Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jed Handelsman Shugerman

Biographic Data

ID6367997
NAMEJed Handelsman Shugerman
GIVEN NAMESJed Handelsman
FAMILY NAMEShugerman
SIGNATURESHUGERMAN J H
AFFILIATIONSBoston University
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS8
AUTHOR COUNT4
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2002
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX1
  • Movement on Removal: An Emerging Consensus about The First Congress and Presidential Power

    Open Access•Jed Handelsman Shugerman•ARTICLE•American Journal of Legal History•2024

    What did the “Decision of 1789” decide about presidential removal power, if anything? It turns out that an emerging consensus of scholars agrees about the First Congress’s lack of consensus. The unitary executive theory posits that a president has exclusive and “indefeasible” executive powers (i.e., powers beyond congressional and judicial checks and balances). This panel was an opportunity for unitary executive theorists and their critics to deb…

  • The People's Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America

    Jed Handelsman Shugerman•BOOK•People's Courts•2012

    In the United States, almost 90 percent of state judges have to run in popular elections to remain on the bench. In the past decade, this peculiarly American institution has produced vicious multi-million-dollar political election campaigns and high-profile allegations of judicial bias and misconduct. The People’s Courts traces the history of judicial elections and Americans’ quest for an independent judiciary—one that would ensure fairness for a…

  • People's Courts

    Jed Handelsman Shugerman•BOOK•People's Courts•2012

  • The Louisiana Purchase and South Carolina's Reopening of the Slave Trade in 1803

    Jed Handelsman Shugerman•ARTICLE•Journal of the Early Republic•2002•Cited by: 8

    Shugerman discusses South Carolina's stunning reversal of slave trading bans in 1803. He argues that the Louisiana Purchase fueled the reversal of the ban and suggests that the state's politicians sacrificed their immediate financial and electoral interests for more distant sectional benefits

  • The Louisiana Purchase and South Carolina's Reopening of the Slave Trade in 1803

    Jed Handelsman Shugerman•ARTICLE•Journal of the Early Republic•2002•Cited by: 8

    Shugerman discusses South Carolina's stunning reversal of slave trading bans in 1803. He argues that the Louisiana Purchase fueled the reversal of the ban and suggests that the state's politicians sacrificed their immediate financial and electoral interests for more distant sectional benefits

  • The Louisiana Purchase and South Carolina's Reopening of the Slave Trade in 1803

    Jed Handelsman Shugerman•ARTICLE•Journal of the Early Republic•2002•Cited by: 8

    Shugerman discusses South Carolina's stunning reversal of slave trading bans in 1803. He argues that the Louisiana Purchase fueled the reversal of the ban and suggests that the state's politicians sacrificed their immediate financial and electoral interests for more distant sectional benefits

  • The People's Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America

    Jed Handelsman Shugerman•BOOK•People's Courts•2012

    In the United States, almost 90 percent of state judges have to run in popular elections to remain on the bench. In the past decade, this peculiarly American institution has produced vicious multi-million-dollar political election campaigns and high-profile allegations of judicial bias and misconduct. The People’s Courts traces the history of judicial elections and Americans’ quest for an independent judiciary—one that would ensure fairness for a…

  • People's Courts

    Jed Handelsman Shugerman•BOOK•People's Courts•2012

  • Movement on Removal: An Emerging Consensus about The First Congress and Presidential Power

    Open Access•Jed Handelsman Shugerman•ARTICLE•American Journal of Legal History•2024

    What did the “Decision of 1789” decide about presidential removal power, if anything? It turns out that an emerging consensus of scholars agrees about the First Congress’s lack of consensus. The unitary executive theory posits that a president has exclusive and “indefeasible” executive powers (i.e., powers beyond congressional and judicial checks and balances). This panel was an opportunity for unitary executive theorists and their critics to deb…

Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Judicial review (2 works) · Legislature (2 works) · Politics (2 works) · Separation of powers (2 works) · American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 works) · Archaeology (1 works) · Argument (complex analysis) (1 works) · Constitutionalism (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae