Michele Pecorari
Biographic Data
| ID | 6346052 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Michele Pecorari |
| GIVEN NAMES | Michele |
| FAMILY NAME | Pecorari |
| SIGNATURE | PECORARI M |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Oxford https://dx.doi.org/6396 Oxford UK |
| ORCID | 0009-0000-5637-8684 |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Goodness and Non-Univocity in Nicomachean Ethics 1.6
In the following, I examine Aristotle’s non-univocity argument against the Form of the Good in Nicomachean Ethics ( EN ) 1.6. I assess the main available interpretations of it and, having shown that they are not wholly satisfactory, I put forward a new one, based on strong textual evidence deriving from EN and the Topics . According to this interpretation, in EN 1.6 Aristotle should be taken to speak about a particular kind of good: goods which a…
A Linguistic Muddle. Sextus’ Arguments against Universals at PH 2.227–8
At Outlines of Pyrrhonism ( PH ) 2.227–8, Sextus Empiricus argues that certain entities which his adversaries hold to be one and the same for different individuals are in fact not. This he does by, among other things, considering the truth-value of sentences of which the subject is a common noun, thereby drawing an interesting connection between metaphysics and semantics. In this article, I provide a careful analysis of Sextus’ arguments at PH 2.…
No prominent works on this page.
A Linguistic Muddle. Sextus’ Arguments against Universals at PH 2.227–8
At Outlines of Pyrrhonism ( PH ) 2.227–8, Sextus Empiricus argues that certain entities which his adversaries hold to be one and the same for different individuals are in fact not. This he does by, among other things, considering the truth-value of sentences of which the subject is a common noun, thereby drawing an interesting connection between metaphysics and semantics. In this article, I provide a careful analysis of Sextus’ arguments at PH 2.…
Goodness and Non-Univocity in Nicomachean Ethics 1.6
In the following, I examine Aristotle’s non-univocity argument against the Form of the Good in Nicomachean Ethics ( EN ) 1.6. I assess the main available interpretations of it and, having shown that they are not wholly satisfactory, I put forward a new one, based on strong textual evidence deriving from EN and the Topics . According to this interpretation, in EN 1.6 Aristotle should be taken to speak about a particular kind of good: goods which a…
Argument (complex analysis (2 works) · Chemistry (2 works) · Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Linguistics (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Ancient philosophy (1 work) · Classical Antiquity Studies (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work)