Chun‐Young Park
Biographic Data
| ID | 6449574 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Chun‐Young Park |
| GIVEN NAMES | Chun‐Young |
| FAMILY NAME | Park |
| SIGNATURE | PARK C Y |
| AFFILIATIONS | Nazarbayev University |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-7847-2233 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Expanding Access, Preserving Judgment
What role should large language models (LLMs) play in social science research? The rapid rise of LLMs has generated both excitement and trepidation about their functional and ethical implications. This study evaluates their role in political science data production through the Universal Periodic Review Other Stakeholders’ Engagement (UPROSE) Dataset Project. The UPROSE project uses Universal Periodic Review reports from Non-Governmental Organizat…
Active Yet Cautious
This article examines how states positioned in the middle of the international status hierarchy behave in the United Nations Universal Periodic Review (UPR). While the UPR was established as a cooperative mechanism to move away from confrontational naming and shaming, in practice it has become a reputational arena where states strategically calibrate their engagement. I argue that mid‐status states pursue a logic of status–visibility optimization…
Manufacturing compliance
Why do pariah autocracies engage with international human rights institutions? This study explores how pariah autocracies, states that are isolated from the international community and domestically unresponsive autocracies lacking democratic institutions, use the United Nations’ Universal Periodic Review to shape their international reputations. We argue that these autocracies craft diplomatic strategies that create an image of compliance while p…
You scratch my back, and I scratch yours
What drives some authoritarian states to engage in more naming and shaming of human rights violations than others? The Universal Periodic Review is a unique process requiring all UN members to participate in peer review on human rights issues. It has already finished its third cycle with active participation from all members since 2008. Although both democracies and authoritarian regimes have engaged in peer reviews on human rights issues, few st…
No prominent works on this page.
You scratch my back, and I scratch yours
What drives some authoritarian states to engage in more naming and shaming of human rights violations than others? The Universal Periodic Review is a unique process requiring all UN members to participate in peer review on human rights issues. It has already finished its third cycle with active participation from all members since 2008. Although both democracies and authoritarian regimes have engaged in peer reviews on human rights issues, few st…
Expanding Access, Preserving Judgment
What role should large language models (LLMs) play in social science research? The rapid rise of LLMs has generated both excitement and trepidation about their functional and ethical implications. This study evaluates their role in political science data production through the Universal Periodic Review Other Stakeholders’ Engagement (UPROSE) Dataset Project. The UPROSE project uses Universal Periodic Review reports from Non-Governmental Organizat…
Active Yet Cautious
This article examines how states positioned in the middle of the international status hierarchy behave in the United Nations Universal Periodic Review (UPR). While the UPR was established as a cooperative mechanism to move away from confrontational naming and shaming, in practice it has become a reputational arena where states strategically calibrate their engagement. I argue that mid‐status states pursue a logic of status–visibility optimization…
Manufacturing compliance
Why do pariah autocracies engage with international human rights institutions? This study explores how pariah autocracies, states that are isolated from the international community and domestically unresponsive autocracies lacking democratic institutions, use the United Nations’ Universal Periodic Review to shape their international reputations. We argue that these autocracies craft diplomatic strategies that create an image of compliance while p…
Autocracy (2 works) · Democracy (2 works) · Human rights (2 works) · Politics (2 works) · Artificial Intelligence in Law (1 work) · Computational and Text Analysis Methods (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Dictatorship (1 work) · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (1 work) · European Union Policy and Governance (1 work)