Manfred Keil
Biographic Data
| ID | 6447167 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Manfred Keil |
| GIVEN NAMES | Manfred |
| FAMILY NAME | Keil |
| SIGNATURE | KEIL M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Claremont McKenna College |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 4 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1990 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2002 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Capital mobility for developing countries may not be so high
Canadian and US Unemployment Rates
This paper sets out to explain the Canadian-US unemployment rate gap that has persisted since 1982. The gap, which appeared in two stages, has lasted through peaks and troughs in economic activity. We use a panel of five Canadian and nine US regions to search for the causes. The 1971 liberalization of the Canadian unemployment insurance system can explain the first occurrence of the gap, which was veiled by preferable raw material price movements…
An Analysis of Canadian Unemployment
The paepr reviews different reasons for the emergence in the 1980s of an unemployment gap between Canada and the U.S. We develop a small equilibrium model ofthe Canadian labor market to quantify and evaluate these reasons. We conclude that the gap is essentially due to the liberalization of the benefits system in 1971, the effects of which have often been masked by raw-material booms. The huge increase in unemployment in 1981-82 appears to have b…
Capital mobility for developing countries may not be so high
An Analysis of Canadian Unemployment
The paepr reviews different reasons for the emergence in the 1980s of an unemployment gap between Canada and the U.S. We develop a small equilibrium model ofthe Canadian labor market to quantify and evaluate these reasons. We conclude that the gap is essentially due to the liberalization of the benefits system in 1971, the effects of which have often been masked by raw-material booms. The huge increase in unemployment in 1981-82 appears to have b…
An Analysis of Canadian Unemployment
The paepr reviews different reasons for the emergence in the 1980s of an unemployment gap between Canada and the U.S. We develop a small equilibrium model ofthe Canadian labor market to quantify and evaluate these reasons. We conclude that the gap is essentially due to the liberalization of the benefits system in 1971, the effects of which have often been masked by raw-material booms. The huge increase in unemployment in 1981-82 appears to have b…
Canadian and US Unemployment Rates
This paper sets out to explain the Canadian-US unemployment rate gap that has persisted since 1982. The gap, which appeared in two stages, has lasted through peaks and troughs in economic activity. We use a panel of five Canadian and nine US regions to search for the causes. The 1971 liberalization of the Canadian unemployment insurance system can explain the first occurrence of the gap, which was veiled by preferable raw material price movements…
Capital mobility for developing countries may not be so high
Economic growth (3 works) · Economics (3 works) · Geography (2 works) · Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (2 works) · Unemployment (2 works) · Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (1 work) · Canadian Policy and Governance (1 work) · Capital (architecture (1 work) · Capital flows (1 work) · Demographic economics (1 work)