Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

CAMILLIA KONG

Biographic Data

ID6308084
NAMECAMILLIA KONG
GIVEN NAMESCAMILLIA
FAMILY NAMEKONG
SIGNATUREKONG C
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS1
WORKS AS AUTHOR4
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2012
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2022
H-INDEX1
  • Justifying and practising effective participation in the Court of Protection

    Open Access•Chao Kong, CAMILLIA KONG et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Law and Society•2022

    Under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 in England and Wales (MCA), the participation of persons in making decisions that affect their lives is embedded within the legislation and has also been addressed directly in Court of Protection (CoP) rules and guidelines. Nonetheless, various studies and reports have indicated a potential gap between practice on the ground and the participatory aspirations of the MCA. This article presents an analysis of semi‐…

  • From Best Interests to Better Interests? Values, Unwisdom and Objectivity in Mental Capacity Law

    Open Access•John Coggon, Chao Kong et al.•ARTICLE•The Cambridge Law Journal•2021

    The Mental Capacity Act 2005 governs personal decision-making for adults. It incorporates five overarching principles, including that incapacity may not be inferred merely from a person's unwise decisions and that where a person lacks capacity decisions must be made in her best interests. Through analysis of judicial treatment of unwisdom, best interests, subjectivity and objectivity, considered against parliamentary debates on the Mental Capacit…

  • Constructing female sexual and reproductive agency in mental capacity law

    Open Access•Chao Kong, CAMILLIA KONG•ARTICLE•International Journal of Law and…•2019

  • The Normative Source of Kantian Hypothetical Imperatives

    Chao Kong, CAMILLIA KONG•ARTICLE•International Journal of…•2012•Cited by: 1•References: 10

    This paper offers a critique of Christine Korsgaard’s interpretation of Kantian instrumental reason. Korsgaard understands Kantian hypothetical imperatives to share a common normative source with the categorical imperative – namely self-legislating, human rational agency. However, her reading of Kantian hypothetical imperatives is problematic for three reasons. Firstly, Korsgaard’s agent-centred approach renders incoherent Kant’s analytic-synthet…

  • The Normative Source of Kantian Hypothetical Imperatives

    Chao Kong, CAMILLIA KONG•ARTICLE•International Journal of…•2012•Cited by: 1•References: 10

    This paper offers a critique of Christine Korsgaard’s interpretation of Kantian instrumental reason. Korsgaard understands Kantian hypothetical imperatives to share a common normative source with the categorical imperative – namely self-legislating, human rational agency. However, her reading of Kantian hypothetical imperatives is problematic for three reasons. Firstly, Korsgaard’s agent-centred approach renders incoherent Kant’s analytic-synthet…

  • The Normative Source of Kantian Hypothetical Imperatives

    Chao Kong, CAMILLIA KONG•ARTICLE•International Journal of…•2012•Cited by: 1•References: 10

    This paper offers a critique of Christine Korsgaard’s interpretation of Kantian instrumental reason. Korsgaard understands Kantian hypothetical imperatives to share a common normative source with the categorical imperative – namely self-legislating, human rational agency. However, her reading of Kantian hypothetical imperatives is problematic for three reasons. Firstly, Korsgaard’s agent-centred approach renders incoherent Kant’s analytic-synthet…

  • Constructing female sexual and reproductive agency in mental capacity law

    Open Access•Chao Kong, CAMILLIA KONG•ARTICLE•International Journal of Law and…•2019

  • From Best Interests to Better Interests? Values, Unwisdom and Objectivity in Mental Capacity Law

    Open Access•John Coggon, Chao Kong et al.•ARTICLE•The Cambridge Law Journal•2021

    The Mental Capacity Act 2005 governs personal decision-making for adults. It incorporates five overarching principles, including that incapacity may not be inferred merely from a person's unwise decisions and that where a person lacks capacity decisions must be made in her best interests. Through analysis of judicial treatment of unwisdom, best interests, subjectivity and objectivity, considered against parliamentary debates on the Mental Capacit…

  • Justifying and practising effective participation in the Court of Protection

    Open Access•Chao Kong, CAMILLIA KONG et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Law and Society•2022

    Under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 in England and Wales (MCA), the participation of persons in making decisions that affect their lives is embedded within the legislation and has also been addressed directly in Court of Protection (CoP) rules and guidelines. Nonetheless, various studies and reports have indicated a potential gap between practice on the ground and the participatory aspirations of the MCA. This article presents an analysis of semi‐…

Epistemology (3 works) · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Law (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Mental capacity (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Affect (linguistics (1 work) · Agency (philosophy (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae