not be analyzed in isolation, but in an integrative manner. Such a perspective can further be related to the notion of resilience and opens up options for devel…

  • Managing systemic risk through transformative change: Combining systemic risk analysis with knowledge co-production

    Open Access•Stefan Hochrainer‐stigler, Teresa Maria Deubelli-Hwang et al.•ARTICLE•One Earth•2024

    Increasing interconnectedness, along with the effects of climate change and other global risk drivers, has led to mounting systemic risks in the complex systems that characterize our world. Systemic risks, with their cascading impacts and long-term sustainability concerns, necessitate transformative approaches to manage their effects across system scales and dimensions. To date, however, an “operationalization gap” impedes translating between pro…

  • Understanding multiple resilience dividends and system boundaries in disaster- and climate-risk management: A systems approach for enhanced decision-making

    Open Access•Stefan Hochrainer‐stigler, Reinhard Mechler et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Research Letters•2025

    Challenges in managing multi-hazards and multi-risks within complex risk landscapes—where numerous stakeholders with different priority needs and risk perceptions interact—remain unresolved. Here we suggest ways to tackle these pressing challenges in an integrated and comprehensive manner by applying key concepts from systemic risk research to triple- and multiple-dividend approaches. The central idea is that additional dividends (i.e., economic,…

Business (6 works) · Economics (6 works) · Computer Science (5 works) · Complex Systems and Decision Making (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Risk analysis (engineering (3 works) · Systemic risk (3 works) · Computer security (2 works) · Ecosystem dynamics and resilience (2 works) · Environmental resource management (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae