Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

M A G von Keyserlingk

Biographic Data

ID6460440
NAMEM A G von Keyserlingk
GIVEN NAMESM A G
FAMILY NAMEvon Keyserlingk
SIGNATUREVON KEYSERLINGK M A G
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of British Columbia
ORCID0000-0002-1427-3152
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS3
WORKS AS AUTHOR8
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2014
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX1
  • Silencing controversial realities through prompt revision

    Open Access•Kehan Sheng, Frank Tuyttens et al.•ARTICLE•Technology in Society•2026

    Generative AI like ChatGPT is increasingly integrated into people’s daily lives as a vehicle for information access and to aid decision-making. However, misinformation and biases are embedded in these models, raising ethical concerns. Previous research has revealed AI biases regarding human attributes like skin tone, gender, and geo-culture. To mitigate these biases in text-to-image generative AI models, companies like OpenAI introduced prompt re…

  • Engaging publics on gene editing of farm animals

    Open Access•Will Wright, Katherine E Koralesky et al.•ARTICLE•Elementa Science of the…•2025

    Researchers are using diverse strategies to engage publics on what they think about emerging biotechnologies in agriculture, like gene editing applications for farm animals. As anyone can now access gray literature when seeking information on the Internet, we reviewed online gray literature as a dataset to understand public engagement strategies. We found 34 documents through our online search and expert consultation, and categorized documents ba…

  • Gene editing in animals

    Open Access•Christine Kuo, Katherine E Koralesky et al.•ARTICLE•Public Understanding of Science•2024

    Organizations involved with gene editing may engage with the public to share information and address concerns about the technology. It is unclear, however, if the information shared aligns with what people want to know. We aimed to understand what members of the public want to know about gene editing in animals by soliciting their questions through an open-ended survey question and comparing them with questions posed in Frequently Asked Question …

  • Invertebrate research without ethical or regulatory oversight reduces public confidence and trust

    Open Access•Michael W Brunt, Henrik Kreiberg et al.•ARTICLE•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2022

    Ethical and regulatory oversight of research animals is focused on vertebrates and rarely includes invertebrates. Our aim was to undertake the first study to describe differences in public confidence, trust, and expectations for the oversight of scientists using animals in research. Participants were presented with one of four treatments using a 2 by 2 design; terrestrial (T; mice and grasshoppers) vs. aquatic (A; zebrafish and sea stars) and ver…

  • Citizen views on genome editing

    Open Access•Gesa Busch, Erin Ryan et al.•ARTICLE•Agriculture and Human Values•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    Public opinion can affect the adoption of genome editing technologies. In food production, genome editing can be applied to a wide range of applications, in different species and with different purposes. This study analyzed how the public responds to five different applications of genome editing, varying the species involved and the proposed purpose of the modification. Three of the applications described the introduction of disease resistance wi…

  • Awareness of ag-gag laws erodes trust in farmers and increases support for animal welfare regulations

    Open Access•J A Robbins, Jesse Robbins et al.•ARTICLE•Food Policy•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 3

  • Animal Welfare Concerns and Values of Stakeholders Within the Dairy Industry

    Open Access•Beth Ventura, B A Ventura et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Agricultural and…•2014•References: 8

  • The Ticking Clock

    Open Access•M A G von Keyserlingk, María José Hötzel•ARTICLE•Journal of Agricultural and…•2014•References: 10

  • Awareness of ag-gag laws erodes trust in farmers and increases support for animal welfare regulations

    Open Access•J A Robbins, Jesse Robbins et al.•ARTICLE•Food Policy•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 3

  • Citizen views on genome editing

    Open Access•Gesa Busch, Erin Ryan et al.•ARTICLE•Agriculture and Human Values•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    Public opinion can affect the adoption of genome editing technologies. In food production, genome editing can be applied to a wide range of applications, in different species and with different purposes. This study analyzed how the public responds to five different applications of genome editing, varying the species involved and the proposed purpose of the modification. Three of the applications described the introduction of disease resistance wi…

  • Animal Welfare Concerns and Values of Stakeholders Within the Dairy Industry

    Open Access•Beth Ventura, B A Ventura et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Agricultural and…•2014•References: 8

  • The Ticking Clock

    Open Access•M A G von Keyserlingk, María José Hötzel•ARTICLE•Journal of Agricultural and…•2014•References: 10

  • Awareness of ag-gag laws erodes trust in farmers and increases support for animal welfare regulations

    Open Access•J A Robbins, Jesse Robbins et al.•ARTICLE•Food Policy•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 3

  • Citizen views on genome editing

    Open Access•Gesa Busch, Erin Ryan et al.•ARTICLE•Agriculture and Human Values•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    Public opinion can affect the adoption of genome editing technologies. In food production, genome editing can be applied to a wide range of applications, in different species and with different purposes. This study analyzed how the public responds to five different applications of genome editing, varying the species involved and the proposed purpose of the modification. Three of the applications described the introduction of disease resistance wi…

  • Invertebrate research without ethical or regulatory oversight reduces public confidence and trust

    Open Access•Michael W Brunt, Henrik Kreiberg et al.•ARTICLE•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2022

    Ethical and regulatory oversight of research animals is focused on vertebrates and rarely includes invertebrates. Our aim was to undertake the first study to describe differences in public confidence, trust, and expectations for the oversight of scientists using animals in research. Participants were presented with one of four treatments using a 2 by 2 design; terrestrial (T; mice and grasshoppers) vs. aquatic (A; zebrafish and sea stars) and ver…

  • Gene editing in animals

    Open Access•Christine Kuo, Katherine E Koralesky et al.•ARTICLE•Public Understanding of Science•2024

    Organizations involved with gene editing may engage with the public to share information and address concerns about the technology. It is unclear, however, if the information shared aligns with what people want to know. We aimed to understand what members of the public want to know about gene editing in animals by soliciting their questions through an open-ended survey question and comparing them with questions posed in Frequently Asked Question …

  • Engaging publics on gene editing of farm animals

    Open Access•Will Wright, Katherine E Koralesky et al.•ARTICLE•Elementa Science of the…•2025

    Researchers are using diverse strategies to engage publics on what they think about emerging biotechnologies in agriculture, like gene editing applications for farm animals. As anyone can now access gray literature when seeking information on the Internet, we reviewed online gray literature as a dataset to understand public engagement strategies. We found 34 documents through our online search and expert consultation, and categorized documents ba…

  • Silencing controversial realities through prompt revision

    Open Access•Kehan Sheng, Frank Tuyttens et al.•ARTICLE•Technology in Society•2026

    Generative AI like ChatGPT is increasingly integrated into people’s daily lives as a vehicle for information access and to aid decision-making. However, misinformation and biases are embedded in these models, raising ethical concerns. Previous research has revealed AI biases regarding human attributes like skin tone, gender, and geo-culture. To mitigate these biases in text-to-image generative AI models, companies like OpenAI introduced prompt re…

Political science (5 works) · Business (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Animal and Plant Science Education (3 works) · Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (3 works) · Animal welfare (3 works) · Biology (3 works) · CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 works) · Genetically Modified Organisms Research (3 works) · Human-Animal Interaction Studies (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae